We also had to alter the SRV functions to take a consensus as optional
input, since we might be setting our HSDir index using a consensus that
is currently being processed and won't be returned by the
networkstatus_get_live_consensus() function.
This change has two results:
a) It makes sure we are using a fresh consensus with the right SRV value
when we are calculating the HSDir hash ring.
b) It ensures that we will not use the sr_get_current/previous()
functions when we don't have a consensus which would have falsely
triggered the disaster SRV logic.
In Nick's words:
"We want to always return false if the platform is a Tor version, and it
is not as new as 0.3.0.8 -- but if the platform is not a Tor version, or
if the version is as new as 0.3.0.8, then we want to obey the protocol
list.
That way, other implementations of our protocol won't have to claim any
particular Tor version, and future versions of Tor will have the freedom
to drop this protocol in the distant future."
This hsdir index value is used to give an index value to all node_t (relays)
that supports HSDir v3. An index value is then computed using the blinded key
to know where to fetch/upload the service descriptor from/to.
To avoid computing that index value everytime the client/service needs it, we
do that everytime we get a new consensus which then doesn't change until the
next one. The downside is that we need to sort them once we need to compute
the set of responsible HSDir.
Finally, the "hs_index" function is also added but not used. It will be used
in later commits to compute which node_t is a responsible HSDir for the
service we want to fetch/upload the descriptor.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
When the new path selection logic went into place, I accidentally
dropped the code that considered the _family_ of the exit node when
deciding if the guard was usable, and we didn't catch that during
code review.
This patch makes the guard_restriction_t code consider the exit
family as well, and adds some (hopefully redundant) checks for the
case where we lack a node_t for a guard but we have a bridge_info_t
for it.
Fixes bug 22753; bugfix on 0.3.0.1-alpha. Tracked as TROVE-2016-006
and CVE-2017-0377.
This introduces node_supports_v3_hsdir() and node_supports_ed25519_hs_intro()
that checks the routerstatus_t of a node and if not present, checks the
routerinfo_t.
This is groundwork for proposal 224 service implementation in #20657.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
In addition to not wanting to build circuits until we can see most
of the paths in the network, and in addition to not wanting to build
circuits until we have a consensus ... we shouldn't build circuits
till all of our (in-use) primary guards have descriptors that we can
use for them.
This is another bug 21242 fix.
The microdesc consensus does not contain any IPv6 addresses.
When a client has a microdesc consensus but no microdescriptor, make it
use the hard-coded IPv6 address for the node (if available).
(Hard-coded addresses can come from authorities, fallback directories,
or configured bridges.)
If there is no hard-coded address, log a BUG message, and fail the
connection attempt. (All existing code checks for a hard-coded address
before choosing a node address.)
Fixes 20996, fix on b167e82 from 19608 in 0.2.8.5-alpha.
This patch makes two absolutely critical changes:
- If an ed25519 identity is not as expected when creating a channel,
we call that channel unsuccessful and close it.
- When a client creating a channel or an extend cell for a circuit, we
only include the ed25519 identity if we believe that the node on
the other side supports ed25519 link authentication (from
#15055). Otherwise we will insist on nodes without the right
link protocol authenticating themselves.
- When deciding to extend to another relay, we only upgrade the
extend to extend by ed25519 ID when we know the ed25519 ID _and_
we know that the other side can authenticate.
This patch also tells directory servers, when probing nodes, to
try to check their ed25519 identities too (if they can authenticate
by ed25519 identity).
Also, handle the case where we connect by RSA Id, and learn the
ED25519 ID for the node in doing so.
Rely on onion_populate_cpath to check that we're only using
TAP for the rare hidden service cases.
Check and log if handshakes only support TAP when they should support
ntor.
If we know a node's version, and it can't do ntor, consider it not running.
If we have a node's descriptor, and it doesn't have a valid ntor key,
consider it not running.
Refactor these checks so they're consistent between authorities and clients.
There was a > that should have been an ==, and a missing !. These
together prevented us from issuing a warning in the case that a
nickname matched an Unnamed node only.
Fixes bug 19203; bugfix on 0.2.3.1-alpha.
When ClientPreferIPv6ORPort is auto, bridges prefer the configured
bridge ORPort address. Otherwise, they use the value of the option.
Other clients prefer IPv4 ORPorts if ClientPreferIPv6ORPort is auto.
When ClientPreferIPv6DirPort is auto, all clients prefer IPv4 DirPorts.
Bridge clients ignore ClientUseIPv6, acting as if it is always 1.
This preserves existing behaviour.
Make ClientPreferIPv6OR/DirPort auto by default:
* Bridge clients prefer IPv6 by default.
* Other clients prefer IPv4 by default.
This preserves existing behaviour.
ClientUseIPv4 0 tells tor to avoid IPv4 client connections.
ClientPreferIPv6DirPort 1 tells tor to prefer IPv6 directory connections.
Refactor policy for IPv4/IPv6 preferences.
Fix a bug where node->ipv6_preferred could become stale if
ClientPreferIPv6ORPort was changed after the consensus was loaded.
Update documentation, existing code, add unit tests.
node_get_all_orports and router_get_all_orports incorrectly used or_port
with IPv6 addresses. They now use ipv6_orport.
Also refactor and remove duplicated code.
We already log whenever our state changes, e.g. whenever new directory
information arrives. This additional log_warn() will at best just add more
log messages, or worse, make the user wonder what she needs to fix.
(Changed after consultation with Yawning.)
