This patch fixes a crash bug (assertion failure) in the PT subsystem
that could get triggered if the user cancels bootstrap via the UI in
TorBrowser. This would cause Tor to call `managed_proxy_destroy()` which
called `process_free()` after it had called `process_terminate()`. This
leads to a crash when the various process callbacks returns with data
after the `process_t` have been freed using `process_free()`.
We solve this issue by ensuring that everywhere we call
`process_terminate()` we make sure to detach the `managed_proxy_t` from
the `process_t` (by calling `process_set_data(process, NULL)`) and avoid
calling `process_free()` at all in the transports code. Instead we just
call `process_terminate()` and let the process exit callback in
`managed_proxy_exit_callback()` handle the `process_free()` call by
returning true to the process subsystem.
See: https://bugs.torproject.org/29562
Fixes bug 29530, where the LOG_ERR messages were occurring when
we had no configured network, and so we were failing the unit tests
because of the recently-merged #28668.
Commit message edited by teor:
We backported 28668 and released it in 0.3.5.8.
This commit backports 29530 to 0.3.5.
Fixes bug 29530 in Tor 0.3.5.8.
When IPv4Only (IPv6Only) was used but the address could not be
interpreted as a IPv4 (IPv6) address, the error message referred
to the wrong IP version.
This also fixes up the error-checking logic so it's more precise
about what's being checked.
Fixes bug 13221; bugfix on 0.2.3.9-alpha
Signed-off-by: Kris Katterjohn <katterjohn@gmail.com>
KIST works by computing how much should be allowed to write to the kernel for
a given socket, and then it writes that amount to the outbuf.
The problem is that it could be possible that the outbuf already has lots of
data in it from a previous scheduling round (because the kernel is full/busy
and Tor was not able to flush the outbuf yet). KIST ignores that the outbuf
has been filling (is above its "highwater") and writes more anyway. The end
result is that the outbuf length would exceed INT_MAX, hence causing an
assertion error and a corresponding "Bug()" message to get printed to the
logs.
This commit makes it for KIST to take into account the outbuf length when
computing the available space.
Bug found and patch by Rob Jansen.
Closes#29168. TROVE-2019-001.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Fixes bug 29530, where the LOG_ERR messages were occurring when
we had no configured network, and so we were failing the unit tests
because of the recently-merged #28668.
Bug not in any released Tor.
This test fails in some environments; since the code isn't used in
0.4.0, let's disable it for now.
Band-aid solution for #29534; bug not in any released Tor.
malloc_options needs to be declared extern (and declaring it extern
means we need to initialize it separately)
Fixes bug 29145; bugfix on 0.2.9.3-alpha
Signed-off-by: Kris Katterjohn <katterjohn@gmail.com>
This module is currently implemented to use the same technique as
libottery (later used by the bsds' arc4random replacement), using
AES-CTR-256 as its underlying stream cipher. It's backtracking-
resistant immediately after each call, and prediction-resistant
after a while.
Here's how it works:
We generate psuedorandom bytes using AES-CTR-256. We generate BUFLEN bytes
at a time. When we do this, we keep the first SEED_LEN bytes as the key
and the IV for our next invocation of AES_CTR, and yield the remaining
BUFLEN - SEED_LEN bytes to the user as they invoke the PRNG. As we yield
bytes to the user, we clear them from the buffer.
Every RESEED_AFTER times we refill the buffer, we mix in an additional
SEED_LEN bytes from our strong PRNG into the seed.
If the user ever asks for a huge number of bytes at once, we pull SEED_LEN
bytes from the PRNG and use them with our stream cipher to fill the user's
request.
Because the test is adding entries to the "rend_cache" directly, the
rend_cache_increment_allocation() was never called which made the
rend_cache_clean() call trigger that underflow warning:
rend_cache/clean: [forking] Nov 29 09:55:04.024 [warn] rend_cache_decrement_allocation(): Bug: Underflow in rend_cache_decrement_allocation (on Tor 0.4.0.0-alpha-dev 2240fe63feb9a8cf)
The test is still good and valid.
