Adds two unittests:
- First checks the path selection of basic Tor circs.
- Second checks the path selection of vanguard circs.
There is a TODO on the second unittest that we might want to test sooner than
later, but it's not trivial to do it right now.
To do these unittests we needed the following mods:
- Make some functions STATIC.
- Add some more fields to the big fake network nodes of test_entrynodes.c
- Switch fake node nicknames to base32 (because base64 does not produce valid nicknames).
This prevents a malicious RP/IP from learning the guard node in the case that
we are using only one (because we aren't using two guards, or because one of
those two guards is temporarily down).
This ensures the "strong" version of Property #6 from
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2018-April/013098.html
(Information about the guard(s) does not leak to the website/RP at all).
The last hop in vanguard circuits can be an RP/IP/HSDir.
Since vanguard circuits are at least 3 hops (sometimes 4) before this node,
this change will not cause A - B - A paths.
In order to fix 25691 and 25692, we need to pass the "direct_conn"
flag to more places -- particularly when choosing single-hop
tunnels. The right way to do this involves having a couple more
functions accept router_crn_flags_t, rather than a big list of
boolean arguments.
This commit also makes sure that choose_good_exit_server_general()
honors the direct_conn flag, to fix 25691 and 25692.
This patch adds a new node_has_preferred_descriptor() function, and
replaces most users of node_has_descriptor() with it. That's an
important change, since as of d1874b4339 (our fix for #25213),
we are willing to say that a node has _some_ descriptor, but not the
_right_ descriptor for a particular use case.
Part of a fix for 25691 and 25692.
In d1874b4339, we adjusted this check so that we insist on
using routerinfos for bridges. That's almost correct... but if we
have a bridge that is also a regular relay, then we should use
insist on its routerinfo when connecting to it as a bridge
(directly), and be willing to use its microdescriptor when
connecting to it elsewhere in our circuits.
This bug is a likely cause of some (all?) of the (exit_ei == NULL)
failures we've been seeing.
Fixes bug 25691; bugfix on 0.3.3.4-alpha
* ADD new /src/common/crypto_rand.[ch] module.
* ADD new /src/common/crypto_util.[ch] module (contains the memwipe()
function, since all crypto_* modules need this).
* FIXES part of #24658: https://bugs.torproject.org/24658
This update is needed to make it consistent with the behavior of
node_awaiting_ipv6(), which doesn't believe in the addresses from
routerinfos unless it actually plans to use those routerinfos.
Fixes bug 25213; bugfix on b66b62fb75 in 0.3.3.1-alpha,
which tightened up the definition of node_awaiting_ipv6().
Additionally, this change extracts the functions that created and
freed these elements.
These structures had common "forward&reverse stream&digest"
elements, but they were initialized and freed through cpath objects,
and different parts of the code depended on them. Now all that code
is extacted, and kept in relay_crypto.c
This removes the code that tracks the extend attemps a client makes. We don't
use it and it was only used to provide statistics on a SIGUSR1 from the
rephist dump stats function.
Part of #25163
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
In order to make the OR and dir checking functions in router.c less confusing
we renamed some functions and splitted consider_testing_reachability() into
router_should_check_reachability() and router_do_reachability_checks(). Also we
improved the documentation.
Fixes#18918.
Signed-off-by: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <ffmancera@riseup.net>
The is_first_hop field should have been called used_create_fast,
but everywhere that we wanted to check it, we should have been
checking channel_is_client() instead.
Before, this function meant "can we connect to this node and
authenticate it using its ed25519 key?" Now it can additionally
mean, "when somebody else connects to this node, do we expect that
they can authenticate using the node's ed25519 key"?
This change lets us future-proof our link authentication a bit.
Closes ticket 20895. No backport needed, since ed25519 link
authentication support has not been in any LTS release yet, and
existing releases with it should be obsolete before any releases
without support for linkauth=3 are released.
Version 3 hidden service needs rendezvous point that have the protocol version
HSRend >= 2 else the rendezvous cells are rejected.
Fixes#23361
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
