mirror of
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor.git
synced 2024-11-11 13:43:47 +01:00
fefba95363
Removing the last DOCDOC comment hurt so much that I had to use Doxygen to identify undocumented macros and comments, and add 150 more DOCDOCs to point out where they were. Oops. Hey, kids! Fixing some of these could be your first Tor patch! svn:r9477
710 lines
21 KiB
C
710 lines
21 KiB
C
/* Copyright (c) 2001-2004, Roger Dingledine.
|
|
* Copyright (c) 2004-2006, Roger Dingledine, Nick Mathewson. */
|
|
/* See LICENSE for licensing information */
|
|
/* $Id$ */
|
|
const char policies_c_id[] = \
|
|
"$Id$";
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* \file policies.c
|
|
* \brief Code to parse and use address policies and exit policies.
|
|
**/
|
|
|
|
#include "or.h"
|
|
|
|
/** DOCDOC */
|
|
static addr_policy_t *socks_policy = NULL;
|
|
/** DOCDOC */
|
|
static addr_policy_t *dir_policy = NULL;
|
|
/** DOCDOC */
|
|
static addr_policy_t *authdir_reject_policy = NULL;
|
|
/** DOCDOC */
|
|
static addr_policy_t *authdir_invalid_policy = NULL;
|
|
/** DOCDOC */
|
|
static addr_policy_t *authdir_badexit_policy = NULL;
|
|
|
|
/** Parsed addr_policy_t describing which addresses we believe we can start
|
|
* circuits at. */
|
|
static addr_policy_t *reachable_or_addr_policy = NULL;
|
|
/** Parsed addr_policy_t describing which addresses we believe we can connect
|
|
* to directories at. */
|
|
static addr_policy_t *reachable_dir_addr_policy = NULL;
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Given a linked list of config lines containing "allow" and "deny"
|
|
* tokens, parse them and append the result to <b>dest</b>. Return -1
|
|
* if any tokens are malformed, else return 0.
|
|
*/
|
|
static int
|
|
parse_addr_policy(config_line_t *cfg, addr_policy_t **dest,
|
|
int assume_action)
|
|
{
|
|
addr_policy_t **nextp;
|
|
smartlist_t *entries;
|
|
int r = 0;
|
|
|
|
if (!cfg)
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
nextp = dest;
|
|
|
|
while (*nextp)
|
|
nextp = &((*nextp)->next);
|
|
|
|
entries = smartlist_create();
|
|
for (; cfg; cfg = cfg->next) {
|
|
smartlist_split_string(entries, cfg->value, ",",
|
|
SPLIT_SKIP_SPACE|SPLIT_IGNORE_BLANK, 0);
|
|
SMARTLIST_FOREACH(entries, const char *, ent,
|
|
{
|
|
log_debug(LD_CONFIG,"Adding new entry '%s'",ent);
|
|
*nextp = router_parse_addr_policy_from_string(ent, assume_action);
|
|
if (*nextp) {
|
|
if (addr_mask_get_bits((*nextp)->msk)<0) {
|
|
log_warn(LD_CONFIG, "Address policy element '%s' can't be expressed "
|
|
"as a bit prefix.", ent);
|
|
}
|
|
/* Advance nextp to the end of the policy. */
|
|
while (*nextp)
|
|
nextp = &((*nextp)->next);
|
|
} else {
|
|
log_warn(LD_CONFIG,"Malformed policy '%s'.", ent);
|
|
r = -1;
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
SMARTLIST_FOREACH(entries, char *, ent, tor_free(ent));
|
|
smartlist_clear(entries);
|
|
}
|
|
smartlist_free(entries);
|
|
return r;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Helper: parse the Reachable(Dir|OR)?Addresses fields into
|
|
* reachable_(or|dir)_addr_policy. */
|
|
static void
|
|
parse_reachable_addresses(void)
|
|
{
|
|
or_options_t *options = get_options();
|
|
|
|
if (options->ReachableDirAddresses &&
|
|
options->ReachableORAddresses &&
|
|
options->ReachableAddresses) {
|
|
log_warn(LD_CONFIG,
|
|
"Both ReachableDirAddresses and ReachableORAddresses are set. "
|
|
"ReachableAddresses setting will be ignored.");
|
|
}
|
|
addr_policy_free(reachable_or_addr_policy);
|
|
reachable_or_addr_policy = NULL;
|
|
if (!options->ReachableORAddresses && options->ReachableAddresses)
|
|
log_info(LD_CONFIG,
|
|
"Using ReachableAddresses as ReachableORAddresses.");
|
|
if (parse_addr_policy(options->ReachableORAddresses ?
