It tried to pick nodes for which only routerinfo_t items are set,
but without setting UseMicroDescriptors to 0. This won't work any
more, now that we're strict about using the right descriptor types
due to 25691/25692/25213.
This is done as follows:
* Only one function (find_dl_schedule()) actually returned a
smartlist. Now it returns an int.
* The CSV_INTERVAL type has been altered to ignore everything
after the first comma, and to store the value before the first
comma in an int.
This commit won't compile. It was made with the following perl
scripts:
s/smartlist_t \*(.*)DownloadSchedule;/int $1DownloadInitialDelay;/;
s/\b(\w*)DownloadSchedule\b/$1DownloadInitialDelay/;
sizeof(ret) is the size of the pointer, not the size of what it
points to. Fortunately, we already have a function to compare
tor_addr_port_t values for equality.
Bugfix on c2c5b13e5d8a77e; bug not in any released Tor. Found by
clang's scan-build.
We recently merged a circuit cell queue size safeguard. This commit adds the
number of killed circuits that have reached the limit to the DoS heartbeat. It
now looks like this:
[notice] DoS mitigation since startup: 0 circuits killed with too many
cells. 0 circuits rejected, 0 marked addresses. 0 connections closed. 0
single hop clients refused.
Second thing that this patch does. It makes tor always print the DoS
mitigation heartbeat line (for a relay) even though no DoS mitigation have
been enabled. The reason is because we now kill circuits that have too many
cells regardless on if it is enabled or not but also it will give the operator
a chance to learn what is enabled with the heartbeat instead of suddenly
appearing when it is enabled by let say the consensus.
Fixes#25824
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Unfortunately, the units passed to
monotime_coarse_stamp_units_to_approx_msec() was always 0 due to a type
conversion.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Really, the uint32_t is only an optimization; any kind of unit
should work fine. Some users might want to use time_t or
monotime_coarse_t or something like that.
Begin by creating a lowest-level triple of the types needed to
implement a token bucket: a configuration, a timestamp, and the raw
bucket itself.
Note that for low-level buckets, the units of the timestamp and the
bucket itself are unspecified: each user can use a different type.
(This patch breaks check-spaces; a later patch will fix it)
This is a simple search-and-replace to rename the token bucket type
to indicate that it contains both a read and a write bucket, bundled
with their configuration. It's preliminary to refactoring the
bucket type.
This test works by having two post-loop events activate one another
in a tight loop. If the "post-loop" mechanism didn't work, this
would be enough to starve all other events.
This differs from our previous token bucket abstraction in a few
ways:
1) It is an abstraction, and not a collection of fields.
2) It is meant to be used with monotonic timestamps, which should
produce better results than calling gettimeofday over and over.
When size_t is 32 bits, the unit tests can't fit anything more than
4GB-1 into a size_t.
Additionally, tt_int_op() uses "long" -- we need tt_u64_op() to
safely test uint64_t values for equality.
Bug caused by tests for #24782 fix; not in any released Tor.
This patch changes the algorithm of compute_real_max_mem_in_queues() to
use 0.4 * RAM iff the system has more than or equal to 8 GB of RAM, but
will continue to use the old value of 0.75 * RAM if the system have less
than * GB of RAM available.
This patch also adds tests for compute_real_max_mem_in_queues().
See: https://bugs.torproject.org/24782
This roughly doubles our test coverage of the bridges.c module.
* ADD new testing module, .../src/test/test_bridges.c.
* CHANGE a few function declarations from `static` to `STATIC`.
* CHANGE one function in transports.c, transport_get_by_name(), to be
mockable.
* CLOSES#25425: https://bugs.torproject.org/25425
* ADD new /src/common/crypto_rand.[ch] module.
* ADD new /src/common/crypto_util.[ch] module (contains the memwipe()
function, since all crypto_* modules need this).
* FIXES part of #24658: https://bugs.torproject.org/24658
This module doesn't actually need to mock the libevent mainloop at
all: it can just use the regular mainloop that the test environment
sets up.
Part of ticket 23750.
This change makes cpuworker and test_workqueue no longer need to
include event2/event.h. Now workqueue.c needs to include it, but
that is at least somewhat logical here.
