We previously used tor_fragile_assert() to declare that this case
could not happen: VERSIONS cells are always supposed to be
variable-sized, right?
This is incorrect, though. On a v1 link protocol connection, all
cells are fixed-sized. There aren't supposed to be any VERSIONS
cells with this version of the protocol, but apparently, somebody
was messing up. (The v1 link protocol is obsolete, so probably the
implementer responsible didn't mean to be using it.)
Fixes bug 31107. Bugfix on 0.2.4.4-alpha, when we introduced a
tor_fragile_assert() for this case.
There seems to be some unreliability issue with this test on
appveyor.
Addresses ticket 31757; This isn't a final fix for this issue, but
it should make CI pass.
This script takes a set of example torrcs and command-lines from
src/test/conf_examples. If a success is expected, it runs "tor
--dump-config" and compares the result with the one we expect. If a
failure is expected, it runs "tor --verify-config" and greps for the
error we expect.
GCC complains that we are using too many variables here, probably
because of the sheer number of locals used for our tinytest macros.
Eventually we should fix that (see 30968), but this commit just
makes the "note" go away by splitting the test function into two.
Coccinelle doesn't understand it when we use "==" and "!=" and so on as
arguments to macros. To solve this, we prefer OP_EQ, OP_NE, and so
on.
This commit is automatically generated by running
./scripts/coccinelle/test_operator_cleanup over all of the source
code in src.
Note that this header file behaves a bit strangely. It is used by
coccinelle just for the purpose of knowing how to parse
difficult-to-parse stuff. It doesn't need to produce good C -- just
grammatical C.
spatch can let us know whether a file has parsed "perfectly" or
not. The more perfect it parses, the likelier any semantic patches
are to apply. I've used this script to identify problem areas in
our code.
It's a bit tricky to remember the right incantation to get the
proper include paths and incantations for coccinelle, but without
it, coccinelle is less effective at parsing our C.