|
|
options->ReachableORAddresses :
|
|
options->ReachableAddresses,
|
|
&reachable_or_addr_policy, ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPT)) {
|
|
log_warn(LD_CONFIG,
|
|
"Error parsing Reachable%sAddresses entry; ignoring.",
|
|
options->ReachableORAddresses ? "OR" : "");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
addr_policy_free(reachable_dir_addr_policy);
|
|
reachable_dir_addr_policy = NULL;
|
|
if (!options->ReachableDirAddresses && options->ReachableAddresses)
|
|
log_info(LD_CONFIG,
|
|
"Using ReachableAddresses as ReachableDirAddresses");
|
|
if (parse_addr_policy(options->ReachableDirAddresses ?
|
|
options->ReachableDirAddresses :
|
|
options->ReachableAddresses,
|
|
&reachable_dir_addr_policy, ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPT)) {
|
|
if (options->ReachableDirAddresses)
|
|
log_warn(LD_CONFIG,
|
|
"Error parsing ReachableDirAddresses entry; ignoring.");
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Return true iff the firewall options might block any address:port
|
|
* combination.
|
|
*/
|
|
int
|
|
firewall_is_fascist_or(void)
|
|
{
|
|
return reachable_or_addr_policy != NULL;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Return true iff <b>policy</b> (possibly NULL) will allow a
|
|
* connection to <b>addr</b>:<b>port</b>.
|
|
*/
|
|
static int
|
|
addr_policy_permits_address(uint32_t addr, uint16_t port,
|
|
addr_policy_t *policy)
|
|
{
|
|
addr_policy_result_t p;
|
|
p = compare_addr_to_addr_policy(addr, port, policy);
|
|
switch (p) {
|
|
case ADDR_POLICY_PROBABLY_ACCEPTED:
|
|
case ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPTED:
|
|
return 1;
|
|
case ADDR_POLICY_PROBABLY_REJECTED:
|
|
case ADDR_POLICY_REJECTED:
|
|
return 0;
|
|
default:
|
|
log_warn(LD_BUG, "Unexpected result: %d", (int)p);
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int
|
|
fascist_firewall_allows_address_or(uint32_t addr, uint16_t port)
|
|
{
|
|
return addr_policy_permits_address(addr, port,
|
|
reachable_or_addr_policy);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int
|
|
fascist_firewall_allows_address_dir(uint32_t addr, uint16_t port)
|
|
{
|
|
return addr_policy_permits_address(addr, port,
|
|
reachable_dir_addr_policy);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Return 1 if <b>addr</b> is permitted to connect to our dir port,
|
|
* based on <b>dir_policy</b>. Else return 0.
|
|
*/
|
|
int
|
|
dir_policy_permits_address(uint32_t addr)
|
|
{
|
|
return addr_policy_permits_address(addr, 1, dir_policy);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Return 1 if <b>addr</b> is permitted to connect to our socks port,
|
|
* based on <b>socks_policy</b>. Else return 0.
|
|
*/
|
|
int
|
|
socks_policy_permits_address(uint32_t addr)
|
|
{
|
|
return addr_policy_permits_address(addr, 1, socks_policy);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Return 1 if <b>addr</b>:<b>port</b> is permitted to publish to our
|
|
* directory, based on <b>authdir_reject_policy</b>. Else return 0.
|
|
*/
|
|
int
|
|
authdir_policy_permits_address(uint32_t addr, uint16_t port)
|
|
{
|
|
return addr_policy_permits_address(addr, port, authdir_reject_policy);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Return 1 if <b>addr</b>:<b>port</b> is considered valid in our
|
|
* directory, based on <b>authdir_invalid_policy</b>. Else return 0.
