mirror of
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor.git
synced 2024-11-28 06:13:31 +01:00
246 lines
9.5 KiB
Markdown
246 lines
9.5 KiB
Markdown
Coding conventions for Tor
|
|
==========================
|
|
|
|
tl;dr:
|
|
|
|
- Run configure with `--enable-fatal-warnings`
|
|
- Run `make check-spaces` to catch whitespace errors
|
|
- Document your functions
|
|
- Write unit tests
|
|
- Add a file in `changes` for your branch.
|
|
|
|
Patch checklist
|
|
---------------
|
|
|
|
If possible, send your patch as one of these (in descending order of
|
|
preference)
|
|
|
|
- A git branch we can pull from
|
|
- Patches generated by git format-patch
|
|
- A unified diff
|
|
|
|
Did you remember...
|
|
|
|
- To build your code while configured with `--enable-fatal-warnings`?
|
|
- To run `make check-spaces` on your code?
|
|
- To run `make check-docs` to see whether all new options are on
|
|
the manpage?
|
|
- To write unit tests, as possible?
|
|
- To base your code on the appropriate branch?
|
|
- To include a file in the `changes` directory as appropriate?
|
|
|
|
How we use Git branches
|
|
=======================
|
|
|
|
Each main development series (like 0.2.1, 0.2.2, etc) has its main work
|
|
applied to a single branch. At most one series can be the development series
|
|
at a time; all other series are maintenance series that get bug-fixes only.
|
|
The development series is built in a git branch called "master"; the
|
|
maintenance series are built in branches called "maint-0.2.0", "maint-0.2.1",
|
|
and so on. We regularly merge the active maint branches forward.
|
|
|
|
For all series except the development series, we also have a "release" branch
|
|
(as in "release-0.2.1"). The release series is based on the corresponding
|
|
maintenance series, except that it deliberately lags the maint series for
|
|
most of its patches, so that bugfix patches are not typically included in a
|
|
maintenance release until they've been tested for a while in a development
|
|
release. Occasionally, we'll merge an urgent bugfix into the release branch
|
|
before it gets merged into maint, but that's rare.
|
|
|
|
If you're working on a bugfix for a bug that occurs in a particular version,
|
|
base your bugfix branch on the "maint" branch for the first supported series
|
|
that has that bug. (As of June 2013, we're supporting 0.2.3 and later.) If
|
|
you're working on a new feature, base it on the master branch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
How we log changes
|
|
==================
|
|
|
|
When you do a commit that needs a ChangeLog entry, add a new file to
|
|
the `changes` toplevel subdirectory. It should have the format of a
|
|
one-entry changelog section from the current ChangeLog file, as in
|
|
|
|
- Major bugfixes:
|
|
- Fix a potential buffer overflow. Fixes bug 99999; bugfix on
|
|
0.3.1.4-beta.
|
|
|
|
To write a changes file, first categorize the change. Some common categories
|
|
are: Minor bugfixes, Major bugfixes, Minor features, Major features, Code
|
|
simplifications and refactoring. Then say what the change does. If
|
|
it's a bugfix, mention what bug it fixes and when the bug was
|
|
introduced. To find out which Git tag the change was introduced in,
|
|
you can use `git describe --contains <sha1 of commit>`.
|
|
|
|
If at all possible, try to create this file in the same commit where you are
|
|
making the change. Please give it a distinctive name that no other branch will
|
|
use for the lifetime of your change. To verify the format of the changes file,
|
|
you can use `make check-changes`.
|
|
|
|
When we go to make a release, we will concatenate all the entries
|
|
in changes to make a draft changelog, and clear the directory. We'll
|
|
then edit the draft changelog into a nice readable format.
|
|
|
|
To make sure that stuff is in the right format, we use
|
|
scripts/maint/lintChanges.py to check the changes files for
|
|
(superficial) validity. You can run this script on your own changes
|
|
files!
|
|
|
|
What needs a changes file?
|
|
|
|
* A not-exhaustive list: Anything that might change user-visible
|
|
behavior. Anything that changes internals, documentation, or the build
|
|
system enough that somebody could notice. Big or interesting code
|
|
rewrites. Anything about which somebody might plausibly wonder "when
|
|
did that happen, and/or why did we do that" 6 months down the line.
|
|
|
|
Why use changes files instead of Git commit messages?
|
|
|
|
* Git commit messages are written for developers, not users, and they
|
|
are nigh-impossible to revise after the fact.
|
|
|
|
Why use changes files instead of entries in the ChangeLog?
|
|
|
|
* Having every single commit touch the ChangeLog file tended to create
|
|
zillions of merge conflicts.
|
|
|
|
Whitespace and C conformance
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
Invoke `make check-spaces` from time to time, so it can tell you about
|
|
deviations from our C whitespace style. Generally, we use:
|
|
|
|
- Unix-style line endings
|
|
- K&R-style indentation
|
|
- No space before newlines
|
|
- A blank line at the end of each file
|
|
- Never more than one blank line in a row
|
|
- Always spaces, never tabs
|
|
- No more than 79-columns per line.
|
|
- Two spaces per indent.