Fixes#28660
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Using an anonymous mmap() is a good way to get pages that we can set
kernel-level flags on, like minherit() or madvise() or mlock().
We're going to use that so that we can make uninheritable locked
pages to store PRNG data.
Because the test is adding entries to the "rend_cache" directly, the
rend_cache_increment_allocation() was never called which made the
rend_cache_clean() call trigger that underflow warning:
rend_cache/clean: [forking] Nov 29 09:55:04.024 [warn] rend_cache_decrement_allocation(): Bug: Underflow in rend_cache_decrement_allocation (on Tor 0.4.0.0-alpha-dev 2240fe63feb9a8cf)
The test is still good and valid.
Fixes#28660
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
The code checked for sysctl being available and HW_PHYSMEM being
defined, but HW_USERMEM was actually being used with sysctl instead
of HW_PHYSMEM.
The case for OpenBSD, etc. use HW_PHYSMEM64 (which is obviously a
64-bit variant of HW_PHYSMEM) and the case for OSX uses HW_MEMSIZE
(which appears to be a 64-bit variant of HW_PHYSMEM).
Signed-off-by: Kris Katterjohn <katterjohn@gmail.com>
We log these messages at INFO level, except when we are reading a
private key from a file, in which case we log at WARN.
This fixes a regression from when we re-wrote our PEM code to be
generic between nss and openssl.
Fixes bug 29042, bugfix on 0.3.5.1-alpha.
When cleaning up after an error in process_unix_exec, the stdin
pipe was being double closed instead of closing both the stdin
and stdout pipes. This occurred in two places.
Signed-off-by: Kris Katterjohn <katterjohn@gmail.com>
NOTE: This commit breaks the build, because there was a mistake in an
earlier change of exactly the sort that this is meant to detect! I'm
leaving it broken for illustration.
Test exactly what the geometric sampler returns, because that's what
the downstream callers of it are going to use.
While here, also assert that the geometric sampler returns a positive
integer. (Our geometric distribution is the one suported on {1, 2,
3, ...} that returns the number of trials before the first success,
not the one supported on {0, 1, 2, ...} that returns the number of
failures before the first success.)
In file included from ./src/core/or/or_circuit_st.h:12:0,
from src/core/or/circuitlist.c:112:
./src/core/or/circuit_st.h:15:39: error: redefinition of typedef ‘circpad_machine_spec_t’
./src/core/or/circuitpadding.h:572:3: note: previous declaration of ‘circpad_machine_spec_t’ was here
./src/core/or/circuit_st.h:16:40: error: redefinition of typedef ‘circpad_machine_state_t’
./src/core/or/circuitpadding.h:517:3: note: previous declaration of ‘circpad_machine_state_t’ was here
In file included from src/core/or/connection_edge.c:70:0:
./src/core/or/circuitpadding.h:16:26: error: redefinition of typedef ‘circuit_t’
./src/core/or/or.h:930:26: note: previous declaration of ‘circuit_t’ was here
./src/core/or/circuitpadding.h:17:33: error: redefinition of typedef ‘origin_circuit_t’
./src/core/or/or.h:931:33: note: previous declaration of ‘origin_circuit_t’ was here
./src/core/or/circuitpadding.h:18:23: error: redefinition of typedef ‘cell_t’
./src/core/or/or.h:628:23: note: previous declaration of ‘cell_t’ was here
typedef doesn't work for forward declarations, but plain struct
without a typedef wrapper does (and unlike the _t type aliases makes
it clearer for everyone whether you're talking about the struct or
the pointer).
Stop logging "Tried to establish rendezvous on non-OR circuit..." as
a warning. Instead, log it as a protocol warning, because there is
nothing that relay operators can do to fix it.
Fixes bug 29029; bugfix on 0.2.5.7-rc.