|
|
*/
|
|
int
|
|
authdir_policy_valid_address(uint32_t addr, uint16_t port)
|
|
{
|
|
return addr_policy_permits_address(addr, port, authdir_invalid_policy);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Return 1 if <b>addr</b>:<b>port</b> should be marked as a bad exit,
|
|
* based on <b>authdir_badexit_policy</b>. Else return 0.
|
|
*/
|
|
int
|
|
authdir_policy_badexit_address(uint32_t addr, uint16_t port)
|
|
{
|
|
return ! addr_policy_permits_address(addr, port, authdir_badexit_policy);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#define REJECT(arg) \
|
|
do { *msg = tor_strdup(arg); goto err; } while (0)
|
|
|
|
/** DOCDOC */
|
|
int
|
|
validate_addr_policies(or_options_t *options, char **msg)
|
|
{
|
|
addr_policy_t *addr_policy=NULL;
|
|
*msg = NULL;
|
|
|
|
if (policies_parse_exit_policy(options->ExitPolicy, &addr_policy,
|
|
options->ExitPolicyRejectPrivate))
|
|
REJECT("Error in ExitPolicy entry.");
|
|
|
|
/* The rest of these calls *append* to addr_policy. So don't actually
|
|
* use the results for anything other than checking if they parse! */
|
|
if (parse_addr_policy(options->DirPolicy, &addr_policy, -1))
|
|
REJECT("Error in DirPolicy entry.");
|
|
if (parse_addr_policy(options->SocksPolicy, &addr_policy, -1))
|
|
REJECT("Error in SocksPolicy entry.");
|
|
if (parse_addr_policy(options->ReachableAddresses, &addr_policy,
|
|
ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPT))
|
|
REJECT("Error in ReachableAddresses entry.");
|
|
if (parse_addr_policy(options->ReachableORAddresses, &addr_policy,
|
|
ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPT))
|
|
REJECT("Error in ReachableORAddresses entry.");
|
|
if (parse_addr_policy(options->ReachableDirAddresses, &addr_policy,
|
|
ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPT))
|
|
REJECT("Error in ReachableDirAddresses entry.");
|
|
if (parse_addr_policy(options->AuthDirReject, &addr_policy,
|
|
ADDR_POLICY_REJECT))
|
|
REJECT("Error in AuthDirReject entry.");
|
|
if (parse_addr_policy(options->AuthDirInvalid, &addr_policy,
|
|
ADDR_POLICY_REJECT))
|
|
REJECT("Error in AuthDirInvalid entry.");
|
|
|
|
err:
|
|
addr_policy_free(addr_policy);
|
|
return *msg ? -1 : 0;
|
|
#undef REJECT
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Parse <b>string</b> in the same way that the exit policy
|
|
* is parsed, and put the processed version in *<b>policy</b>.
|
|
* Ignore port specifiers.
