debug-level since it will be quite common. logged at both client
and server side. this step should help us track what's going on
with people filtering tor connections by our ssl habits.
Original message from bug3393:
check_private_dir() to ensure that ControlSocketsGroupWritable is
safe to use. Unfortunately, check_private_dir() only checks against
the currently running user… which can be root until privileges are
dropped to the user and group configured by the User config option.
The attached patch fixes the issue by adding a new effective_user
argument to check_private_dir() and updating the callers. It might
not be the best way to fix the issue, but it did in my tests.
(Code by lunar; changelog by nickm)
When we added the check for key size, we required that the keys be
128 bytes. But RSA_size (which defers to BN_num_bytes) will return
128 for keys of length 1017..1024. This patch adds a new
crypto_pk_num_bits() that returns the actual number of significant
bits in the modulus, and uses that to enforce key sizes.
Also, credit the original bug3318 in the changes file.
UseBridges 1 now means "connect only to bridges; if you know no
bridges, don't make connections." UseBridges auto means "Use bridges
if they are known, and we have no EntryNodes set, and we aren't a
server." UseBridges 0 means "don't use bridges."
options->DirPort is 0 in the unit tests, so
router_get_advertised_dir_port() would return 0 so we wouldn't pick a
dirport. This isn't what we want for the unit tests. Fixes bug
introduced in 95ac3ea594.
Previously, Tor would dereference a NULL pointer and crash if
lookup_last_hid_serv_request were called before the first call to
directory_clean_last_hid_serv_requests. As far as I can tell, that's
currently impossible, but I want that undocumented invariant to go away
in case I^Wwe break it someday.
When we introduced NEED_KEY_1024 in routerparse.c back in
0.2.0.1-alpha, I forgot to add a *8 when logging the length of a
bad-length key.
Bugfix for 3318 on 0.2.0.1-alpha.
The patch for 3228 made us try to run init_keys() before we had loaded
our state file, resulting in an assert inside init_keys. We had moved
it too early in the function.
Now it's later in the function, but still above the accounting calls.
The comment fixes are trivial. The defensive programming trick is to
tolerate receiving NULL inputs on the describe functions. That should
never actually happen, but it seems like the likeliest mistake for us
to make in the future.
Previously we did this nearer to the end (in the old_options &&
transition_affects_workers() block). But other stuff cares about
keys being consistent with options... particularly anything which
tries to access a key, which can die in assert_identity_keys_ok().
Fixes bug 3228; bugfix on 0.2.2.18-alpha.
Fixes part of #1297; bugfix on 48e0228f1e,
when circuit_expire_building was changed to assume that timestamp_dirty
was set when a circuit changed purpose to _C_REND_READY. (It wasn't.)
The previous attempt was incomplete: it told us not to publish a
descriptor, but didn't stop us from generating one. Now we treat an
absent OR port the same as not knowing our address. (This means
that when we _do_ get an OR port, we need to mark the descriptor
dirty.)
More attempt to fix bug3216.
This situation can happen easily if you set 'ORPort auto' and
'AccountingMax'. Doing so means that when you have no ORPort, you
won't be able to set an ORPort in a descriptor, so instead you would
just generate lots of invalid descriptors, freaking out all the time.
Possible fix for 3216; fix on 0.2.2.26-beta.
We had all the code in place to handle this right... except that we
were unconditionally opening a PF_INET socket instead of looking at
sa_family. Ow.
Fixes bug 2574; not a bugfix on any particular version, since this
never worked before.
Most instances were dead code; for those, I removed the assignments.
Some were pieces of info we don't currently plan to use, but which
we might in the future. For those, I added an explicit cast-to-void
to indicate that we know that the thing's unused. Finally, one was
a case where we were testing the wrong variable in a unit test.
That one I fixed.
This resolves bug 3208.
