The rend_cache/entry_free was missing the rend cache allocation increment
before freeing the object.
Without it, it had an underflow bug:
Sep 17 08:40:13.845 [warn] rend_cache_decrement_allocation(): Bug: Underflow
in rend_cache_decrement_allocation (on Tor 0.4.5.0-alpha-dev
7eef9ced61)
Fixes#40125
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
tl;dr We were not counting cells flying from the client to the service, but we
were counting cells flying from the service to the client.
When a rendezvous cell arrives from the client to the RP, the RP forwards it to
the service.
For this to happen, the cell first passes through command_process_relay_cell()
which normally does the statistics counting. However because the `rend_circ`
circuit was not flagged with `circuit_carries_hs_traffic_stats` in
rend_mid_rendezvous(), the cell is not counted there.
Then the cell goes to circuit_receive_relay_cell() which has a special code
block based on `rend_splice` specifically for rendezvous cells, and the cell
gets directly passed to `rend_circ` via a direct call to
circuit_receive_relay_cell(). The cell never passes through
command_process_relay_cell() ever again and hence is never counted by our
rephist module.
The fix here is to flag the `rend_circ` circuit with
`circuit_carries_hs_traffic_stats` so that the cell is counted as soon as it
hits command_process_relay_cell().
Furthermore we avoid double-counting cells since the special code block of
circuit_receive_relay_cell() makes us count rendezvous cells only as they enter
the RP and not as they exit it.
Fixes#40117.
Opening a new listener connection can fail in many ways like a bind()
permission denied on a low port for instance.
And thus, we should expect to handle an error when creating a new one instead
of assert() on it.
To hit the removed assert:
ORPort 80
KeepBindCapabilities 0
Start tor. Then edit torrc:
ORPort <some-IP>:80
HUP tor and the assert is hit.
Fixes#40073
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This function once served to let circuits continue to be built over
version-1 link connections. But such connections are long-obsolete,
and it's time to remove this check.
Closes#40081.
We found this in #40076, after we started using buf_move_all() in
more places. Fixes bug #40076; bugfix on 0.3.3.1-alpha. As far as
I know, the crash only affects master, but I think this warrants a
backport, "just in case".
Without this fix, if an PT forgets to send a USERADDR command, that
results in a connection getting treated as local for the purposes of
rate-limiting.
If the PT _does_ use USERADDR, we still believe it.
Closes ticket 33747.
Previously we tolerated up to 1.5 connections for every relay we
were connected to, and didn't warn if we had fewer than 5
connections total.
Now we tolerate up to 1.5 connections per relay, and up to 4
connections per authority, and we don't warn at all when we have
fewer than 25 connections total.
Fixes bug 33880, which seems to have been provoked by our #17592
change in 0.3.5.
This patch ensures that we strip "\r" characters on both Windows as well
as Unix when we read text files. This should prevent the issue where
some Tor state files have been moved from a Windows machine, and thus
contains CRLF line ending, to a Unix machine where only \n is needed.
We add a test-case to ensure that we handle this properly on all our
platforms.
See: https://bugs.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor/33781
For some reasons, Appveyor started to use the stdio printf format for 64 bit
values (PRIu64, ...). Mingw doesn't like that so force it to use the Windows
specific macros by setting D__USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO=0.
Fixes#40026
This patch changes our bits-to-bytes conversion logic in the NSS
implementation of `tor_tls_cert_matches_key()` from using (x >> 3) to
((x + 7) >> 3) since DER bit-strings are allowed to contain a number of
bits that is not a multiple of 8.
Additionally, we add a comment on why we cannot use the
`DER_ConvertBitString()` macro from NSS, as we would potentially apply
the bits-to-bytes conversion logic twice, which would lead to an
insignificant amount of bytes being compared in
`SECITEM_ItemsAreEqual()` and thus turn the logic into being a
prefix match instead of a full match.
The `DER_ConvertBitString()` macro is defined in NSS as:
/*
** Macro to convert der decoded bit string into a decoded octet
** string. All it needs to do is fiddle with the length code.
*/
#define DER_ConvertBitString(item) \
{ \
(item)->len = ((item)->len + 7) >> 3; \
}
Thanks to Taylor Yu for spotting this problem.
This patch is part of the fix for TROVE-2020-001.
See: https://bugs.torproject.org/33119
We add constness to `peer_info_orig_len` and `cert_info_orig_len` in
`tor_tls_cert_matches_key` to ensure that we don't accidentally alter
the variables.
This patch is part of the fix for TROVE-2020-001.
See: https://bugs.torproject.org/33119
This patch fixes an out-of-bound memory read in
`tor_tls_cert_matches_key()` when Tor is compiled to use Mozilla's NSS
instead of OpenSSL.
The NSS library stores some length fields in bits instead of bytes, but
the comparison function found in `SECITEM_ItemsAreEqual()` needs the
length to be encoded in bytes. This means that for a 140-byte,
DER-encoded, SubjectPublicKeyInfo struct (with a 1024-bit RSA public key
in it), we would ask `SECITEM_ItemsAreEqual()` to compare the first 1120
bytes instead of 140 (140bytes * 8bits = 1120bits).
This patch fixes the issue by converting from bits to bytes before
calling `SECITEM_ItemsAreEqual()` and convert the `len`-fields back to
bits before we leave the function.
This patch is part of the fix for TROVE-2020-001.
See: https://bugs.torproject.org/33119
This patch lifts the `tor_tls_cert_matches_key()` tests out of the
OpenSSL specific TLS test suite and moves it into the generic TLS test
suite that is executed for both OpenSSL and NSS.
This patch is largely a code movement, but we had to rewrite parts of
the test to avoid using OpenSSL specific data-types (such as `X509 *`)
and replace it with the generic Tor abstraction type
(`tor_x509_cert_impl_t *`).
This patch is part of the fix for TROVE-2020-001.
See: https://bugs.torproject.org/33119
This is not actually a bug! It can happen for a bunch of reasons,
which all boil down to "trying to add an extrainfo for which we no
longer have the corresponding routerinfo".
Fixes#16016; bugfix on 0.2.6.3-alpha.
