mirror of
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor.git
synced 2024-11-28 06:13:31 +01:00
91200136b7
svn:r1941
206 lines
8.6 KiB
Plaintext
206 lines
8.6 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
Legend:
|
|
SPEC!! - Not specified
|
|
SPEC - Spec not finalized
|
|
NICK - nick claims
|
|
ARMA - arma claims
|
|
- Not done
|
|
* Top priority
|
|
. Partially done
|
|
o Done
|
|
D Deferred
|
|
X Abandoned
|
|
|
|
For 0.0.7:
|
|
o allow multiple log files
|
|
o *bindaddress
|
|
o include the port
|
|
o allow multiple of them
|
|
o have an allow/deny series for socks
|
|
o break exitpolicy into multiple config lines
|
|
o have the OP forget routers it hasn't heard about in 24 hours
|
|
D try to break apart the main clump of functions better.
|
|
o rend_services_introduce should check if it's failed a lot
|
|
recently, and not try for a while if so
|
|
o check tor version as soon as you get the recommended-versions
|
|
string, regardless of whether parsing the directory succeeded.
|
|
NICK o Check directory signature based on signer ID, not on who
|
|
we got it from
|
|
ARMA o Increase all the scalability constants
|
|
|
|
For scalability:
|
|
- Slightly smarter bandwidth management: use link capacity
|
|
intelligently.
|
|
- Handle full buffers without totally borking
|
|
|
|
For 0.0.8:
|
|
NICK . rename/rearrange functions for what file they're in
|
|
ARMA - make all ORs serve the directory too.
|
|
- Contact info, pgp fingerprint, comments in router desc.
|
|
|
|
For September:
|
|
NICK . Windows port
|
|
o works as client
|
|
- deal with pollhup / reached_eof on all platforms
|
|
. robust as a client
|
|
- works as server
|
|
- can be configured
|
|
- robust as a server
|
|
- docs for building in win
|
|
- installer?
|
|
|
|
- Docs
|
|
- FAQ
|
|
- overview of tor. how does it work, what's it do, pros and
|
|
cons of using it, why should I use it, etc.
|
|
- a howto tutorial with examples
|
|
- tutorial: how to set up your own tor network
|
|
- (need to not hardcode dirservers file in config.c)
|
|
. correct, update, polish spec
|
|
- document the exposed function api?
|
|
- document what we mean by socks.
|
|
|
|
NICK - packages
|
|
- rpm
|
|
- find a long-term rpm maintainer
|
|
|
|
- code
|
|
- better warn/info messages
|
|
- let tor do resolves.
|
|
- extend socks4 to do resolves?
|
|
- make script to ask tor for resolves
|
|
- tsocks
|
|
- gather patches, submit to maintainer
|
|
- intercept gethostbyname and others, do resolve via tor
|
|
- redesign and thorough code revamp, with particular eye toward:
|
|
- support half-open tcp connections
|
|
- conn key rotation
|
|
- other transports -- http, airhook
|
|
- modular introduction mechanism
|
|
- allow non-clique topology
|
|
|
|
Other details and small and hard things:
|
|
- tor should be able to have a pool of outgoing IP addresses
|
|
that it is able to rotate through. (maybe)
|
|
- tie into squid
|
|
- buffer size pool, to let a few buffers grow huge or many buffers
|
|
grow a bit
|
|
- hidserv offerers shouldn't need to define a SocksPort
|
|
- when the client fails to pick an intro point for a hidserv,
|
|
it should refetch the hidserv desc.
|
|
. should maybe make clients exit(1) when bad things happen?
|
|
e.g. clock skew.
|
|
- should retry exitpolicy end streams even if the end cell didn't
|
|
resolve the address for you
|
|
- Add '[...truncated]' or similar to truncated log entries (like the directory
|
|
in connection_dir_process_inbuf()).
|
|
. Make logs handle it better when writing to them fails.
|
|
o Dirserver shouldn't put you in running-routers list if you haven't
|
|
uploaded a descriptor recently
|
|
. Refactor: add own routerinfo to routerlist. Right now, only
|
|
router_get_by_nickname knows about 'this router', as a hack to
|
|
get circuit_launch_new to do the right thing.
|
|
. Scrubbing proxies
|
|
- Find an smtp proxy?
|
|
. Get socks4a support into Mozilla
|
|
- Extend by nickname/hostname/something, not by IP.
|
|
- Need a relay teardown cell, separate from one-way ends.
|
|
- Make it harder to circumvent bandwidth caps: look at number of bytes
|
|
sent across sockets, not number sent inside TLS stream.