|
|
- A space between control keywords and their corresponding paren
|
|
`if (x)`, `while (x)`, and `switch (x)`, never `if(x)`, `while(x)`, or
|
|
`switch(x)`.
|
|
- A space between anything and an open brace.
|
|
- No space between a function name and an opening paren. `puts(x)`, not
|
|
`puts (x)`.
|
|
- Function declarations at the start of the line.
|
|
|
|
We try hard to build without warnings everywhere. In particular, if
|
|
you're using gcc, you should invoke the configure script with the
|
|
option `--enable-fatal-warnings`. This will tell the compiler
|
|
to make all warnings into errors.
|
|
|
|
Functions to use; functions not to use
|
|
--------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
We have some wrapper functions like `tor_malloc`, `tor_free`, `tor_strdup`, and
|
|
`tor_gettimeofday;` use them instead of their generic equivalents. (They
|
|
always succeed or exit.)
|
|
|
|
You can get a full list of the compatibility functions that Tor provides by
|
|
looking through `src/common/util*.h` and `src/common/compat*.h`. You can see the
|
|
available containers in `src/common/containers*.h`. You should probably
|
|
familiarize yourself with these modules before you write too much code, or
|
|
else you'll wind up reinventing the wheel.
|
|
|
|
We don't use `strcat` or `strcpy` or `sprintf` of any of those notoriously broken
|
|
old C functions. Use `strlcat`, `strlcpy`, or `tor_snprintf/tor_asprintf` instead.
|
|
|
|
We don't call `memcmp()` directly. Use `fast_memeq()`, `fast_memneq()`,
|
|
`tor_memeq()`, or `tor_memneq()` for most purposes.
|
|
|
|
Functions not to write
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
Try to never hand-write new code to parse or generate binary
|
|
formats. Instead, use trunnel if at all possible. See
|
|
|
|
https://gitweb.torproject.org/trunnel.git/tree
|
|
|
|
for more information about trunnel.
|
|
|
|
For information on adding new trunnel code to Tor, see src/trunnel/README
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calling and naming conventions
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Whenever possible, functions should return -1 on error and 0 on success.
|
|
|
|
For multi-word identifiers, use lowercase words combined with
|
|
underscores. (e.g., `multi_word_identifier`). Use ALL_CAPS for macros and
|
|
constants.
|
|
|
|
Typenames should end with `_t`.
|
|
|
|
Function names should be prefixed with a module name or object name. (In
|
|
general, code to manipulate an object should be a module with the same name
|
|
as the object, so it's hard to tell which convention is used.)
|
|
|
|
Functions that do things should have imperative-verb names
|
|
(e.g. `buffer_clear`, `buffer_resize`); functions that return booleans should
|
|
have predicate names (e.g. `buffer_is_empty`, `buffer_needs_resizing`).
|
|
|
|
If you find that you have four or more possible return code values, it's
|
|
probably time to create an enum. If you find that you are passing three or
|
|
more flags to a function, it's probably time to create a flags argument that
|
|
takes a bitfield.
|
|
|
|
What To Optimize
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
Don't optimize anything if it's not in the critical path. Right now, the
|
|
critical path seems to be AES, logging, and the network itself. Feel free to
|
|
do your own profiling to determine otherwise.
|
|
|
|
Log conventions
|
|
---------------
|
|
|
|
`https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq#LogLevel`
|
|
|
|
No error or warning messages should be expected during normal OR or OP
|
|
operation.
|
|
|
|
If a library function is currently called such that failure always means ERR,
|
|
then the library function should log WARN and let the caller log ERR.
|
|
|
|
Every message of severity INFO or higher should either (A) be intelligible
|
|
to end-users who don't know the Tor source; or (B) somehow inform the
|
|
end-users that they aren't expected to understand the message (perhaps
|
|
with a string like "internal error"). Option (A) is to be preferred to
|
|
option (B).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doxygen comment conventions
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
|
|
Say what functions do as a series of one or more imperative sentences, as
|
|
though you were telling somebody how to be the function. In other words, DO
|
|
NOT say:
|
|
|
|
/** The strtol function parses a number.
|
|
*
|
|
* nptr -- the string to parse. It can include whitespace.
|
|
* endptr -- a string pointer to hold the first thing that is not part
|
|
* of the number, if present.
|
|
* base -- the numeric base.
|
|
* returns: the resulting number.
|
|
*/
|
|
long strtol(const char *nptr, char **nptr, int base);
|
|
|
|
Instead, please DO say:
|
|
|
|
/** Parse a number in radix <b>base</b> from the string <b>nptr</b>,
|
|
* and return the result. Skip all leading whitespace. If
|
|
* <b>endptr</b> is not NULL, set *<b>endptr</b> to the first character
|
|
* after the number parsed.
|
|
**/
|
|
long strtol(const char *nptr, char **nptr, int base);
|
|
|
|
Doxygen comments are the contract in our abstraction-by-contract world: if
|
|
the functions that call your function rely on it doing something, then your
|
|
function should mention that it does that something in the documentation. If
|
|
you rely on a function doing something beyond what is in its documentation,
|
|
then you should watch out, or it might do something else later.
|