mirror of
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor.git
synced 2024-11-10 13:13:44 +01:00
Split the behavior of node_supports_ed25519_link_authentication().
Before, this function meant "can we connect to this node and authenticate it using its ed25519 key?" Now it can additionally mean, "when somebody else connects to this node, do we expect that they can authenticate using the node's ed25519 key"? This change lets us future-proof our link authentication a bit. Closes ticket 20895. No backport needed, since ed25519 link authentication support has not been in any LTS release yet, and existing releases with it should be obsolete before any releases without support for linkauth=3 are released.
This commit is contained in:
parent
362bc880b1
commit
3124c921e7
6
changes/ticket20895
Normal file
6
changes/ticket20895
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
||||
o Minor features (forward-compatibility):
|
||||
- If a relay supports some link authentication protocol that we do not
|
||||
recognize, then include that relay's ed25519 key when telling other
|
||||
relays to extend to it. Previously, we treated future versions as if
|
||||
they were too old to support ed25519 link authentication.
|
||||
Closes ticket 20895.
|
@ -1290,7 +1290,7 @@ circuit_extend(cell_t *cell, circuit_t *circ)
|
||||
const node_t *node = node_get_by_id((const char*)ec.node_id);
|
||||
const ed25519_public_key_t *node_ed_id = NULL;
|
||||
if (node &&
|
||||
node_supports_ed25519_link_authentication(node) &&
|
||||
node_supports_ed25519_link_authentication(node, 1) &&
|
||||
(node_ed_id = node_get_ed25519_id(node))) {
|
||||
ed25519_pubkey_copy(&ec.ed_pubkey, node_ed_id);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -2698,7 +2698,7 @@ extend_info_from_node(const node_t *node, int for_direct_connect)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Don't send the ed25519 pubkey unless the target node actually supports
|
||||
* authenticating with it. */
|
||||
if (node_supports_ed25519_link_authentication(node)) {
|
||||
if (node_supports_ed25519_link_authentication(node, 0)) {
|
||||
log_info(LD_CIRC, "Including Ed25519 ID for %s", node_describe(node));
|
||||
ed_pubkey = node_get_ed25519_id(node);
|
||||
} else if (node_get_ed25519_id(node)) {
|
||||
|
@ -886,7 +886,7 @@ connection_or_check_canonicity(or_connection_t *conn, int started_here)
|
||||
|
||||
const node_t *r = node_get_by_id(id_digest);
|
||||
if (r &&
|
||||
node_supports_ed25519_link_authentication(r) &&
|
||||
node_supports_ed25519_link_authentication(r, 1) &&
|
||||
! node_ed25519_id_matches(r, ed_id)) {
|
||||
/* If this node is capable of proving an ed25519 ID,
|
||||
* we can't call this a canonical connection unless both IDs match. */
|
||||
|
@ -3284,7 +3284,7 @@ dirserv_orconn_tls_done(const tor_addr_t *addr,
|
||||
ri = node->ri;
|
||||
|
||||
if (get_options()->AuthDirTestEd25519LinkKeys &&
|
||||
node_supports_ed25519_link_authentication(node) &&
|
||||
node_supports_ed25519_link_authentication(node, 1) &&
|
||||
ri->cache_info.signing_key_cert) {
|
||||
/* We allow the node to have an ed25519 key if we haven't been told one in
|
||||
* the routerinfo, but if we *HAVE* been told one in the routerinfo, it
|
||||
@ -3367,7 +3367,7 @@ dirserv_single_reachability_test(time_t now, routerinfo_t *router)
|
||||
tor_assert(node);
|
||||
|
||||
if (options->AuthDirTestEd25519LinkKeys &&
|
||||
node_supports_ed25519_link_authentication(node)) {
|
||||
node_supports_ed25519_link_authentication(node, 1)) {
|
||||
ed_id_key = &router->cache_info.signing_key_cert->signing_key;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
ed_id_key = NULL;
|
||||
|
@ -1494,7 +1494,7 @@ pick_intro_point(unsigned int direct_conn, smartlist_t *exclude_nodes)
|
||||
/* Let's do a basic sanity check here so that we don't end up advertising the
|
||||
* ed25519 identity key of relays that don't actually support the link
|
||||
* protocol */
|
||||
if (!node_supports_ed25519_link_authentication(node)) {
|
||||
if (!node_supports_ed25519_link_authentication(node, 0)) {
|
||||
tor_assert_nonfatal(ed25519_public_key_is_zero(&info->ed_identity));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -962,23 +962,29 @@ node_ed25519_id_matches(const node_t *node, const ed25519_public_key_t *id)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Return true iff <b>node</b> supports authenticating itself
|
||||
* by ed25519 ID during the link handshake in a way that we can understand
|
||||
* when we probe it. */
|
||||
* by ed25519 ID during the link handshake. If <b>compatible_with_us</b>,
|
||||
* it needs to be using a link authentication method that we understand.