|
|
*/
|
|
static void
|
|
load_policy_from_option(config_line_t *config, addr_policy_t **policy,
|
|
int assume_action)
|
|
{
|
|
addr_policy_t *n;
|
|
addr_policy_free(*policy);
|
|
*policy = NULL;
|
|
parse_addr_policy(config, policy, assume_action);
|
|
/* ports aren't used. */
|
|
for (n=*policy; n; n = n->next) {
|
|
n->prt_min = 1;
|
|
n->prt_max = 65535;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** DOCDOC */
|
|
void
|
|
policies_parse_from_options(or_options_t *options)
|
|
{
|
|
load_policy_from_option(options->SocksPolicy, &socks_policy, -1);
|
|
load_policy_from_option(options->DirPolicy, &dir_policy, -1);
|
|
load_policy_from_option(options->AuthDirReject,
|
|
&authdir_reject_policy, ADDR_POLICY_REJECT);
|
|
load_policy_from_option(options->AuthDirInvalid,
|
|
&authdir_invalid_policy, ADDR_POLICY_REJECT);
|
|
load_policy_from_option(options->AuthDirBadExit,
|
|
&authdir_badexit_policy, ADDR_POLICY_REJECT);
|
|
parse_reachable_addresses();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Compare two provided address policy items, and return -1, 0, or 1
|
|
* if the first is less than, equal to, or greater than the second. */
|
|
static int
|
|
cmp_single_addr_policy(addr_policy_t *a, addr_policy_t *b)
|
|
{
|
|
int r;
|
|
if ((r=((int)a->policy_type - (int)b->policy_type)))
|
|
return r;
|
|
if ((r=((int)a->addr - (int)b->addr)))
|
|
return r;
|
|
if ((r=((int)a->msk - (int)b->msk)))
|
|
return r;
|
|
if ((r=((int)a->prt_min - (int)b->prt_min)))
|
|
return r;
|
|
if ((r=((int)a->prt_max - (int)b->prt_max)))
|
|
return r;
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Like cmp_single_addr_policy() above, but looks at the
|
|
* whole set of policies in each case. */
|
|
int
|
|
cmp_addr_policies(addr_policy_t *a, addr_policy_t *b)
|
|
{
|
|
int r;
|
|
while (a && b) {
|
|
if ((r=cmp_single_addr_policy(a,b)))
|
|
return r;
|
|
a = a->next;
|
|
b = b->next;
|
|
}
|
|
if (!a && !b)
|
|
return 0;
|
|
if (a)
|
|
return -1;
|
|
else
|
|
return 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Decide whether a given addr:port is definitely accepted,
|
|
* definitely rejected, probably accepted, or probably rejected by a
|
|
* given policy. If <b>addr</b> is 0, we don't know the IP of the
|
|
* target address. If <b>port</b> is 0, we don't know the port of the
|
|
* target address.
|
|
*
|
|
* For now, the algorithm is pretty simple: we look for definite and
|
|
* uncertain matches. The first definite match is what we guess; if
|
|
* it was preceded by no uncertain matches of the opposite policy,
|
|
* then the guess is definite; otherwise it is probable. (If we
|
|
* have a known addr and port, all matches are definite; if we have an
|
|
* unknown addr/port, any address/port ranges other than "all" are
|
|
* uncertain.)
|
|
*
|
|
* We could do better by assuming that some ranges never match typical
|
|
* addresses (127.0.0.1, and so on). But we'll try this for now.
|
|
*/
|
|
addr_policy_result_t
|
|
compare_addr_to_addr_policy(uint32_t addr, uint16_t port,
|
|
addr_policy_t *policy)
|
|
{
|
|
int maybe_reject = 0;
|
|
int maybe_accept = 0;
|
|
int match = 0;
|
|
int maybe = 0;
|
|
addr_policy_t *tmpe;
|
|
|
|
for (tmpe=policy; tmpe; tmpe=tmpe->next) {
|
|
maybe = 0;
|
|
if (!addr) {
|
|
/* Address is unknown. */
|
|
if ((port >= tmpe->prt_min && port <= tmpe->prt_max) ||
|
|
(!port && tmpe->prt_min<=1 && tmpe->prt_max>=65535)) {
|
|
/* The port definitely matches. */
|
|
if (tmpe->msk == 0) {
|
|
match = 1;
|
|
} else {
|
|
maybe = 1;
|
|
}
|
|
} else if (!port) {
|
|
/* The port maybe matches. */
|
|
maybe = 1;
|
|
}
|
|
} else {
|
|
/* Address is known */
|
|
if ((addr & tmpe->msk) == (tmpe->addr & tmpe->msk)) {
|
|
if (port >= tmpe->prt_min && port <= tmpe->prt_max) {
|
|
/* Exact match for the policy */
|
|
match = 1;
|
|
} else if (!port) {
|
|
maybe = 1;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if (maybe) {
|
|
if (tmpe->policy_type == ADDR_POLICY_REJECT)
