Filename: 151-path-selection-improvements.txt Title: Improving Tor Path Selection Author: Fallon Chen, Mike Perry Created: 5-Jul-2008 Status: Draft Overview The performance of paths selected can be improved by adjusting the CircuitBuildTimeout and avoiding failing guard nodes. This proposal describes a method of tracking buildtime statistics at the client, and using those statistics to adjust the CircuitBuildTimeout. Motivation Tor's performance can be improved by excluding those circuits that have long buildtimes (and by extension, high latency). For those Tor users who require better performance and have lower requirements for anonymity, this would be a very useful option to have. Implementation Storing Build Times Circuit build times will be stored in the circular array 'circuit_build_times' consisting of uint16_t elements as milliseconds. The total size of this array will be based on the number of circuits it takes to converge on a good fit of the long term distribution of the circuit builds for a fixed link. We do not want this value to be too large, because it will make it difficult for clients to adapt to moving between different links. From our initial observations, this value appears to be on the order of 1000, but will be configurable in a #define NCIRCUITS_TO_OBSERVE. The exact value for this #define will be determined by performing goodness of fit tests using measurments obtained from the shufflebt.py script from TorFlow. Long Term Storage The long-term storage representation will be implemented by storing a histogram with BUILDTIME_BIN_WIDTH millisecond buckets (default 50) when writing out the statistics to disk. The format of this histogram on disk is yet to be finalized, but it will likely be of the format 'CircuitBuildTime ', with the total specified as 'TotalBuildTimes ' Example: TotalBuildTimes 100 CircuitBuildTimeBin 1 50 CircuitBuildTimeBin 2 25 CircuitBuildTimeBin 3 13 ... Reading the histogram in will entail multiplying each bin by the BUILDTIME_BIN_WIDTH and then inserting values into the circuit_build_times array each with the value of *BUILDTIME_BIN_WIDTH. In order to evenly distribute the values in the circular array, a form of index skipping must be employed. Values from bin #N with bin count C and total T will occupy indexes specified by N+((T/C)*k)-1, where k is the set of integers ranging from 0 to C-1. For example, this would mean that the values from bin 1 would occupy indexes 1+(100/50)*k-1, or 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and so on. The values for bin 2 would occupy positions 1, 5, 9, 13. Collisions will be inserted at the first empty position in the array greater than the selected index (which may requiring looping around the array back to index 0). Learning the CircuitBuildTimeout Based on studies of build times, we found that the distribution of circuit buildtimes appears to be a Pareto distribution. We will calculate the parameters for a Pareto distribution fitting the data using the estimators at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_distribution#Parameter_estimation. The timeout itself will be calculated by solving the CDF for the a percentile cutoff BUILDTIME_PERCENT_CUTOFF. This value represents the percentage of paths the Tor client will accept out of the total number of paths. We have not yet determined a good cutoff for this mathematically, but 85% seems a good choice for now. From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_distribution#Definition, the calculation we need is pow(BUILDTIME_PERCENT_CUTOFF/100.0, k)/Xm. Testing After circuit build times, storage, and learning are implemented, the resulting histogram should be checked for consistency by verifying it persists across successive Tor invocations where no circuits are built. In addition, we can also use the existing buildtime scripts to record build times, and verify that the histogram the python produces matches that which is output to the state file in Tor, and verify that the Pareto parameters and cutoff points also match. Soft timeout vs Hard Timeout At some point, it may be desirable to change the cutoff from a single hard cutoff that destroys the circuit to a soft cutoff and a hard cutoff, where the soft cutoff merely triggers the building of a new circuit, and the hard cutoff triggers destruction of the circuit. Good values for hard and soft cutoffs seem to be 85% and 65% respectively, but we should eventually justify this with observation. When to Begin Calculation The number of circuits to observe (NCIRCUITS_TO_CUTOFF) before changing the CircuitBuildTimeout will be tunable via a #define. From our measurements, a good value for NCIRCUITS_TO_CUTOFF appears to be on the order of 100. Dealing with Timeouts Timeouts should be counted as the expectation of the region of of the Pareto distribution beyond the cutoff. The proposal will be updated with this value soon. Also, in the event of network failure, the observation mechanism should stop collecting timeout data. Client Hints Some research still needs to be done to provide initial values for CircuitBuildTimeout based on values learned from modem users, DSL users, Cable Modem users, and dedicated links. A radiobutton in Vidalia should eventually be provided that sets CircuitBuildTimeout to one of these values and also provide the option of purging all learned data, should any exist. These values can either be published in the directory, or shipped hardcoded for a particular Tor version. Issues Impact on anonymity Since this follows a Pareto distribution, large reductions on the timeout can be achieved without cutting off a great number of the total paths. This will eliminate a great deal of the performance variation of Tor usage.