Also, try to resolve some doxygen issues. First, define a magic
"This is doxygen!" macro so that we take the correct branch in
various #if/#else/#endifs in order to get the right documentation.
Second, add in a few grouping @{ and @} entries in order to get some
variables and fields to get grouped together.
Somewhere along the line, doxygen and tor changed their behavior a
little. The script is still a dreadful kludge, but now at least it
sorta works again.
This code shouldn't have any effect in 0.2.3, since we already accept
(and handle) data received while we are expecting a renegotiation.
(That's because the 0.2.3.x handshake _does_ have data there instead of
the renegotiation.)
I'm leaving it in anyway, since if it breaks anything, we'll want it
broken in master too so we can find out about it. I added an XXX023
comment so that we can come back later and fix that.
This fixes a DoS issue where a client could send so much data in 5
minutes that they exhausted the server's RAM. Fix for bug 5934 and
6007. Bugfix on 0.2.0.20-rc, which enabled the v2 handshake.
This fixes a warning in efb8a09f, where Debain Lenny's GCC doesn't get
that
for (i=0; i<3; ++i) {
const char *p;
switch(i) {
case 0:
p="X"; break;
case 1:
p="Y"; break;
case 2:
p="Z"; break;
}
printf("%s\n", p);
}
will never try to print an uninitialezed value.
Found by buildbots. Bug in no released versions of Tor.
It appears that when OpenSSL negotiates a 1.1 or 1.2 connection, and it
decides to renegotiate, the client will send a record with version "1.0"
rather than with the current TLS version. This would cause the
connection to fail whenever both sides had OpenSSL 1.0.1, and the v2 Tor
handshake was in use.
As a workaround, disable TLS 1.1 and TLS 1.2. When a later version of
OpenSSL is released, we can make this conditional on running a fixed
version of OpenSSL.
Alternatively, we could disable TLS 1.1 and TLS 1.2 only on the client
side. But doing it this way for now means that we not only fix TLS with
patched clients; we also fix TLS when the server has this patch and the
client does not. That could be important to keep the network running
well.
Fixes bug 6033.
This solves bug 5283, where client traffic could get sent over the
same circuit as an anonymized connection to a directory, even if
that circuit used an exit node unsuitable for clients. By marking
the directory connection as needs_internal, we ensure that the
(non-internal!) client-traffic connection won't be sent over the
same circuit.
Conflicts:
src/test/test_util.c
Merge the unit tests; I added some when I did this branch against
0.2.2, and then the test format changed and master added more tests.
Conflicts:
src/common/compat.h
Conflict was between replacement of MS_WINDOWS with _WIN32 in
master, and with removal of file_handle from tor_mmap_t struct in
close_file_mapping branch (for bug 5951 fix).
It turns out that if you set the third argument of
__attribute__(format) to 0, GCC and Clang will check the format
argument without expecting to find variadic arguments. This is the
correct behavior for vsnprintf, vasprintf, and vscanf.
I'm hoping this will fix bug 5969 (a clang warning) by telling clang that
the format argument to tor_vasprintf is indeed a format string.
On Windows, getsockname() on a nonblocking apparently won't work
until the connection is done connecting. On XP, it seems to fail by
reporting success and declaring that your address is INADDR_ANY. On the
Win8 preview, though, it fails more loudly and says WSAEINVAL.
Fix for bug 5374; bugfix on 0.1.1.14-alpha.
The parent of "/foo" is "/"; and "/" is its own parent.
This would cause Tor to fail if you tried to have a PF_UNIX control
socket in the root directory. That would be a stupid thing to do
for other reasons, but there's no reason to fail like _this_.
Bug found by Esteban Manchado Velázquez. Fix for bug 5089; bugfix on
Tor 0.2.2.26-beta. Unit test included.
Roger explains at
http://archives.seul.org/tor/talk/Nov-2011/msg00209.html :
"If you list your bridge as part of your family in the relay
descriptor, then everybody can learn your bridge fingerprint, and
they can look up your bridge's descriptor (and thus location) at
the bridge directory authority."
Now, we can't stop relays from listing bridges, but we can warn when
we notice a bridge listing anybody, which might help some.
This fixes bug 4657; it's a fix on 0.2.0.3-alpha, where bridges were
first introduced.
