We don't actually want Coverity to complain when a BUG() check can
never fail, since such checks can prevent us from introducing bugs
later on.
Closes ticket 23054. Closes CID 1415720, 1415724.
Now that half the threads are permissive and half are strict, we
need to make sure we have at least two threads, so that we'll
have at least one of each kind.
Each piece of queued work now has an associated priority value; each
priority goes on a separate queue.
With probability (N-1)/N, the workers will take work from the highest
priority nonempty queue. Otherwise, they'll look for work in a
queue of lower priority. This behavior is meant to prevent
starvation for lower-priority tasks.
In the Linux kernel, the BUG() macro causes an instant panic. Our
BUG() macro is different, however: it generates a nonfatal assertion
failure, and is usable as an expression.
Additionally, this patch tells util_bug.h to make all assertion
failures into fatal conditions when we're building with a static
analysis tool, so that the analysis tool can look for instances
where they're reachable.
Fixes bug 23030.
Wow, it sure seems like some compilers can't implement isnan() and
friends in a way that pleases themselves!
Fixes bug 22915. Bug trigged by 0.2.8.1-alpha and later; caused by
clang 4.
We need to keep these around for TAP and old-style hidden services,
but they're obsolete, and we shouldn't encourage anyone to use them.
So I've added "obsolete" to their names, and a comment explaining
what the problem is.
Closes ticket 23026.
In zstd 1.3.0, once you have called ZSTD_endStream and been told
that your putput buffer is full, it really doesn't want you to call
ZSTD_compressStream again. ZSTD 1.2.0 didn't seem to mind about
this.
This patch fixes the issue by making sure never to call
ZSTD_endStream if there's any more data on the input buffer to
process, by flushing even when we're about to call "endStream", and
by never calling "compress" or "flush" after "endStream".
Fix for 22924. Bugfix on 0.2.9.1-alpha when the test was introducd
-- though it couldn't actually overflow until we fixed 17750.
Additionally, this only seems to overflow on 32-bit, and only when
the compiler doesn't re-order the (possibly dead) assignment out of
the way. We ran into it on a 32-bit ubuntu trusty builder.
Clang didn't like that we were passing uint64_t values to an API
that wanted uint32_t. GCC has either not cared, or has figured out
that the values in question were safe to cast to uint32_t.
Fixes bug22916; bugfix on 0.2.7.2-alpha.