|
|
maybe_reject = 1;
|
|
else
|
|
maybe_accept = 1;
|
|
}
|
|
if (match) {
|
|
if (tmpe->policy_type == ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPT) {
|
|
/* If we already hit a clause that might trigger a 'reject', than we
|
|
* can't be sure of this certain 'accept'.*/
|
|
return maybe_reject ? ADDR_POLICY_PROBABLY_ACCEPTED :
|
|
ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPTED;
|
|
} else {
|
|
return maybe_accept ? ADDR_POLICY_PROBABLY_REJECTED :
|
|
ADDR_POLICY_REJECTED;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
/* accept all by default. */
|
|
return maybe_reject ? ADDR_POLICY_PROBABLY_ACCEPTED : ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPTED;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Return true iff the address policy <b>a</b> covers every case that
|
|
* would be covered by <b>b</b>, so that a,b is redundant. */
|
|
static int
|
|
addr_policy_covers(addr_policy_t *a, addr_policy_t *b)
|
|
{
|
|
/* We can ignore accept/reject, since "accept *:80, reject *:80" reduces
|
|
* to "accept *:80". */
|
|
if (a->msk & ~b->msk) {
|
|
/* There's a wildcard bit in b->msk that's not a wildcard in a. */
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
if ((a->addr & a->msk) != (b->addr & a->msk)) {
|
|
/* There's a fixed bit in a that's set differently in b. */
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
return (a->prt_min <= b->prt_min && a->prt_max >= b->prt_max);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Return true iff the address policies <b>a</b> and <b>b</b> intersect,
|
|
* that is, there exists an address/port that is covered by <b>a</b> that
|
|
* is also covered by <b>b</b>.
|
|
*/
|
|
static int
|
|
addr_policy_intersects(addr_policy_t *a, addr_policy_t *b)
|
|
{
|
|
/* All the bits we care about are those that are set in both
|
|
* netmasks. If they are equal in a and b's networkaddresses
|
|
* then the networks intersect. If there is a difference,
|
|
* then they do not. */
|
|
if (((a->addr ^ b->addr) & a->msk & b->msk) != 0)
|
|
return 0;
|
|
if (a->prt_max < b->prt_min || b->prt_max < a->prt_min)
|
|
return 0;
|
|
return 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Add the exit policy described by <b>more</b> to <b>policy</b>.
|
|
*/
|
|
static void
|
|
append_exit_policy_string(addr_policy_t **policy, const char *more)
|
|
{
|
|
config_line_t tmp;
|
|
|
|
tmp.key = NULL;
|
|
tmp.value = (char*) more;
|
|
tmp.next = NULL;
|
|
parse_addr_policy(&tmp, policy, -1);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Detect and excise "dead code" from the policy *<b>dest</b>. */
|
|
static void
|
|
exit_policy_remove_redundancies(addr_policy_t **dest)
|
|
{
|
|
addr_policy_t *ap, *tmp, *victim, *previous;
|
|
|
|
/* Step one: find a *:* entry and cut off everything after it. */
|
|
for (ap=*dest; ap; ap=ap->next) {
|
|
if (ap->msk == 0 && ap->prt_min <= 1 && ap->prt_max >= 65535) {
|
|
/* This is a catch-all line -- later lines are unreachable. */
|
|
if (ap->next) {
|
|
addr_policy_free(ap->next);
|
|
ap->next = NULL;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Step two: for every entry, see if there's a redundant entry
|
|
* later on, and remove it. */
|
|
for (ap=*dest; ap; ap=ap->next) {
|
|
tmp=ap;
|
|
while (tmp) {
|
|
if (tmp->next && addr_policy_covers(ap, tmp->next)) {
|
|
log(LOG_DEBUG, LD_CONFIG, "Removing exit policy %s. It is made "
|
|
"redundant by %s.", tmp->next->string, ap->string);
|
|
victim = tmp->next;
|
|
tmp->next = victim->next;
|
|
victim->next = NULL;
|
|
addr_policy_free(victim);
|
|
} else {
|
|
tmp=tmp->next;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Step three: for every entry A, see if there's an entry B making this one
|
|
* redundant later on. This is the case if A and B are of the same type
|
|
* (accept/reject), A is a subset of B, and there is no other entry of
|
|
* different type in between those two that intersects with A.
