When we find a conflict in the keypinning journal, treat the new
entry as superseding all old entries that overlap either of its
keys.
Also add a (not-yet-used) configuration option to disable keypinning
enforcement.
src/test/test_policy.c:
Merged calls to policies_parse_exit_policy by adding additional arguments.
fixup to remaining instance of ~EXIT_POLICY_IPV6_ENABLED.
Compacting logic test now produces previous list length of 4, corrected this.
src/config/torrc.sample.in:
src/config/torrc.minimal.in-staging:
Merged torrc modification dates in favour of latest.
Log an info-level message containing the reject line added to the
exit policy for each local IP address blocked by ExitPolicyRejectPrivate:
- Published IPv4 and IPv6 addresses
- Publicly routable IPv4 and IPv6 interface addresses
ExitPolicyRejectPrivate now rejects more local addresses by default:
* the relay's published IPv6 address (if any), and
* any publicly routable IPv4 or IPv6 addresses on any local interfaces.
This resolves a security issue for IPv6 Exits and multihomed Exits that
trust connections originating from localhost.
Resolves ticket 17027. Patch by "teor".
Patch on 42b8fb5a15 (11 Nov 2007), released in 0.2.0.11-alpha.
In previous versions of Tor, ExitPolicy accept6/reject6 * produced
policy entries for IPv4 and IPv6 wildcard addresses.
To reduce operator confusion, change accept6/reject6 * to only produce
an IPv6 wildcard address.
Resolves bug #16069.
Patch on 2eb7eafc9d and a96c0affcb (25 Oct 2012),
released in 0.2.4.7-alpha.
Tor now warns when ExitPolicy lines occur after accept/reject *:*
or variants. These lines are redundant, and were always ignored.
Partial fix for ticket 16069. Patch by "teor".
Patch on 2eb7eafc9d and a96c0affcb (25 Oct 2012),
released in 0.2.4.7-alpha.
When parsing torrc ExitPolicies, we now warn if:
* an IPv4 address is used on an accept6 or reject6 line. The line is
ignored, but the rest of the policy items in the list are used.
(accept/reject continue to allow both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses in torrcs.)
* a "private" address alias is used on an accept6 or reject6 line.
The line filters both IPv4 and IPv6 private addresses, disregarding
the 6 in accept6/reject6.
When parsing torrc ExitPolicies, we now issue an info-level message:
* when expanding an accept/reject * line to include both IPv4 and IPv6
wildcard addresses.
In each instance, usage advice is provided to avoid the message.
Partial fix for ticket 16069. Patch by "teor".
Patch on 2eb7eafc9d and a96c0affcb (25 Oct 2012),
released in 0.2.4.7-alpha.
When validating a new descriptor against our rend cache failure, we were
added the failure entry to the new cache entry without duplicating. It was
then freed just after the validation ending up in a very bad memory state
that was making tor abort(). To fix this, a dup function has been added and
used just before adding the failure entry.
Fixes#17041
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@ev0ke.net>
No functional changes, but since NoKeepAliveIsolateSOCKSAuth isn't
part of isoflag, it should be checked where all other similar options
are, and bypass the (no-op) masking at the end.
This controls the circuit dirtyness reset behavior added for Tor
Browser's user experience fix (#15482). Unlike previous iterations
of this patch, the tunable actually works, and is documented.
When this is set, and Tor is running as a relay, it will not
generate or load its secret identity key. You can manage the secret
identity key with --keygen. Implements ticket 16944.
In a nutshell, since a circuit can not exit at its entry point, it's very
easy for an attacker to find the hidden service guard if only one EntryNodes
is specified since for that guard, the HS will refuse to build a rendezvous
circuit to it.
For now, the best solution is to stop tor to allow a single EntryNodes for
an hidden service.
Fixes#14917
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@ev0ke.net>
Only applies to connections with SOCKS auth set, so that non-web Tor
activity is not affected.
Simpler version of Nick's patch because the randomness worried me, and I'm not
otherwise sure why we want a max here.
In validate_recommended_package_line, at this point in the function,
n_entries is always >= 1. Coverity doesn't like us checking it for
0.
CID 1268063.
