This is the loudest of our LOG_PROTOCOL_WARN messages, it can occur
naturally, and there doesn't seem to be a great response to it.
Partial fix for 40400; bugfix on 0.1.1.13-alpha.
This one happens every time we get a failure from
circuit_receive_relay_cell -- but for all the relevant failing cases
in that function, we already log in that function.
This resolves one case of #40400. Two cases remain.
Series 0.4.2.x, 0.4.3.x and 0.4.4.x will all be rejected at the
authority level at this commit.
Futhermore, the 0.4.5.x alphas and rc will also be rejected.
Closes#40480
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
The connection_ap_attach_pending() function processes all pending
streams in the pending_entry_connections list. It first copy the pointer
and then allocates a brand new empty list.
It then iterates over that copy pointer to try to attach entry
connections onto any fitting circuits using
connection_ap_handshake_attach_circuit().
That very function, for onion service, can lead to flagging _all_
streams of the same onion service to be put in state RENDDESC_WAIT from
CIRCUIT_WAIT. By doing so, it also tries to remove them from the
pending_entry_connections but at that point it is already empty.
Problem is that the we are iterating over the previous
pending_entry_connections which contains the streams that have just
changed state and are no longer in CIRCUIT_WAIT.
This lead to this bug warning occuring a lot on busy services:
May 01 08:55:43.000 [warn] connection_ap_attach_pending(): Bug:
0x55d8764ae550 is no longer in circuit_wait. Its current state is
waiting for rendezvous desc. Why is it on pending_entry_connections?
(on Tor 0.4.4.0-alpha-dev )
This fix is minimal and basically allow a state to be not CIRCUIT_WAIT
and move on to the next one without logging a warning. Because the
pending_entry_connections is emptied before processing, there is no
chance for a streams to be stuck there forever thus it is OK to ignore
streams not in the right state.
Fixes#34083
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
When building with --enable-fragile-hardening, add or relax Linux
seccomp rules to allow AddressSanitizer to execute normally if the
process terminates with the sandbox active.
Further resolves issue 11477.
When a directory request fails, we flag the relay as non Running so we
don't use it anymore.
This can be problematic with onion services because there are cases
where a tor instance could have a lot of services, ephemeral ones, and
keeps failing to upload descriptors, let say due to a bad network, and
thus flag a lot of nodes as non Running which then in turn can not be
used for circuit building.
This commit makes it that we never flag nodes as non Running on a onion
service directory request (upload or fetch) failure as to keep the
hashring intact and not affect other parts of tor.
Fortunately, the onion service hashring is _not_ selected by looking at
the Running flag but since we do a 3-hop circuit to the HSDir, other
services on the same instance can influence each other by removing nodes
from the consensus for path selection.
This was made apparent with a small network that ran out of nodes to
used due to rapid succession of onion services uploading and failing.
See #40434 for details.
Fixes#40434
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Fixes bug 40078.
As reported by hdevalence our batch verification logic can cause an assert
crash.
The assert happens because when the batch verification of ed25519-donna fails,
the code in `ed25519_checksig_batch()` falls back to doing a single
verification for each signature.
The crash occurs because batch verification failed, but then all signatures
individually verified just fine.
That's because batch verification and single verification use a different
equation which means that there are sigs that can pass single verification
but fail batch verification.
Fixing this would require modding ed25519-donna which is not in scope for
this ticket, and will be soon deprecated in favor of arti and
ed25519-dalek, so my branch instead removes batch verification.
Continue having a tor_gmtime_impl() unit test so that we can detect
any problems in our replacement function; add a new test function to
make sure that gmtime<->timegm are a round-trip on now-ish times.
This is a fix for bug #40383, wherein we ran into trouble because
tor_timegm() does not believe that time_t should include a count of
leap seconds, but FreeBSD's gmtime believes that it should. This
disagreement meant that for a certain amount of time each day,
instead of calculating the most recent midnight, our voting-schedule
functions would calculate the second-most-recent midnight, and lead
to an assertion failure.