|
|
*
|
|
* Anybody want to doublecheck the logic here? XXX
|
|
*/
|
|
ap = *dest;
|
|
previous = NULL;
|
|
while (ap) {
|
|
for (tmp=ap->next; tmp; tmp=tmp->next) {
|
|
if (ap->policy_type != tmp->policy_type &&
|
|
addr_policy_intersects(ap, tmp)) {
|
|
tmp = NULL; /* so that we advance previous and ap */
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
if (ap->policy_type == tmp->policy_type &&
|
|
addr_policy_covers(tmp, ap)) {
|
|
log(LOG_DEBUG, LD_CONFIG, "Removing exit policy %s. It is already "
|
|
"covered by %s.", ap->string, tmp->string);
|
|
victim = ap;
|
|
ap = ap->next;
|
|
|
|
if (previous) {
|
|
assert(previous->next == victim);
|
|
previous->next = victim->next;
|
|
} else {
|
|
assert(*dest == victim);
|
|
*dest = victim->next;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
victim->next = NULL;
|
|
addr_policy_free(victim);
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if (!tmp) {
|
|
previous = ap;
|
|
ap = ap->next;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#define DEFAULT_EXIT_POLICY \
|
|
"reject *:25,reject *:119,reject *:135-139,reject *:445," \
|
|
"reject *:465,reject *:563,reject *:587," \
|
|
"reject *:1214,reject *:4661-4666," \
|
|
"reject *:6346-6429,reject *:6699,reject *:6881-6999,accept *:*"
|
|
|
|
/** Parse the exit policy <b>cfg</b> into the linked list *<b>dest</b>. If
|
|
* cfg doesn't end in an absolute accept or reject, add the default exit
|
|
* policy afterwards. If <b>rejectprivate</b> is true, prepend
|
|
* "reject private:*" to the policy. Return -1 if we can't parse cfg,
|
|
* else return 0.
|
|
*/
|
|
int
|
|
policies_parse_exit_policy(config_line_t *cfg, addr_policy_t **dest,
|
|
int rejectprivate)
|
|
{
|
|
if (rejectprivate)
|
|
append_exit_policy_string(dest, "reject private:*");
|
|
if (parse_addr_policy(cfg, dest, -1))
|
|
return -1;
|
|
append_exit_policy_string(dest, DEFAULT_EXIT_POLICY);
|
|
|
|
exit_policy_remove_redundancies(dest);
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Return true iff <b>ri</b> is "useful as an exit node", meaning
|
|
* it allows exit to at least one /8 address space for at least
|
|
* two of ports 80, 443, and 6667. */
|
|
int
|
|
exit_policy_is_general_exit(addr_policy_t *policy)
|
|
{
|
|
static const int ports[] = { 80, 443, 6667 };
|
|
int n_allowed = 0;
|
|
int i;
|
|
for (i = 0; i < 3; ++i) {
|
|
struct addr_policy_t *p = policy;
|
|
for ( ; p; p = p->next) {
|
|
if (p->prt_min > ports[i] || p->prt_max < ports[i])
|
|
continue; /* Doesn't cover our port. */
|
|
if ((p->msk & 0x00fffffful) != 0)
|
|
continue; /* Narrower than a /8. */
|
|
if ((p->addr & 0xff000000ul) == 0x7f000000ul)
|
|
continue; /* 127.x */
|
|
/* We have a match that is at least a /8. */
|
|
if (p->policy_type == ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPT) {
|
|
++n_allowed;
|
|
break; /* stop considering this port */
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return n_allowed >= 2;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Return false if <b>policy</b> might permit access to some addr:port;
|
|
* otherwise if we are certain it rejects everything, return true. */
|
|
int
|
|
policy_is_reject_star(addr_policy_t *p)
|
|
{
|
|
for ( ; p; p = p->next) {
|
|
if (p->policy_type == ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPT)
|
|
return 0;
|
|
else if (p->policy_type == ADDR_POLICY_REJECT &&
