options->DirPort is 0 in the unit tests, so
router_get_advertised_dir_port() would return 0 so we wouldn't pick a
dirport. This isn't what we want for the unit tests. Fixes bug
introduced in 95ac3ea594.
Previously, Tor would dereference a NULL pointer and crash if
lookup_last_hid_serv_request were called before the first call to
directory_clean_last_hid_serv_requests. As far as I can tell, that's
currently impossible, but I want that undocumented invariant to go away
in case I^Wwe break it someday.
An elusive compile-error (MingW-gcc v4.50 on Win_XP); a missing
comma (!) and a typo ('err_msg' at line 277 changed to 'errmsg').
Aso changed the format for 'err_code' at line 293 into a "%ld" to suppress
a warning. How did this go unnoticed for ~1 month? Btw. This is my 1st ever
'git commit', so it better work.
When we introduced NEED_KEY_1024 in routerparse.c back in
0.2.0.1-alpha, I forgot to add a *8 when logging the length of a
bad-length key.
Bugfix for 3318 on 0.2.0.1-alpha.
The patch for 3228 made us try to run init_keys() before we had loaded
our state file, resulting in an assert inside init_keys. We had moved
it too early in the function.
Now it's later in the function, but still above the accounting calls.
The comment fixes are trivial. The defensive programming trick is to
tolerate receiving NULL inputs on the describe functions. That should
never actually happen, but it seems like the likeliest mistake for us
to make in the future.
Previously we did this nearer to the end (in the old_options &&
transition_affects_workers() block). But other stuff cares about
keys being consistent with options... particularly anything which
tries to access a key, which can die in assert_identity_keys_ok().
Fixes bug 3228; bugfix on 0.2.2.18-alpha.
Fixes part of #1297; bugfix on 48e0228f1e,
when circuit_expire_building was changed to assume that timestamp_dirty
was set when a circuit changed purpose to _C_REND_READY. (It wasn't.)
The previous attempt was incomplete: it told us not to publish a
descriptor, but didn't stop us from generating one. Now we treat an
absent OR port the same as not knowing our address. (This means
that when we _do_ get an OR port, we need to mark the descriptor
dirty.)
More attempt to fix bug3216.
This situation can happen easily if you set 'ORPort auto' and
'AccountingMax'. Doing so means that when you have no ORPort, you
won't be able to set an ORPort in a descriptor, so instead you would
just generate lots of invalid descriptors, freaking out all the time.
Possible fix for 3216; fix on 0.2.2.26-beta.
We had all the code in place to handle this right... except that we
were unconditionally opening a PF_INET socket instead of looking at
sa_family. Ow.
Fixes bug 2574; not a bugfix on any particular version, since this
never worked before.
Most instances were dead code; for those, I removed the assignments.
Some were pieces of info we don't currently plan to use, but which
we might in the future. For those, I added an explicit cast-to-void
to indicate that we know that the thing's unused. Finally, one was
a case where we were testing the wrong variable in a unit test.
That one I fixed.
This resolves bug 3208.
It used to mean "Force": it would tell tor-resolve to ask tor to
resolve an address even if it ended with .onion. But when
AutomapHostsOnResolve was added, automatically refusing to resolve
.onion hosts stopped making sense. So in 0.2.1.16-rc (commit
298dc95dfd), we made tor-resolve happy to resolve anything.
The -F option stayed in, though, even though it didn't do anything.
Oddly, it never got documented.
Found while fixing GCC 4.6 "set, unused variable" warnings.
On win64, sockets are of type UINT_PTR; on win32 they're u_int;
elsewhere they're int. The correct windows way to check a socket for
being set is to compare it with INVALID_SOCKET; elsewhere you see if
it is negative.
On Libevent 2, all callbacks take sockets as evutil_socket_t; we've
been passing them int.
This patch should fix compilation and correctness when built for
64-bit windows. Fixes bug 3270.
We used to regenerate our descriptor whenever we'd get a sighup. This
was caused by a bug in options_transition_affects_workers() that would
return true even if the options were exactly the same. Down the call
path we'd call init_keys(), which made us make a new descriptor which
the authorities would reject, and the node would subsequently fall out
of the consensus.
This patch fixes only the first part of this bug:
options_transition_affects_workers() behaves correctly now. The second
part still wants a fix.