I am calling this a bugfix on 0.2.0.3-alpha when we first started
calculating our voting schedule in this way.
This patch enables the deterministic RNG for address set tests,
including the tests which uses address set indirectly via the nodelist
API.
This should prevent random test failures in the highly unlikely case of
a false positive which was seen in tor#40419.
See: tpo/core/tor#40419.
This issue was reported by Jann Horn part of Google's Project Zero.
Jann's one-sentence summary: entry/middle relays can spoof RELAY_END cells on
half-closed streams, which can lead to stream confusion between OP and
exit.
Fixes#40389
Previously, we would detect errors from a missing RNG
implementation, but not failures from the RNG code itself.
Fortunately, it appears those failures do not happen in practice
when Tor is using OpenSSL's default RNG implementation. Fixes bug
40390; bugfix on 0.2.8.1-alpha. This issue is also tracked as
TROVE-2021-004. Reported by Jann Horn at Google's Project Zero.
Cached_dir_t is a somewhat "legacy" kind of storage when used for
consensus documents, and it appears that there are cases when
changing our settings causes us to stop updating those entries.
This can cause trouble, as @arma found out in #40375, where he
changed his settings around, and consensus diff application got
messed up: consensus diffs were being _requested_ based on the
latest consensus, but were being (incorrectly) applied to a
consensus that was no longer the latest one.
This patch is a minimal fix for backporting purposes: it has Tor do
the same search when applying consensus diffs as we use to request
them. This should be sufficient for correct behavior.
There's a similar case in GETINFO handling; I've fixed that too.
Fixes#40375; bugfix on 0.3.1.1-alpha.
When seccomp sandbox is active, SAVECONF failed because it was not
able to save the backup files for torrc. This commit simplifies
the implementation of SAVECONF and sandbox by making it keep only
one backup of the configuration file.
The connection type for the listener part was missing from the "is
connection a listener" function.
This lead to our periodic event that retries our listeners to keep
trying to bind() again on an already opened MetricsPort.
Closes#40370
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This change permits the newfstatat() system call, and fixes issues
40382 (and 40381).
This isn't a free change. From the commit:
// Libc 2.33 uses this syscall to implement both fstat() and stat().
//
// The trouble is that to implement fstat(fd, &st), it calls:
// newfstatat(fs, "", &st, AT_EMPTY_PATH)
// We can't detect this usage in particular, because "" is a pointer
// we don't control. And we can't just look for AT_EMPTY_PATH, since
// AT_EMPTY_PATH only has effect when the path string is empty.
//
// So our only solution seems to be allowing all fstatat calls, which
// means that an attacker can stat() anything on the filesystem. That's
// not a great solution, but I can't find a better one.
As of GCC 11.1.1, the compiler warns us about code like this:
if (a)
b;
c;
and that's a good thing: we wouldn't want to "goto fail". But we
had an instance if this in circuituse.c, which was making our
compilation sad.
Fixes bug 40380; bugfix on 0.3.0.1-alpha.
Turns out that passing client authorization keys to ADD_ONION for v3 was
not working because we were not setting the "is_client_auth_enabled"
flag to true once the clients were configured. This lead to the
descriptor being encoded without the clients.
This patch removes that flag and instead adds an inline function that
can be used to check if a given service has client authorization
enabled.
This will be much less error prone of needing to keep in sync the client
list and a flag instead.
Fixes#40378
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This function has been a no-op since Libevent 2.0.4-alpha, when
libevent got an arc4random() implementation. Libevent has finally
removed it, which will break our compilation unless we stop calling
it. (This is currently breaking compilation in OSS-fuzz.)
Closes#40371.
This is related to ticket #40360 which found this problem when a Bridge entry
with a transport name (let say obfs4) is set without a fingerprint:
Bridge obfs4 <IP>:<PORT> cert=<...> iat-mode=0
(Notice, no fingerprint between PORT and "cert=")
Problem: commit 09c6d03246 added a check in
get_sampled_guard_for_bridge() that would return NULL if the selected bridge
did not have a valid transport name (that is the Bridge transport name that
corresponds to a ClientTransportPlugin).
