crypto_log_errors() has been moved to crypto_util.[ch]. It was duplicated in
some files so they have been removed too.
Follows #24658.
Signed-off-by: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <ffmancera@riseup.net>
* ADD new /src/common/crypto_rand.[ch] module.
* ADD new /src/common/crypto_util.[ch] module (contains the memwipe()
function, since all crypto_* modules need this).
* FIXES part of #24658: https://bugs.torproject.org/24658
Folks have found two in the past week or so; we may as well fix the
others.
Found with:
\#!/usr/bin/python3
import re
def findMulti(fname):
includes = set()
with open(fname) as f:
for line in f:
m = re.match(r'^\s*#\s*include\s+["<](\S+)[>"]', line)
if m:
inc = m.group(1)
if inc in includes:
print("{}: {}".format(fname, inc))
includes.add(m.group(1))
import sys
for fname in sys.argv[1:]:
findMulti(fname)
Included crypto_digest.h in some files in order to solve xof+digest module
dependency issues. Removed crypto.h where it isn't needed anymore.
Follows #24658.
Signed-off-by: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <ffmancera@riseup.net>
This was introduced in 4ff170d7b1, and is probably
unreachable, but coverity complained about it (CID 1417761). Bug not
in any released Tor, so no changes file.
Introduce a way to optionally enable Rust integration for our builds. No
actual Rust code is added yet and specifying the flag has no effect
other than failing the build if rustc and cargo are unavailable.
If a hostname is supplied to tor-resolve which is too long, it will be
silently truncated, resulting in a different hostname lookup:
$ tor-resolve $(python -c 'print("google.com" + "m" * 256)')
If tor-resolve uses SOCKS5, the length is stored in an unsigned char,
which overflows in this case and leads to the hostname "google.com".
As this one is a valid hostname, it returns an address instead of giving
an error due to the invalid supplied hostname.
They broke stem, and breaking application compatibility is usually a
bad idea.
This reverts commit 6e10130e18,
commit 78a13df158, and
commit 62f52a888a.
We might re-apply this later, if all the downstream tools can handle
it, and it turns out to be useful for some reason.
In our code to write public keys to a string, for some unfathomable
reason since 253f0f160e, we would allocate a memory BIO, then
set the NOCLOSE flag on it, extract its memory buffer, and free it.
Then a little while later we'd free the memory buffer with
BUF_MEM_free().
As of openssl 1.1 this doesn't work any more, since there is now a
BIO_BUF_MEM structure that wraps the BUF_MEM structure. This
BIO_BUF_MEM doesn't get freed in our code.
So, we had a memory leak!
Is this an openssl bug? Maybe. But our code was already pretty
silly. Why mess around with the NOCLOSE flag here when we can just
keep the BIO object around until we don't need the buffer any more?
Fixes bug 20553; bugfix on 0.0.2pre8
There's accessors to get at things, but it ends up being rather
cumbersome. The only place where behavior should change is that the
code will fail instead of attempting to generate a new DH key if our
internal sanity check fails.
Like the previous commit, this probably breaks snapshots prior to pre5.
This is a big-ish patch, but it's very straightforward. Under this
clang warning, we're not actually allowed to have a global variable
without a previous extern declaration for it. The cases where we
violated this rule fall into three roughly equal groups:
* Stuff that should have been static.
* Stuff that was global but where the extern was local to some
other C file.
* Stuff that was only global when built for the unit tests, that
needed a conditional extern in the headers.
The first two were IMO genuine problems; the last is a wart of how
we build tests.
We know there are overflows in curve25519-donna-c32, so we'll have
to have that one be fwrapv.
Only apply the asan, ubsan, and trapv options to the code that does
not need to run in constant time. Those options introduce branches
to the code they instrument.
(These introduced branches should never actually be taken, so it
might _still_ be constant time after all, but branch predictors are
complicated enough that I'm not really confident here. Let's aim for
safety.)
Closes 17983.
* DIGEST_SHA3_[256,512] added as supported algorithms, which do
exactly what is said on the tin.
* test/bench now benchmarks all of the supported digest algorithms,
so it's possible to see just how slow SHA-3 is, though the message
sizes could probably use tweaking since this is very dependent on
the message size vs the SHA-3 rate.
