George pointed out that (-1,0,1) for (never usable, maybe usable
later, usable right now) was a pretty rotten convention that made
the code harder to read.
Here we handle most (all?) of the remaining tasks, and fix some
bugs, in the prop271 bridge implementation.
* We record bridge identities as we learn them.
* We only call deprecated functions from bridges.c when the
deprecated guard algorithm is in use.
* We update any_bridge_descriptors_known() and
num_bridges_usable() to work correctly with the new backend
code. (Previously, they called into the guard selection logic.
* We update bridge directory fetches to work with the new
guard code.
* We remove some erroneous assertions where we assumed that we'd
never load a guard that wasn't for the current selection.
Also, we fix a couple of typos.
Still missing is functionality for picking bridges when we don't
know a descriptor for them yet, and functionality for learning a
bridge ID.
Everything else remains (basically) the same. Neat!
This includes:
* making bridge_info_t exposed but opaque
* allowing guards where we don't know an identity
* making it possible to learn the identity of a guard
* creating a guard that lacks a node_t
* remembering a guard's address and port.
* Looking up a guard by address and port.
* Only enforcing the rule that we need a live consensus to update
the "listed" status for guards when we are not using bridges.
This is safe, because no entry_guard_t ever outlives its
guard_selection_t.
I want this because now that multiple guard selections can be active
during one tor session, we should make sure that any information we
register about guards is with respect to the selection that they came
from.
Currently, this code doesn't actually have the contexts behave
differently, (except for the legacy context), but it does switch
back and forth between them nicely.
If a guard becomes primary as a result of confirming it, consider
the circuit through that guard as a primary circuit.
Also, note open questions on behavior when confirming nonprimary guards
Some of these will get torrc options to override them too; this
is just the mechanical conversion.
Also, add documentation for a couple of undocumented (but now used)
parameters.
Act I.
" But that I am forbid
To tell the secrets of my prison-house,
I could a tale unfold..."
Here's the bug: sometimes, rend_cache/store_v2_desc_as_client would
say:
"Dec 15 08:31:26.147 [warn] rend_cache_store_v2_desc_as_client():
Bug: Couldn't decode base32 [scrubbed] for descriptor id. (on Tor
0.3.0.0-alpha-dev 4098bfa260)"
When we merged ade5005853 back in 0.2.8.1-alpha, we added that
test: it mangles the hidden service ID for a hidden service, and
ensures that when the descriptor ID doesn't match the descriptor's
key, we don't store the descriptor.
How did it mangle the descriptor ID? By doing
desc_id_base32[0]++;
So, if the hidden service ID started with z or 7, we'd wind up with an
invalid base32 string, and get the warning. And if it started with
any other character, we wouldn't.
That there is part 1 of the bug: in 2/32 cases, we'd get a BUG
warning. But we wouldn't display it, since warnings weren't shown
from the unit tests.
Act II.
"Our indiscretion sometime serves us well,
When our deep plots do pall"
Part two: in 0.2.9.3-alpha, for part of #19999, we turned on BUG
warnings in the unit tests, so that we'd actually start seeing them.
At this point we also began to consider each BUG warning that made
it through the unit tests to be an actual bug. So before this
point, we wouldn't actually notice anything happening in those 2/32
cases.
So, at this point it was a nice random _visible_ bug.
Act III.
"Our thoughts are ours, their ends none of our own"
In acbb60cd63, which was part of my prop220 work, I
changed how RSA key generation worked in the unit tests. While
previously we'd use pre-made RSA keys in some cases, this change
made us use a set of pregenerated RSA keys for _all_ 1024 or 2048
keys, and to return them in a rotation when Tor tried to generate a
key.
And now we had the heisenbug: anything that affected the number of
pregenerated keys that we had yielded before reaching
rend_cache/store_v2_desc_as_client would make us return a different
key, which would give us a different base32 ID, which would make the
bug occur, or not. So as we added or removed test cases, the bug
might or might not happen.
So yeah. Don't mangle a base32 ID like that. Do it this way instead.