Unfortuantely, this function is also used when selecting our eligible guards
which is done *before* the transport list is populated and so the added check
for the bridge<->transport name is querying an empty list of transports
resulting in always returning NULL.
For completion, the logic is: Pick eligible guards (use bridge(s) if need be)
then for those, initiate a connection to the pluggable transport proxy and
then populate the transport list once we've connected.
Back to get_sampled_guard_for_bridge(). As said earlier, it is used when
selecting our eligible guards in a way that prevents us from selecting
duplicates. In other words, if that function returns non-NULL, the selection
continues considering the bridge was sampled before. But if it returns NULL,
the relay is added to the eligible list.
This bug made it that our eligible guard list was populated with the *same*
bridge 3 times like so (remember no fingerprint):
[info] entry_guards_update_primary(): Primary entry guards have changed. New primary guard list is:
[info] entry_guards_update_primary(): 1/3: [bridge] ($0000000000000000000000000000000000000000)
[info] entry_guards_update_primary(): 2/3: [bridge] ($0000000000000000000000000000000000000000)
[info] entry_guards_update_primary(): 3/3: [bridge] ($0000000000000000000000000000000000000000)
When tor starts, it will find the bridge fingerprint by connecting to it and
will then update the primary guard list by calling
entry_guard_learned_bridge_identity() which then goes and update only 1 single
entry resulting in this list:
[debug] sampled_guards_update_consensus_presence(): Sampled guard [bridge] ($<FINGERPRINT>) is still listed.
[debug] sampled_guards_update_consensus_presence(): Sampled guard [bridge] ($0000000000000000000000000000000000000000) is still listed.
[debug] sampled_guards_update_consensus_presence(): Sampled guard [bridge] ($0000000000000000000000000000000000000000) is still listed.
And here lies the problem, now tor is stuck attempting to wait for a valid
descriptor for at least 2 guards where the second one is a bunch of zeroes and
thus tor will never fully bootstraps:
[info] I learned some more directory information, but not enough to build a
circuit: We're missing descriptors for 1/2 of our primary entry guards
(total microdescriptors: 6671/6703). That's ok. We will try to fetch missing
descriptors soon.
Now, why passing the fingerprint then works? This is because the list of
guards contains 3 times the same bridge but they all have a fingerprint and so
the descriptor can be found and tor can bootstraps.
The solution here is to entirely remove the transport name check in
get_sampled_guard_for_bridge() since the transport_list is empty at that
point. That way, the eligible guard list only gets 1 entry, the bridge, and
can then go on to bootstrap properly.
It is OK to do so since when launching a bridge descriptor fetch, we validate
that the bridge transport name is OK and thus avoid connecting to a bridge
without a ClientTransportPlugin. If we wanted to keep the check in place, we
would need to populate the transport_list much earlier and this would require
a much bigger refactoring.
Fixes#40360
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
When seccomp sandbox is active, SAVECONF failed because it was not
able to save the backup files for torrc. This commit simplifies
the implementation of SAVECONF and sandbox by making it keep only
one backup of the configuration file.
In versions <=2.69, according to the autoconf docs, AC_PROG_CC_C99
is needed with some compilers, if they require extra arguments to
build C99 programs. In versions >=2.70, AC_PROG_CC checks for these
compilers automatically, and so the AC_PROG_CC_C99 macro is
obsolete.
So, what can you do if you want your script to work right with both
autoconf versions? IIUC, neither including AC_PROG_CC_C99 macro nor
leaving it out will give you the right behavior with both versions.
It looks like you need to look at the autoconf version explicitly.
(Now, the autoconf manual implies that it's "against autoconf
philosophy" to look at the autoconf version rather than trying the
behavior to see if it works, but they don't actually tell you how to
detect recoverably at autoconf-time whether a macro is obsolete or
not, and I can't find a way to do that.)
