Replace the 157 fallbacks originally introduced in Tor 0.3.5.6-rc
in December 2018 (of which ~122 were still functional), with a
list of 148 fallbacks (70 new, 78 existing, 79 removed) generated
in June 2019.
Closes ticket 28795.
Note that we created extra lists from DE and US, but they didn't add
any more fallbacks when we tried to merge them.
Update the fallback directory mirrors by merging the current list with:
fallback_dirs_2019-06-28-08-58-39_AU_f0437a39ddbc8459.inc
Part of 28795, see that ticket for logs.
Update the fallback directory mirrors by replacing the old list with:
fallback_dirs_2019-06-25-11-49-10_AU_a37adb956fbb5cd2.inc
Part of 28795, see that ticket for logs.
When we consider all circuits in "waiting for guard" state to be promoted to
an "open" state, we were considering all circuits, even the one marked for
close.
This ultiamtely triggers a "circuit_has_opened()" called on the circuit that
is marked for close which then leads to possible undesirable behaviors within
a subsystem.
For instance, the HS subsystem would be unable to find the authentication key
of the introduction point circuit leading to a BUG() warning and a duplicate
mark for close on the circuit.
This commit also adds a unit test to make sure we never select marked for
close circuits when upgrading its guard state from waiting for guard to open.
Fixes#30871
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Previously we had "make check" launched whenever DISTCHECK was
false. Now we'd like to turn it off in a few other circumstances,
like running chutney. Maybe stem too?
Skip test_rebind when the TOR_SKIP_TEST_REBIND environmental variable
is set.
Skip test_rebind on macOS in Travis builds, because it is unreliable
on macOS on Travis.
Fixes bug 30713; bugfix on 0.3.5.1-alpha.
Leave the other rend and hs_ident data around until circuit free, since code
may still try to inspect it after marking the circuit for close. The
circuitmap is the important thing to clean up, since repurposed
intropoints must be removed from this map to ensure validity.
When this function was implemented, it counted all the entry guards
in the bridge set. But this included previously configured bridges,
as well as currently configured ones! Instead, only count the
_filtered_ bridges (ones that are configured and possibly reachable)
as maybe usable.
Fixes bug 29875; bugfix on 0.3.0.1-alpha.
Previously, we were looking at our global settings to see what kind
of proxy we had. But doing this would sometimes give us the wrong
results when we had ClientTransportPlugin configured but we weren't
using it for a particular connection. In several places in the
code, we had added checks to see if we were _really_ using a PT or
whether we were using a socks proxy, but we had forgotten to do so
in at least once case. Instead, since every time we call this
function we are asking about a single connection, it is probably
best just to make this function connection-specific.
Fixes bug 29670; bugfix on 0.2.6.2-alpha.
If tor is compiled on a system with neither vasprintf nor _vscprintf,
the fallback implementation exposes a logic flaw which prevents
proper usage of strings longer than 127 characters:
* tor_vsnprintf returns -1 if supplied buffer is not large enough,
but tor_vasprintf uses this function to retrieve required length
* the result of tor_vsnprintf is not properly checked for negative
return values
Both aspects together could in theory lead to exposure of uninitialized
stack memory in the resulting string. This requires an invalid format
string or data that exceeds integer limitations.
Fortunately tor is not even able to run with this implementation because
it runs into asserts early on during startup. Also the unit tests fail
during a "make check" run.
Signed-off-by: Tobias Stoeckmann <tobias@stoeckmann.org>
[backported to 0.2.9 by nickm]
We want to support parsing a cell with unknown status code so we are forward
compatible.
Part of #30454
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Like the previous commit about the INTRODUCE_ACK status code, change all auth
key type to use the one defined in the trunnel file.
Standardize the use of these auth type to a common ABI.
Part of #30454
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This enum was the exact same as hs_intro_ack_status_t that was removed at the
previous commit. It was used client side when parsing the INTRODUCE_ACK cell.
Now, the entire code dealing with the INTRODUCE_ACK cell (both sending and
receiving) have been modified to all use the same ABI defined in the trunnel
introduce1 file.
Finally, the client will default to the normal behavior when receiving an
unknown NACK status code which is to note down that we've failed and re-extend
to the next intro point. This way, unknown status code won't trigger a
different behavior client side.
Part of #30454.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Remove the hs_intro_ack_status_t enum and move the value into trunnel. Only
use these values from now on in the intro point code.
Interestingly enough, the client side also re-define these values in hs_cell.h
with the hs_cell_introd_ack_status_t enum. Next commit will fix that and force
to use the trunnel ABI.
Part of #30454
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Previously we purged it in 1-hour increments -- but one-hour is the
maximum TTL for the cache! Now we do it in 25%-TTL increments.
Fixes bug 29617; bugfix on 0.3.5.1-alpha.
Fortunately, in 0.3.5.1-alpha we improved logging for various
failure cases involved with onion service client auth.
Unfortunately, for this one, we freed the file right before logging
its name.
Fortunately, tor_free() sets its pointer to NULL, so we didn't have
a use-after-free bug.
Unfortunately, passing NULL to %s is not defined.
Fortunately, GCC 9.1.1 caught the issue!
Unfortunately, nobody has actually tried building Tor with GCC 9.1.1
before. Or if they had, they didn't report the warning.
Fixes bug 30475; bugfix on 0.3.5.1-alpha.
The INTRODUCE1 trunnel definition file doesn't support that value so it can
not be used else it leads to an assert on the intro point side if ever tried.
Fortunately, it was impossible to reach that code path.
Part of #30454
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