The new HS circuitmap API replaces old public functions as follows:
circuit_clear_rend_token -> hs_circuitmap_remove_circuit
circuit_get_rendezvous -> hs_circuitmap_get_rend_circ
circuit_get_intro_point -> hs_circuitmap_get_intro_circ_v2
circuit_set_rendezvous_cookie -> hs_circuitmap_register_rend_circ
circuit_set_intro_point_digest -> hs_circuitmap_register_intro_circ_v2
This commit also removes the old rendinfo code that is now unused.
It also fixes the broken rendinfo unittests.
The HS circuitmap is a hash table that maps introduction and rendezvous
tokens to specific circuits such that given a token it's easy to find
the corresponding circuit. It supports rend circuits and v2/v3 intro
circuits.
It will be used by the prop224 ESTABLISH_INTRO code to register and
lookup v3 introduction circuits.
The next commit after this removes the old code and fixes the unittests.
Please consult both commits while reviewing functionality differences
between the old and new code. Let me know if you want this rebased
differently :)
WRT architectural differences, this commit removes the rendinfo pointer
from or_circuit_t. It then adds an hs_token_t pointer and a hashtable
node for the HS circuitmap. IIUC, this adds another pointer to the
weight of or_circuit_t. Let me know if you don't like this, or if you
have suggestions on improving it.
Back when Roger had do do most of our testing on the moria host, we
needed a higher limit for the number of relays running on a single
IP address when that limit was shared with an authority. Nowadays,
the idea is pretty obsolete.
Also remove the router_addr_is_trusted_dir() function, which served
no other purpose.
Closes ticket 20960.
In c35fad2bde, merged in
0.2.4.7-alpha, we removed the code to parse v1 directory
objects. When we did so, we removed everything that could set the
CST_CHECK_AUTHORITY flag for check_signature_token().
So in this code, we remove the flag itself, the code to handle the
flag, and a function that only existed to handle the flag.
Circuit object wasn't freed correctly. Also, the cpath build state object
needed to be zeroed else we were freeing garbage pointers.
Closes#20936
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
The signed_descriptor_move() was not releasing memory inside the destination
object before overwriting it with the source object. This commit adds a reset
function that free that memory inside a signed descriptor object and zero it.
Closes#20715.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This was breaking the build on debian precise, since it thought that
using a 'const int' to dimension an array made that array
variable-size, and made us not get protection.
Bug not in any released version of Tor.
I will insist that this one wasn't my fault.
"Variables won't. Constants aren't." -- Osborn's Law
If a node can prove its Ed25519 identity, don't consider connections
to it canonical unless they match both identities.
Includes link handshake changes needed to avoid crashing with bug
warnings, since the tests now reach more parts of the code.
Closes ticket 20355
(Only run the connection_or_group_set_badness_() function on groups
of channels that have the same RSA and Ed25519 identities.)
There's a possible opportunity here where we might want to set a
channel to "bad" if it has no ed25519 identity and some other
channel has some. Also there's an opportunity to add a warning if
we ever have an Ed mismatch on open connections with the same RSA
ID.
This function has never gotten testing for the case where an
identity had been set, and then got set to something else. Rather
than make it handle those cases, we forbid them.
If there is some horrible bug in our ed25519 link authentication
code that causes us to label every single ed25519-having node as
non-running, we'll be glad we had this. Otherwise we can remove it
later.
This patch makes two absolutely critical changes:
- If an ed25519 identity is not as expected when creating a channel,
we call that channel unsuccessful and close it.
- When a client creating a channel or an extend cell for a circuit, we
only include the ed25519 identity if we believe that the node on
the other side supports ed25519 link authentication (from
#15055). Otherwise we will insist on nodes without the right
link protocol authenticating themselves.
- When deciding to extend to another relay, we only upgrade the
extend to extend by ed25519 ID when we know the ed25519 ID _and_
we know that the other side can authenticate.
This patch also tells directory servers, when probing nodes, to
try to check their ed25519 identities too (if they can authenticate
by ed25519 identity).
Also, handle the case where we connect by RSA Id, and learn the
ED25519 ID for the node in doing so.
