When sending the INTRODUCE1 cell, we acquire the needed data for the cell but
if the RP node_t has invalid data, we'll fail the send and completely kill the
SOCKS connection.
Instead, close the rendezvous circuit and return a transient error meaning
that Tor can recover by selecting a new rendezvous point. We'll also do the
same when we are unable to encode the INTRODUCE1 cell for which at that point,
we'll simply take another shot at a new rendezvous point.
Fixes#27774
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
When we close a socket via tor_tls_free(), we previously had no way
for our socket accounting logic to learn about it. This meant that
the socket accounting code would think we had run out of sockets,
and freak out.
Fixes bug 27795; bugfix on 0.3.5.1-alpha.
Client side, when a descriptor is finally fetched and stored in the cache, we
then go over all pending SOCKS request for that descriptor. If it turns out
that the intro points are unusable, we close the first SOCKS request but not
the others for the same .onion.
This commit makes it that we'll close all SOCKS requests so we don't let
hanging the other ones.
It also fixes another bug which is having a SOCKS connection in RENDDESC_WAIT
state but with a descriptor in the cache. At some point, tor will expire the
intro failure cache which will make that descriptor usable again. When
retrying all SOCKS connection (retry_all_socks_conn_waiting_for_desc()), we
won't end up in the code path where we have already the descriptor for a
pending request causing a BUG().
Bottom line is that we should never have pending requests (waiting for a
descriptor) with that descriptor in the cache (even if unusable).
Fixees #27410.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
It is not enough to look at protover for v3 rendezvous support but also we
need to make sure that the curve25519 onion key is present or in other words
that the descriptor has been fetched and does contain it.
Fixes#27797.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Since the default cache directory is the same as the default data
directory, we don't want the default CacheDirectoryGroupReadable
value (0) to override an explicitly set "DataDirectoryGroupReadable
1".
To fix this, I'm making CacheDirectoryGroupReadable into an
autobool, and having the default (auto) value mean "Use the value of
DataDirectoryGroupReadable if the directories are the same, and 0
otherwise."
Fixes bug 26913; bugfix on 0.3.3.1-alpha when the CacheDirectory
option was introduced.