|
|
- fix router_get_by_* functions so they can get ourselves too,
|
|
and audit everything to make sure rend and intro points are
|
|
just as likely to be us as not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
***************************Future tasks:****************************
|
|
|
|
Rendezvous and hidden services:
|
|
make it fast:
|
|
- preemptively build and start rendezvous circs.
|
|
- preemptively build n-1 hops of intro circs?
|
|
- cannibalize general circs?
|
|
make it reliable:
|
|
- standby/hotswap/redundant services.
|
|
- store stuff to disk? dirservers forget service descriptors when
|
|
they restart; nodes offering hidden services forget their chosen
|
|
intro points when they restart.
|
|
make it robust:
|
|
- auth mechanisms to let midpoint and bob selectively choose
|
|
connection requests.
|
|
make it scalable:
|
|
- right now the hidserv store/lookup system is run by the dirservers;
|
|
this won't scale.
|
|
|
|
Tor scalability:
|
|
Relax clique assumptions.
|
|
Redesign how directories are handled.
|
|
- Separate running-routers lookup from descriptor list lookup.
|
|
- Resolve directory agreement somehow.
|
|
- Cache directory on all servers.
|
|
Find and remove bottlenecks
|
|
- Address linear searches on e.g. circuit and connection lists.
|
|
Reputation/memory system, so dirservers can measure people,
|
|
and so other people can verify their measurements.
|
|
- Need to measure via relay, so it's not distinguishable.
|
|
Bandwidth-aware path selection. So people with T3's are picked
|
|
more often than people with DSL.
|
|
Reliability-aware node selection. So people who are stable are
|
|
preferred for long-term circuits such as intro and rend circs,
|
|
and general circs for irc, aim, ssh, etc.
|
|
Let dissidents get to Tor servers via Tor users. ("Backbone model")
|
|
|
|
Anonymity improvements:
|
|
Is abandonding the circuit the only option when an extend fails, or
|
|
can we do something without impacting anonymity too much?
|
|
Is exiting from the middle of the circuit always a bad idea?
|
|
Helper nodes. Decide how to use them to improve safety.
|
|
DNS resolution: need to make tor support resolve requests. Need to write
|
|
a script and an interface (including an extension to the socks
|
|
protocol) so we can ask it to do resolve requests. Need to patch
|
|
tsocks to intercept gethostbyname, else we'll continue leaking it.
|
|
Improve path selection algorithms based on routing-zones paper. Be sure
|
|
to start and end circuits in different ASs. Ideally, consider AS of
|
|
source and destination -- maybe even enter and exit via nearby AS.
|
|
Intermediate model, with some delays and mixing.
|
|
Add defensive dropping regime?
|
|
|
|
Make it more correct:
|
|
Handle half-open connections: right now we don't support all TCP
|
|
streams, at least according to the protocol. But we handle all that
|
|
we've seen in the wild.
|
|
Support IPv6.
|
|
|
|
Efficiency/speed/robustness:
|
|
Congestion control. Is our current design sufficient once we have heavy
|
|
use? Need to measure and tweak, or maybe overhaul.
|
|
Allow small cells and large cells on the same network?
|
|
Cell buffering and resending. This will allow us to handle broken
|
|
circuits as long as the endpoints don't break, plus will allow
|
|
connection (tls session key) rotation.
|
|
Implement Morphmix, so we can compare its behavior, complexity, etc.
|
|
Use cpuworker for more heavy lifting.
|
|
- Signing (and verifying) hidserv descriptors
|
|
- Signing (and verifying) intro/rend requests
|
|
- Signing (and verifying) router descriptors
|
|
- Signing (and verifying) directories
|
|
- Doing TLS handshake (this is very hard to separate out, though)
|
|
Buffer size pool: allocate a maximum size for all buffers, not
|
|
a maximum size for each buffer. So we don't have to give up as
|
|
quickly (and kill the thickpipe!) when there's congestion.
|
|
Exit node caching: tie into squid or other caching web proxy.
|
|
Other transport. HTTP, udp, rdp, airhook, etc. May have to do our own
|
|
link crypto, unless we can bully openssl into it.
|
|
|
|
P2P Tor:
|
|
Do all the scalability stuff above, first.
|
|
Incentives to relay. Not so hard.
|
|
Incentives to allow exit. Possibly quite hard.
|
|
Sybil defenses without having a human bottleneck.
|
|
How to gather random sample of nodes.
|
|
How to handle nodelist recommendations.
|
|
Consider incremental switches: a p2p tor with only 50 users has
|
|
different anonymity properties than one with 10k users, and should
|
|
be treated differently.
|
|
|