There's now no difference in these tests w.r.t. the C or Rust: both
fail miserably (well, Rust fails with nice descriptive errors, and C
gives you a traceback, because, well, C).
The DoS potential is slightly higher in C now due to some differences to the
Rust code, see the C_RUST_DIFFERS tags in src/rust/protover/tests/protover.rs.
Also, the comment about "failing at the splitting stage" in Rust wasn't true,
since when we split, we ignore empty chunks (e.g. "1--1" parses into
"(1,None),(None,1)" and "None" can't be parsed into an integer).
Finally, the comment about "Rust seems to experience an internal error" is only
true in debug mode, where u32s are bounds-checked at runtime. In release mode,
code expressing the equivalent of this test will error with
`Err(ProtoverError::Unparseable)` because 4294967295 is too large.
Previously, if "Link=1-5" was supported, and you asked protover_all_supported()
(or protover::all_supported() in Rust) if it supported "Link=3-999", the C
version would return "Link=3-999" and the Rust would return "Link=6-999". These
both behave the same now, i.e. both return "Link=6-999".
There's now no difference in these tests w.r.t. the C or Rust: both
fail miserably (well, Rust fails with nice descriptive errors, and C
gives you a traceback, because, well, C).
The DoS potential is slightly higher in C now due to some differences to the
Rust code, see the C_RUST_DIFFERS tags in src/rust/protover/tests/protover.rs.
Also, the comment about "failing at the splitting stage" in Rust wasn't true,
since when we split, we ignore empty chunks (e.g. "1--1" parses into
"(1,None),(None,1)" and "None" can't be parsed into an integer).
Finally, the comment about "Rust seems to experience an internal error" is only
true in debug mode, where u32s are bounds-checked at runtime. In release mode,
code expressing the equivalent of this test will error with
`Err(ProtoverError::Unparseable)` because 4294967295 is too large.
Previously, if "Link=1-5" was supported, and you asked protover_all_supported()
(or protover::all_supported() in Rust) if it supported "Link=3-999", the C
version would return "Link=3-999" and the Rust would return "Link=6-999". These
both behave the same now, i.e. both return "Link=6-999".
These tests handle incoming and outgoing cells on a three-hop
circuit, and make sure that the crypto works end-to-end. They don't
yet test spec conformance, leaky-pipe, or various error cases.
Additionally, this change extracts the functions that created and
freed these elements.
These structures had common "forward&reverse stream&digest"
elements, but they were initialized and freed through cpath objects,
and different parts of the code depended on them. Now all that code
is extacted, and kept in relay_crypto.c
This should help us improve modularity, and should also make it
easier for people to experiment with other relay crypto strategies
down the road.
This commit is pure function movement.
This should avoid most intermittent test failures on developer and CI machines,
but there could (and probably should) be a more elegant solution.
Also, this test was testing that the IP was created and its expiration time was
set to a time greater than or equal to `now+INTRO_POINT_LIFETIME_MIN_SECONDS+5`:
/* Time to expire MUST also be in that range. We add 5 seconds because
* there could be a gap between setting now and the time taken in
* service_intro_point_new. On ARM, it can be surprisingly slow... */
tt_u64_op(ip->time_to_expire, OP_GE,
now + INTRO_POINT_LIFETIME_MIN_SECONDS + 5);
However, this appears to be a typo, since, according to the comment above it,
adding five seconds was done because the IP creation can be slow on some
systems. But the five seconds is added to the *minimum* time we're comparing
against, and so it actually functions to make this test *more* likely to fail on
slower systems. (It should either subtract five seconds, or instead add it to
time_to_expire.)
* FIXES#25450: https://bugs.torproject.org/25450
These were meant to demonstrate old behavior, or old rust behavior.
One of them _should_ work in Rust, but won't because of
implementation details. We'll fix that up later.
The C code and the rust code had different separate integer overflow
bugs here. That suggests that we're better off just forbidding this
pathological case.
Also, add tests for expected behavior on receiving a bad protocol
list in a consensus.
Fixes another part of 25249.