So, is it safe to use m4_version_prereq, like I do here? It isn't
listed in the autoconf 2.63 manual (which is the oldest version we
support). But a mailing list message [1] (which added the
documentation back in 2008) implies that m4_version_prereq has been
there since "at least back to autoconf 2.59".
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-patches/2008-12/msg00025.html
So I think this will work.
I am basing this patch against Tor 0.3.5 since, if autoconf 2.70
becomes widespread before 0.3.5 is unsupported, we might need this
patch to continue 0.3.5 development. But I don't think we should
backport farther than 0.4.5 until/unless that actually happens.
This is part of a fix for #40355.
On Linux systems, glob automatically ignores the errors ENOENT and
ENOTDIR because they are expected during glob expansion. But BSD
systems do not ignore these, resulting in glob failing when globs
expand to invalid paths. This is fixed by adding a custom error
handler that ignores only these two errors and removing the
GLOB_ERR flag as it makes glob fail even if the error handler
ignores the error and is unnecessary as the error handler will
make glob fail on all other errors anyway.
Fortunately, our tor_free() is setting the variable to NULL after so we were
in a situation where NULL was always used instead of the transport name.
This first appeared in 894ff2dc84 and results in
basically no bridge with a transport being able to use DoS defenses.
Fixes#40345
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Clients now check whether their streams are attempting to re-enter
the Tor network (i.e. to send Tor traffic over Tor), and they close
them preemptively if they think exit relays will refuse them.
See bug 2667 for details. Resolves ticket 40271.
- Implement overload statistics structure.
- Implement function that keeps track of overload statistics.
- Implement function that writes overload statistics to descriptor.
- Unittest for the whole logic.
This option changes the time for which a bandwidth measurement period
must have been in progress before we include it when reporting our
observed bandwidth in our descriptors. Without this option, we only
consider a time period towards our maximum if it has been running
for a full day. Obviously, that's unacceptable for testing
networks, where we'd like to get results as soon as possible.
For non-testing networks, I've put a (somewhat arbitrary) 2-hour
minimum on the option, since there are traffic analysis concerns
with immediate reporting here.
Closes#40337.
We were looking for the first instance of "directory-signature "
when instead the correct behavior is to look for the first instance
of "directory-signature " at the start of a line.
Unfortunately, this can be exploited as to crash authorities while
they're voting.
Fixes#40316; bugfix on 0.2.2.4-alpha. This is TROVE-2021-002,
also tracked as CVE-2021-28090.
When reloading a service, we can re-register a service and thus end up again
in the metrics store initialization code path which is fine. No need to BUG()
anymore.
Fixes#40334
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Use find_str_at_start_of_line(), not strstr() here: we don't want
to match "MemTotal: " if it appears in the middle of a line.
Fixes#40315; bugfix on 0.2.5.4-alpha.
The directory_fetches_from_authorities() is used to know if a client or relay
should fetch data from an authority early in the boot process.
We had a condition in that function that made a relay trigger that fetch if it
didn't know its address (so we can learn it). However, when this is called,
the address discovery has not been done yet so it would always return true for
a relay.
Furthermore, it would always trigger a log notice that the IPv4 couldn't be
found which was inevitable because the address discovery process has not been
done yet (done when building our first descriptor).
It is also important to point out that starting in 0.4.5.1-alpha, asking an
authority for an address is done during address discovery time using a one-hop
circuit thus independent from the relay deciding to fetch or not documents
from an authority.
Small fix also is to reverse the "IPv(4|6)Only" flag in the notice so that if
we can't find IPv6 it would output to use IPv4Only.
Fixes#40300
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Fix a bug introduced in 94b56eaa75 which
overwrite the connection message line.
Furthermore, improve how we generate that line by using a smartlist and change
the format so it is clearer of what is being rejected/detected and, if
applicable, which option is disabled thus yielding no stats.
Closes#40308
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This is a new detection type which is that a relay can now control the rate of
client connections from a single address.
