The node_get_ed25519_id() warning can actually be triggered by a relay flagged
with NoEdConsensus so instead of triggering a warning on all relays of the
network, downgrade it to protocol warning.
Fixes#24025
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
When the directory information changes, callback to the HS client subsystem so
it can check if any pending SOCKS connections are waiting for a descriptor. If
yes, attempt a refetch for those.
Fixes#23762
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Before, this function meant "can we connect to this node and
authenticate it using its ed25519 key?" Now it can additionally
mean, "when somebody else connects to this node, do we expect that
they can authenticate using the node's ed25519 key"?
This change lets us future-proof our link authentication a bit.
Closes ticket 20895. No backport needed, since ed25519 link
authentication support has not been in any LTS release yet, and
existing releases with it should be obsolete before any releases
without support for linkauth=3 are released.
This is a large and important unit test for the hidden service version
3! It tests the service reachability for a client using different
consensus timings and makes sure that the computed hashring is the same
on both side so it is actually reachable.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
With the latest change on how we use the HSDir index, the client and service
need to pick their responsible HSDir differently that is depending on if they
are before or after a new time period.
The overlap mode is active function has been renamed for this and test added.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Based on our #23387 findings, it seems like to maintain 24/7
reachability we need to employ different logic when computing hsdir
indices for fetching vs storing. That's to guarantee that the client
will always fetch the current descriptor, while the service will always
publish two descriptors aiming to cover all possible edge cases.
For more details see the next commit and the spec branch.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Use the valid_after time from the consensus to get the time period number else
we might get out of sync with the overlap period that uses valid_after.
Make it an optional feature since some functions require passing a
specific time (like hs_get_start_time_of_next_time_period()).
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Version 3 hidden service needs rendezvous point that have the protocol version
HSRend >= 2 else the rendezvous cells are rejected.
Fixes#23361
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
When merging #20657, somehow hs_service_dir_info_changed() became unused
leading to not use the re-upload to HSDir when we were missing information
feature.
Turns out that it is not possible to pick an HSDir with a missing descriptor
because in order to compute the HSDir index, the descriptor is mandatory to
have so we can know its position on the hashring.
This commit removes that dead feature and fix the
hs_service_dir_info_changed() not being used.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Right now there's a single warn_if_unnamed flag for
router_get_consensus_status_by_nickname() and
node_get_by_nickname(), that is nearly always 1. I've turned it
into an 'unsigned' bitfield, and inverted its sense. I've added the
flags argument to node_get_by_hex_id() too, though it does nothing
there right now.
I've removed the router_get_consensus_status_by_nickname() function,
since it was only used in once place.
This patch changes the warning behavior of GETINFO ns/name/<name>,
since all other name lookups from the controller currently warn.
Later I'm going to add more flags, for ed25519 support.
When we enter overlap mode we start using the next hsdir index of
relays. However, we only compute the next hsdir index of relays when we
receive a consensus or their descriptor. This means that there is a
window of time between entering the overlap period and fetching the
consensus where relays have their next hsdir index uninitialized. This
patch fixes this by recomputing all hsdir indices when we first enter
the overlap period.
We want to reupload our descriptor if its set of responsible HSDirs
changed to minimize reachability issues.
This patch adds a callback everytime we get new dirinfo which checks if
the hash ring changed and reuploads descriptor if needed.
We also had to alter the SRV functions to take a consensus as optional
input, since we might be setting our HSDir index using a consensus that
is currently being processed and won't be returned by the
networkstatus_get_live_consensus() function.
This change has two results:
a) It makes sure we are using a fresh consensus with the right SRV value
when we are calculating the HSDir hash ring.
b) It ensures that we will not use the sr_get_current/previous()
functions when we don't have a consensus which would have falsely
triggered the disaster SRV logic.
In Nick's words:
"We want to always return false if the platform is a Tor version, and it
is not as new as 0.3.0.8 -- but if the platform is not a Tor version, or
if the version is as new as 0.3.0.8, then we want to obey the protocol
list.
That way, other implementations of our protocol won't have to claim any
particular Tor version, and future versions of Tor will have the freedom
to drop this protocol in the distant future."
This hsdir index value is used to give an index value to all node_t (relays)
that supports HSDir v3. An index value is then computed using the blinded key
to know where to fetch/upload the service descriptor from/to.
To avoid computing that index value everytime the client/service needs it, we
do that everytime we get a new consensus which then doesn't change until the
next one. The downside is that we need to sort them once we need to compute
the set of responsible HSDir.
Finally, the "hs_index" function is also added but not used. It will be used
in later commits to compute which node_t is a responsible HSDir for the
service we want to fetch/upload the descriptor.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
When the new path selection logic went into place, I accidentally
dropped the code that considered the _family_ of the exit node when
deciding if the guard was usable, and we didn't catch that during
code review.
This patch makes the guard_restriction_t code consider the exit
family as well, and adds some (hopefully redundant) checks for the
case where we lack a node_t for a guard but we have a bridge_info_t
for it.
Fixes bug 22753; bugfix on 0.3.0.1-alpha. Tracked as TROVE-2016-006
and CVE-2017-0377.
