Two non fatal asserts are added in this commit. First one is to see if the
SENDME digest list kept on the circuit for validation ever grows bigger than
the maximum number of expected SENDME on a circuit (currently 10).
The second one is to know if we ever send more than one SENDME at a time on a
circuit. In theory, we shouldn't but if we ever do, the v1 implementation
wouldn't work because we only keep one single cell digest (the previous cell
to the SENDME) on the circuit/cpath. Thus, sending two SENDME consecutively
will lead to a mismatch on the other side because the same cell digest would
be use and thus the circuit would collapse.
Finally, add an extra debug log in case we emit a v0 which also includes the
consensus emit version in that case.
Part of #30428
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
We must not accumulate digests on the circuit if the other end point is using
another SENDME version that is not using those digests like v0.
This commit makes it that we always pop the digest regardless of the version.
Part of #30428
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Commit 4ef8470fa5480d3b was actually reverted before because in the end we
needed to do this minus 1 check on the window.
This commit clarifies that in the code, takes the useful comment changes from
4ef8470fa5480d3b and makes sendme_circuit_cell_is_next() private since it
behaves in a very specific way that one external caller might expect.
Part of #30428.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Turns out that we were only recording the "b_digest" but to have
bidirectionnal authenticated SENDMEs, we need to use the "f_digest" in the
forward cell situation.
Because of the cpath refactoring, this commit plays with the crypt_path_ and
relay_crypto_t API a little bit in order to respect the abstractions.
Previously, we would record the cell digest as the SENDME digest in the
decrypt cell function but to avoid code duplication (both directions needs to
record), we now do that right after iff the cell is recognized (at the edge).
It is now done in circuit_receive_relay_cell() instead.
We now also record the cell digest as the SENDME digest in both relay cell
encryption functions since they are split depending on the direction.
relay_encrypt_cell_outbound() and relay_encrypt_cell_inbound() need to
consider recording the cell digest depending on their direction (f vs b
digest).
Fixes#30428
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
There was a missing cell version check against our max supported version. In
other words, we do not fallback to v0 anymore in case we do know the SENDME
version.
We can either handle it or not, never fallback to the unauthenticated version
in order to avoid gaming the authenticated logic.
Add a unit tests making sure we properly test that and also test that we can
always handle the default emit and accepted versions.
Fixes#30428
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
The validation of the SENDME cell is now done as the very first thing when
receiving it for both client and exit. On failure to validate, the circuit is
closed as detailed in the specification.
Part of #30428
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
It turns out that only the exit side is validating the authenticated SENDME v1
logic and never the client side. Which means that if a client ever uploaded
data towards an exit, the authenticated SENDME logic wouldn't apply.
For this to work, we have to record the cell digest client side as well which
introduced a new function that supports both type of edges.
This also removes a test that is not valid anymore which was that we didn't
allow cell recording on an origin circuit (client).
Part of #30428
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
The client side had garbage histograms and deadcode here, too. That code has
been removed.
The tests have also been updated to properly test the intro circ by sending
padding from the relay side to the client, and verifying that both shut down
when padding was up. (The tests previously erroneously tested only the client
side of intro circs, which actually were supposed to be doing nothing).
This just moves the state transition directives into the proper client/relay
side functions. It also allows us to remove some dead-code from the client
side (since the client doesn't send padding).
- Add some more useful logs for future debugging.
- Stop usage of circpad_state_to_string(). It's innacurate.
- Reduce severity and fix up log domain of some logging messages.
To ease debugging of miscount issues, attach vanguards with --loglevel DEBUG
and obtain control port logs (or use any other control port CIRC and
CIRC_MINOR event logging mechanism).
If circuit padding wants to keep a circuit open and pathbias used to ignore
it, pathbias should continue to ignore it.
This may catch other purpose-change related miscounts (such as timeout
measurement, cannibalization, onion service circuit transitions, and
vanguards).
When a circuit is marked for close, check to see if any of our padding
machines want to take ownership of it and continue padding until the machine
hits the END state.
For safety, we also ensure that machines that do not terminate are still
closed as follows: Because padding machine timers are UINT32_MAX in size, if
some sort of network event doesn't happen on a padding-only circuit within
that time, we can conclude it is deadlocked and allow
circuit_expire_old_circuits_clientside() to close it.
If too much network activity happens, then per-machine padding limits can be
used to cease padding, which will cause network cell events to cease, on the
circuit, which will cause circpad to abandon the circuit as per the above time
limit.
Because github PRs choose the most recent origin/master at the time of the PR
(and for any fixups pushed to a PR later to send to CI), there are tons of
conflicts and unexpected practracker issues.
This means CI can suddenly fail after fixups to a branch that pass locally.
Then CI fails and we have to close and re-open the PR.
We need to check here because otherwise we can try to schedule padding with no
tokens left upon the receipt of a padding event when our bins just became
empty.
Our other tests tested state lengths against padding packets, and token counts
against non-padding packets. This test checks state lengths against
non-padding packets (and also padding packets too), and checks token counts
against padding packets (and also non-padding packets too).
The next three commits are needed to make this test pass (it found 3 bugs).
Yay?