The mechanism is pretty simple, if the rate/burst is reached, the address is
marked for a period of time and any connection from that address is denied.
Closes#40253
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
When trying to find our address to publish, we would log notice if we couldn't
find it from the cache but then we would look at the suggested cache (which
contains the address from the authorities) in which we might actually have the
address.
Thus that log notice was misplaced. Move it down after the suggested address
cache lookup.
Closes#40300
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
It can be called with strings that should have been
length-delimited, but which in fact are not. This can cause a
CPU-DoS bug or, in a worse case, a crash.
Since this function isn't essential, the best solution for older
Tors is to just turn it off.
Fixes bug 40286; bugfix on 0.2.2.1-alpha when dump_desc() was
introduced.
Now that exit relays don't allow exit connections to directory authority
DirPorts, the follow-up step is to make directory authorities stop doing
DirPort reachability checks.
Fixes#40287
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Turns out, we forgot to add the METRICS connection type fo the finished
flushing handler.
Fixes#40295
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
We were just looking at the family which is not correct because it is possible
to have two explicit ORPort for the same family but different addresses. One
example is:
ORPort 127.0.0.1:9001 NoAdvertise
ORPort 1.2.3.4:9001 NoListen
Thus, this patch now ignores ports that have different addresses iff they are
both explicits. That is, if we have this example, also two different
addresses:
ORPort 9001
ORPort 127.0.0.1:9001 NoAdvertise
The first one is implicit and second one is explicit and thus we have to
consider them for removal which in this case would remove the "ORPort 9001" in
favor of the second port.
Fixes#40289
Signe-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
In other words, if PublishServerDescriptor is set to 0 and AssumeReachable to
1, then allow a relay to hold a RFC1918 address.
Reasons for this are documented in #40208Fixes#40208
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Handle the EOF situation for a metrics connection. Furthermore, if we failed
to fetch the data from the inbuf properly, mark the socket as closed because
the caller, connection_process_inbuf(), assumes that we did so on error.
Fixes#40257
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Previously we would warn in this case... but there's really no
justification for doing so, and it can only cause confusion.
Fixes bug #40281; bugfix on 0.4.0.1-alpha.
In two instances we must look at this flag:
1. When we build the descriptor so the IPv6 is NOT added to the descriptor in
case we judge that we need to omit the address but still publish.
2. When we are deciding if the descriptor is publishable. This flags tells us
that the IPv6 was not found reachable but we should still publish.
Fixes#40279
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Exit relays now reject exit attempts to known relay addresses + ORPort and
also to authorities on the ORPort and DirPort.
Closes#2667
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Exit relays now reject exit attempts to known relay addresses + ORPort and
also to authorities on the ORPort and DirPort.
Closes#2667
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
We would before do an address discovery and then a lookup in the cache if not
found which is now simplified by calling relay_find_addr_to_publish() directly
which does all those combined.
Furthermore, by doing so, we won't trigger an address discovery every minute
if we have no ORPort configured for the family.
Fixes#40254
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Let external bridge reachability testing tools discard cached
bridge descriptors when setting new bridges, so they can be sure
to get a clean reachability test.
Implements ticket 40209.
Generates the compile_commands.json file using the "bear" application so the
ccls server can be more efficient with our code base.
Closes#40227
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This validation was only done if DisableNetwork was off because we would use
the global list of transports/bridges and DisableNetwork would not populate
it.
This was a problem for any user using DisableNetwork which includes Tor
Browser and thus leading to the Bug() warning.
Without a more in depth refactoring, we can't do this validation without the
global list.
The previous commit makes it that any connection to a bridge without a
transport won't happen thus we keep the security feature of not connecting to
a bridge without its corresponding transport.
Related to #40106
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This patch limits the number of items in the consensus diff cache to 64
on the Windows platform. Hopefully, this will allow us to investigate a
smarter fix while avoiding the situation reported in tor#24857 where
Windows relay operators report Tor using 100% CPU.
