In d1874b4339, we adjusted this check so that we insist on
using routerinfos for bridges. That's almost correct... but if we
have a bridge that is also a regular relay, then we should use
insist on its routerinfo when connecting to it as a bridge
(directly), and be willing to use its microdescriptor when
connecting to it elsewhere in our circuits.
This bug is a likely cause of some (all?) of the (exit_ei == NULL)
failures we've been seeing.
Fixes bug 25691; bugfix on 0.3.3.4-alpha
This update is needed to make it consistent with the behavior of
node_awaiting_ipv6(), which doesn't believe in the addresses from
routerinfos unless it actually plans to use those routerinfos.
Fixes bug 25213; bugfix on b66b62fb75 in 0.3.3.1-alpha,
which tightened up the definition of node_awaiting_ipv6().
Additionally, this change extracts the functions that created and
freed these elements.
These structures had common "forward&reverse stream&digest"
elements, but they were initialized and freed through cpath objects,
and different parts of the code depended on them. Now all that code
is extacted, and kept in relay_crypto.c
This removes the code that tracks the extend attemps a client makes. We don't
use it and it was only used to provide statistics on a SIGUSR1 from the
rephist dump stats function.
Part of #25163
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
In order to make the OR and dir checking functions in router.c less confusing
we renamed some functions and splitted consider_testing_reachability() into
router_should_check_reachability() and router_do_reachability_checks(). Also we
improved the documentation.
Fixes#18918.
Signed-off-by: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <ffmancera@riseup.net>
The is_first_hop field should have been called used_create_fast,
but everywhere that we wanted to check it, we should have been
checking channel_is_client() instead.
Before, this function meant "can we connect to this node and
authenticate it using its ed25519 key?" Now it can additionally
mean, "when somebody else connects to this node, do we expect that
they can authenticate using the node's ed25519 key"?
This change lets us future-proof our link authentication a bit.
Closes ticket 20895. No backport needed, since ed25519 link
authentication support has not been in any LTS release yet, and
existing releases with it should be obsolete before any releases
without support for linkauth=3 are released.
Version 3 hidden service needs rendezvous point that have the protocol version
HSRend >= 2 else the rendezvous cells are rejected.
Fixes#23361
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
- Move some crypto structures so that they are visible by tests.
- Introduce a func to count number of hops in cpath which will be used
by the tests.
- Mark a function as mockable.
circuit_init_cpath_crypto() is responsible for creating the cpath of legacy
SHA1/AES128 circuits currently. We want to use it for prop224 circuits, so we
refactor it to create circuits with SHA3-256 and AES256 as well.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
