Unused variable warnings were still generated under some versions of OpenSSL.
Instead, make sure all variables are used under all versions.
Fix on 496df21c89, not in any released version of tor.
An earlier version of these tests was broken; now they're a nicer,
more robust, more black-box set of tests. The key is to have each
test check a handshake message that is wrong in _one_ way.
If the OpenSSL team accepts my patch to add an
SSL_get_client_ciphers function, this patch will make Tor use it
when available, thereby working better with openssl 1.1.
We previously used this function instead of SSL_set_cipher_list() to
set up a stack of client SSL_CIPHERs for these reasons:
A) In order to force a particular order of the results.
B) In order to be able to include dummy entries for ciphers that
this build of openssl did not support, so we could impersonate
Firefox harder.
But we no longer do B, since we merged proposal 198 and stopped
lying about what ciphers we know.
And A was actually pointless, since I had misread the implementation
of SSL_set_cipher_list(). It _does_ do some internal sorting, but
that is pre-sorting on the master list of ciphers, not sorting on
the user's preferred order.
As OpenSSL >= 1.0.0 is now required, ECDHE is now mandatory. The group
has to be validated at runtime, because of RedHat lawyers (P224 support
is entirely missing in the OpenSSL RPM, but P256 is present and is the
default).
Resolves ticket #16140.
The key here is to never touch ssl->cipher_list directly, but only
via SSL_get_ciphers(). But it's not so simple.
See, if there is no specialized cipher_list on the SSL object,
SSL_get_ciphers returns the cipher_list on the SSL_CTX. But we sure
don't want to modify that one! So we need to use
SSL_set_cipher_list first to make sure that we really have a cipher
list on the SSL object.
This field was only needed to work with the now-long-gone (I hope,
except for some horrible apples) openssl 0.9.8l; if your headers say
you have openssl 1.1, you won't even need it.
Incidently, this fixes a bug where the maximum value was never used when
only using crypto_rand_int(). For instance this example below in
rendservice.c never gets to INTRO_POINT_LIFETIME_MAX_SECONDS.
int intro_point_lifetime_seconds =
INTRO_POINT_LIFETIME_MIN_SECONDS +
crypto_rand_int(INTRO_POINT_LIFETIME_MAX_SECONDS -
INTRO_POINT_LIFETIME_MIN_SECONDS);
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@ev0ke.net>
apparantly, "pragma GCC diagnostic push/pop" don't exist with older versions.
Fixes bug in 740e592790f570c446cbb5e6d4a77f842f75; bug not in any
released Tor.