See: tor#24857
This patch removes a call to `tor_assert_nonfatal()` if
`extend_info_from_node()` returns NULL. This is unnecessary as we
already handle the case where `info` is NULL in the next `if (!info) {
... }` block in the code.
See: tor#32666.
This reverts commit d07f17f676.
We don't want to consider an entire routable IPv6 network as sybil if more
than 2 relays happen to be on it. For path selection it is very important but
not for selecting relays in the consensus.
Fixes#40243
We can end up trying to find our address from an authority while we don't have
yet its descriptor.
In this case, don't BUG() and just come back later.
Closes#40231
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This one should work on GCC _and_ on Clang. The previous version
made Clang happier by not having unreachable "fallthrough"
statements, but made GCC sad because GCC didn't think that the
unconditional failures were really unconditional, and therefore
_wanted_ a FALLTHROUGH.
This patch adds a FALLTHROUGH_UNLESS_ALL_BUGS_ARE_FATAL macro that
seems to please both GCC and Clang in this case: ordinarily it is a
FALLTHROUGH, but when ALL_BUGS_ARE_FATAL is defined, it's an
abort().
Fixes bug 40241 again. Bugfix on earlier fix for 40241, which was
merged into maint-0.3.5 and forward, and released in 0.4.5.3-rc.
Some gcc versions do explode if the order of the linker flags are not correct.
One issue was statically building OpenSSL which would require that "-lssl
-lcrypto" be put _before_ the "-lpthread -ldl" flags.
I have not such problem with GCC 10 but does with GCC 9.
Closes#33624
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Our original code for parsing these parameters out of our list of
parameters pre-dated us having the
dirvote_get_intermediate_param_value() function... and it was buggy.
Specifically, it would reject any " ... K=V ..." value
where there were additional unconverted characters after the V, and
use the default value instead,
We haven't run into this yet because we've never voted for
bwweightscale to be anything besides the default 10000, or
maxunmeasuredbw to be anything besides the default 20.
This requires a new consensus method because it is a change in how
consensuses are computed.
Fixes bug 19011; bugfix on 0.2.2.10-alpha.
Some days before this commit, the network experienced a DDoS on the directory
authorities that prevented them to generate a consensus for more than 5 hours
straight.
That in turn entirely disabled onion service v3, client and service side, due
to the subsystem requiring a live consensus to function properly.
We know require a reasonably live consensus which means that the HSv3
subsystem will to its job for using the best consensus tor can find. If the
entire network is using an old consensus, than this should be alright.
If the service happens to use a live consensus while a client is not, it
should still work because the client will use the current SRV it sees which
might be the previous SRV for the service for which it still publish
descriptors for.
If the service is using an old one and somehow can't get a new one while
clients are on a new one, then reachability issues might arise. However, this
is a situation we already have at the moment since the service will simply not
work if it doesn't have a live consensus while a client has one.
Fixes#40237
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
We're getting "fallback annotation annotation in unreachable code"
warnings when we build with ALL_BUGS_ARE_FATAL. This patch fixes
that.
Fixes bug 40241. Bugfix on 0.3.5.4-alpha.
If we get an address suggestion from a directory authority and we have no
address configured or discovered, log it at notice level so the operator can
learn what address will be used by Tor.
Fixes#40201
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
It turns out that 9 years ago, we stopped appending data into stats file and
rather overwrite everytime we have new stats (see commit
a6a127c833)
The load_stats_file() function was still thinking that we could have the same
line many times in the file which turns out to be false since 9 years ago.
However, that did not cause problem until IPv6 connection stats came along
which introduced a new line in conn-stats: "ipv6-conn-bi-direct ...".
Before, that file contained a single line starting with the tag
"conn-bi-direct". That very tag appears also in the IPv6 tag (see above) so
the load_stats_file() function would consider that the IPv6 line as the last
tag to be appeneded to the file and fail to report the line above (for IPv4).
It would actually truncate the IPv6 line and report it (removing the "ipv6-"
part).