|
||||
* If not, any plausible link authentication method will do. */
|
||||
int
|
||||
node_supports_ed25519_link_authentication(const node_t *node)
|
||||
node_supports_ed25519_link_authentication(const node_t *node,
|
||||
int compatible_with_us)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* XXXX Oh hm. What if some day in the future there are link handshake
|
||||
* versions that aren't 3 but which are ed25519 */
|
||||
if (! node_get_ed25519_id(node))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
if (node->ri) {
|
||||
const char *protos = node->ri->protocol_list;
|
||||
if (protos == NULL)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
return protocol_list_supports_protocol(protos, PRT_LINKAUTH, 3);
|
||||
if (compatible_with_us)
|
||||
return protocol_list_supports_protocol(protos, PRT_LINKAUTH, 3);
|
||||
else
|
||||
return protocol_list_supports_protocol_or_later(protos, PRT_LINKAUTH, 3);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (node->rs) {
|
||||
return node->rs->supports_ed25519_link_handshake;
|
||||
if (compatible_with_us)
|
||||
return node->rs->supports_ed25519_link_handshake_compat;
|
||||
else
|
||||
return node->rs->supports_ed25519_link_handshake_any;
|
||||
}
|
||||
tor_assert_nonfatal_unreached_once();
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
@ -65,7 +65,8 @@ const smartlist_t *node_get_declared_family(const node_t *node);
|
||||
const ed25519_public_key_t *node_get_ed25519_id(const node_t *node);
|
||||
int node_ed25519_id_matches(const node_t *node,
|
||||
const ed25519_public_key_t *id);
|
||||
int node_supports_ed25519_link_authentication(const node_t *node);
|
||||
int node_supports_ed25519_link_authentication(const node_t *node,
|
||||
int compatible_with_us);
|
||||
int node_supports_v3_hsdir(const node_t *node);
|
||||
int node_supports_ed25519_hs_intro(const node_t *node);
|
||||
int node_supports_v3_rendezvous_point(const node_t *node);
|
||||
|
@ -2316,8 +2316,12 @@ typedef struct routerstatus_t {
|
||||
unsigned int supports_extend2_cells:1;
|
||||
|
||||
/** True iff this router has a protocol list that allows it to negotiate
|
||||
* ed25519 identity keys on a link handshake. */
|
||||
unsigned int supports_ed25519_link_handshake:1;
|
||||
* ed25519 identity keys on a link handshake with us. */
|
||||
unsigned int supports_ed25519_link_handshake_compat:1;
|
||||
|
||||
/** True iff this router has a protocol list that allows it to negotiate
|
||||
* ed25519 identity keys on a link handshake, at all. */
|
||||
unsigned int supports_ed25519_link_handshake_any:1;
|
||||
|
||||
/** True iff this router has a protocol list that allows it to be an
|
||||
* introduction point supporting ed25519 authentication key which is part of
|
||||
|
@ -2701,8 +2701,10 @@ routerstatus_parse_entry_from_string(memarea_t *area,
|
||||
rs->protocols_known = 1;
|
||||
rs->supports_extend2_cells =
|
||||
protocol_list_supports_protocol(tok->args[0], PRT_RELAY, 2);
|
||||
rs->supports_ed25519_link_handshake =
|
||||
rs->supports_ed25519_link_handshake_compat =
|
||||
protocol_list_supports_protocol(tok->args[0], PRT_LINKAUTH, 3);
|
||||
rs->supports_ed25519_link_handshake_any =
|
||||
protocol_list_supports_protocol_or_later(tok->args[0], PRT_LINKAUTH, 3);
|
||||
rs->supports_ed25519_hs_intro =
|
||||
protocol_list_supports_protocol(tok->args[0], PRT_HSINTRO, 4);
|
||||
rs->supports_v3_hsdir =
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user