|
|
p->prt_min <= 1 && p->prt_max == 65535 &&
|
|
p->msk == 0)
|
|
return 1;
|
|
}
|
|
return 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Write a single address policy to the buf_len byte buffer at buf. Return
|
|
* the number of characters written, or -1 on failure. */
|
|
int
|
|
policy_write_item(char *buf, size_t buflen, addr_policy_t *policy)
|
|
{
|
|
struct in_addr in;
|
|
size_t written = 0;
|
|
char addrbuf[INET_NTOA_BUF_LEN];
|
|
int result;
|
|
|
|
in.s_addr = htonl(policy->addr);
|
|
tor_inet_ntoa(&in, addrbuf, sizeof(addrbuf));
|
|
/* write accept/reject 1.2.3.4 */
|
|
result = tor_snprintf(buf, buflen, "%s %s",
|
|
policy->policy_type == ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPT ? "accept" : "reject",
|
|
policy->msk == 0 ? "*" : addrbuf);
|
|
if (result < 0)
|
|
return -1;
|
|
written += strlen(buf);
|
|
/* If the mask is 0xffffffff, we don't need to give it. If the mask is 0,
|
|
* we already wrote "*". */
|
|
if (policy->msk != 0xFFFFFFFFu && policy->msk != 0) {
|
|
int n_bits = addr_mask_get_bits(policy->msk);
|
|
if (n_bits >= 0) {
|
|
if (tor_snprintf(buf+written, buflen-written, "/%d", n_bits)<0)
|
|
return -1;
|
|
} else {
|
|
/* Write "/255.255.0.0" */
|
|
in.s_addr = htonl(policy->msk);
|
|
tor_inet_ntoa(&in, addrbuf, sizeof(addrbuf));
|
|
if (tor_snprintf(buf+written, buflen-written, "/%s", addrbuf)<0)
|
|
return -1;
|
|
}
|
|
written += strlen(buf+written);
|
|
}
|
|
if (policy->prt_min <= 1 && policy->prt_max == 65535) {
|
|
/* There is no port set; write ":*" */
|
|
if (written+4 > buflen)
|
|
return -1;
|
|
strlcat(buf+written, ":*", buflen-written);
|
|
written += 2;
|
|
} else if (policy->prt_min == policy->prt_max) {
|
|
/* There is only one port; write ":80". */
|
|
result = tor_snprintf(buf+written, buflen-written, ":%d", policy->prt_min);
|
|
if (result<0)
|
|
return -1;
|
|
written += result;
|
|
} else {
|
|
/* There is a range of ports; write ":79-80". */
|
|
result = tor_snprintf(buf+written, buflen-written, ":%d-%d",
|
|
policy->prt_min, policy->prt_max);
|
|
if (result<0)
|
|
return -1;
|
|
written += result;
|
|
}
|
|
if (written < buflen)
|
|
buf[written] = '\0';
|
|
else
|
|
return -1;
|
|
|
|
return (int)written;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** DOCDOC */
|
|
int
|
|
getinfo_helper_policies(control_connection_t *conn,
|
|
const char *question, char **answer)
|
|
{
|
|
(void) conn;
|
|
if (!strcmp(question, "exit-policy/default")) {
|
|
*answer = tor_strdup(DEFAULT_EXIT_POLICY);
|
|
}
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Release all storage held by <b>p</b> */
|
|
void
|
|
addr_policy_free(addr_policy_t *p)
|
|
{
|
|
addr_policy_t *e;
|
|
|
|
while (p) {
|
|
e = p;
|
|
p = p->next;
|
|
tor_free(e->string);
|
|
tor_free(e);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** DOCDOC */
|
|
void
|
|
policies_free_all(void)
|
|
{
|
|
addr_policy_free(reachable_or_addr_policy);
|
|
reachable_or_addr_policy = NULL;
|
|
addr_policy_free(reachable_dir_addr_policy);
|
|
reachable_dir_addr_policy = NULL;
|
|
addr_policy_free(socks_policy);
|
|
socks_policy = NULL;
|
|
addr_policy_free(dir_policy);
|
|
dir_policy = NULL;
|
|
addr_policy_free(authdir_reject_policy);
|
|
authdir_reject_policy = NULL;
|
|
addr_policy_free(authdir_invalid_policy);
|
|
authdir_invalid_policy = NULL;
|
|
}
|
|
|