When we added HTTPTunnelPort, the answer that we give when you try
to use your SOCKSPort as an HTTP proxy became wrong. Now we explain
that Tor sorta _is_ an HTTP proxy, but a SOCKSPort isn't.
I have left the status line the same, in case anything is depending
on it. I have removed the extra padding for Internet Explorer,
since the message is well over 512 bytes without it.
Fixes bug 23678; bugfix on 0.3.2.1-alpha.
Without this fix, changes from client to bridge don't trigger
transition_affects_workers(), so we would never have actually
initialized the cpuworkers.
Fixes bug 23693. Bugfix on 3bcdb26267 0.2.6.3-alpha, which
fixed bug 14901 in the general case, but not on the case where
public_server_mode() did not change.
Because our monotonic time interface doesn't play well with value set to 0,
always initialize to now() the scheduler_last_run at init() of the KIST
scheduler.
Fixes#23696
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
When a channel is scheduled and flush cells returns 0 that is no cells to
flush, we flag it back in waiting for cells so it doesn't get stuck in a
possible infinite loop.
It has been observed on moria1 where a closed channel end up in the scheduler
where the flush process returned 0 cells but it was ultimately kept in the
scheduling loop forever. We suspect that this is due to a more deeper problem
in tor where the channel_more_to_flush() is actually looking at the wrong
queue and was returning 1 for an empty channel thus putting the channel in the
"Case 4" of the scheduler which is to go back in pending state thus
re-considered at the next iteration.
This is a fix that allows the KIST scheduler to recover properly from a not
entirelly diagnosed problem in tor.
Fixes#23676
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
When we added single_conn_free_bytes(), we cleared the outbuf on a
connection without setting outbuf_flushlen() to 0. This could cause
an assertion failure later on in flush_buf().
Fixes bug 23690; bugfix on 0.2.6.1-alpha.
This caused a BUG log when we noticed that the circuit had no
channel. The likeliest culprit for exposing that behavior is
d769cab3e5, where we made circuit_mark_for_close() NULL out
the n_chan and p_chan fields of the circuit.
Fixes bug 8185; bugfix on 0.2.5.4-alpha, I think.
My current theory is that this is just a marked circuit that hasn't
closed yet, but let's gather more information in case that theory is
wrong.
Diagnostic for 8185.
This patch ensures that we return TOR_COMPRESS_BUFFER_FULL in case we
have a input bytes left to process, but are out of output buffer or in
case we need to finish where the compression implementation might need
to write an epilogue.
See: https://bugs.torproject.org/23551
This patch ensures that we return TOR_COMPRESS_BUFFER_FULL in case we
have a input bytes left to process, but are out of output buffer or in
case we need to finish where the compression implementation might need
to write an epilogue.
See: https://bugs.torproject.org/23551
If 6 SOCKS requests are opened at once, it would have triggered 6 fetches
which ultimately poke all 6 HSDir. We don't want that, if we have multiple
SOCKS requests for the same service, do one fetch only.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
When purging last HSDir requests, we used time(NULL) for computing the
service blinded key but in all other places in our codebase we actually
use the consensus times. That can cause wrong behavior if the consensus
is in a different time period than time(NULL).
This commit is required for proper purging of HSDir requests.