In other words, "conn-bi-direct" was not reported and instead
"ipv6-conn-bi-direct" was used without the "ipv6-" part.
This commit refactors the entire function so that now it looks for a
"timestamp tag" to validate and then if everything is fine, returns the entire
content of the file. The refactor simplifies the function, adds logging in
case of failures and modernize it in terms of coding standard.
Unit tests are also added that makes sure the loaded content matches the
entire file if timestamp validation passes.
Fixes#40226
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
When making sure we have a Bridge line with a ClientTransportPlugin, we
now check in the managed proxy list and so we can catch any missing
ClientTransportPlugin for a Bridge line.
Fixes#40106
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Generates the compile_commands.json file using the "bear" application so the
ccls server can be more efficient with our code base.
Closes#40227
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Previously, our code would send back an error if the socks5 request
parser said anything but DONE. But there are other non-error cases,
like TRUNCATED: we shouldn't send back errors for them.
This patch lowers the responsibility for setting the error message
into the parsing code, since the actual type of the error message
will depend on what problem was encountered.
Fixes bug 40190; bugfix on 0.3.5.1-alpha.
Previously, "--list-fingerprint --quiet" was an error. Now, the
handler for optional arguments to "--list-fingerprint" can tell that
"--quiet" is a flag, not an argument.
This only affects flags that take an _optional_ argument, so you can
still put your torrc file in a location starting with "-".
Closes#40223.
The "-static" compile flag was set globally which means that all autoconf test
were attempting to be built statically and lead to failures of detecting
OpenSSL libraries and others.
This commit adds this flag only to the "tor" binary build.
There is also a fix on where to find libevent.a since it is using libtool, it
is in .libs/.
At this commit, there are still warnings being emitted that informs the user
that the built binary must still be linked dynamically with glibc.
Fixes#40111
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
The time diffs were misleading and unpretty when a channel has not seen
a client, a cell or transmitted a cell.
This commit adds some prettier messages.
Fixes#40182
When sending the stream level SENDME, it is possible the cirucit was marked
for close or any other failures that can occur. These events can occur
naturally.
Fixes#40142
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
The function in charge of removing duplicate ORPorts from our configured ports
was skipping all non ORPorts port but only for the outer loop thus resulting
in comparing an ORPort with a non-ORPort which lead to problems.
For example, tor configured with the following would fail:
ORPort auto
DirPort auto
Both end up being the same configuration except that one is a OR listener and
one is a Dir listener. Thus because of the missing check in the inner loop,
they looked exactly the same and thus one is removed.
Fixes#40195
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This changes the behaviour of `tor --version` in such a way.
```console
src/app/tor --version
Tor version 0.4.5.1-alpha-dev (git-46ccde66a97d7985).
Tor is running on Linux with Libevent 2.1.12-stable, OpenSSL 1.1.1h, Zlib 1.2.11, Liblzma 5.2.4, Libzstd 1.4.5 and Glibc 2.31 as libc.
Tor compiled with GCC version 10.2.0
```
Fixes#32102
Commit c3a0f75796 added this feature for ORPort
that we ignore any port that is not the family of our default address when
parsing the port. So if port_parse_config() was called with an IPv4 default
address, all IPv6 address would be ignored.
That makes sense for ORPort since we call twice port_parse_config() for
0.0.0.0 and [::] but for the rest of the ports, it is not good since a
perfectly valid configuration can be:
SocksPort 9050
SocksPort [::1]:9050
Any non-ORPort only binds by default to an IPv4 except the ORPort that binds
to both IPv4 and IPv6 by default.
The fix here is to always parse all ports within port_parse_config() and then,
specifically for ORPort, remove the duplicates or superseding ones. The
warning is only emitted when a port supersedes another.
A unit tests is added to make sure SocksPort of different family always exists
together.
Fixes#40183
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
We already did this, but we did it by accident, which is pretty
risky: if we hadn't, then our code would have treated extra data in
the inbuf as having been transmitted as TLS-authenticated data.
Closes ticket 40017; Found by opara.
