Also, re-enable the #if'd out condition-variable code.
Work queues are going to make us hack on all of this stuff a bit more
closely, so it might not be a terrible idea to make it easier to hack.
Silence clang warnings under --enable-expensive-hardening, including:
+ implicit truncation of 64 bit values to 32 bit;
+ const char assignment to self;
+ tautological compare; and
+ additional parentheses around equality tests. (gcc uses these to
silence assignment, so clang warns when they're present in an
equality test. But we need to use extra parentheses in macros to
isolate them from other code).
Long ago we supported systems where there was no support for
threads, or where the threading library was broken. We shouldn't
have do that any more: on every OS that matters, threads exist, and
the OS supports running threads across multiple CPUs.
This resolves tickets 9495 and 12439. It's a prerequisite to making
our workqueue code work better, since sensible workqueue
implementations don't split across multiple processes.
(If we don't restrict rename, there's not much point in restricting
open, since an attacker could always use rename to make us open
whatever they want.)
clang 3.4 introduced a new by-default warning about unused static
functions, which we triggered heavily for the hashtable and map function
generating macros. We can use __attribute__ ((unused)) (thanks nickm for
the suggestion :-) ) to silence these warnings.
We need a weak RNG in a couple of places where the strong RNG is
both needless and too slow. We had been using the weak RNG from our
platform's libc implementation, but that was problematic (because
many platforms have exceptionally horrible weak RNGs -- like, ones
that only return values between 0 and SHORT_MAX) and because we were
using it in a way that was wrong for LCG-based weak RNGs. (We were
counting on the low bits of the LCG output to be as random as the
high ones, which isn't true.)
This patch adds a separate type for a weak RNG, adds an LCG
implementation for it, and uses that exclusively where we had been
using the platform weak RNG.
This is allowed by the C statndard, which permits you to represent
doubles any way you like, but in practice we have some code that
assumes that memset() clears doubles in structs. Noticed as part of
7802 review; see 8081 for more info.
In C, we technically aren't supposed to define our own things that
start with an underscore.
This is a purely machine-generated commit. First, I ran this script
on all the headers in src/{common,or,test,tools/*}/*.h :
==============================
use strict;
my %macros = ();
my %skipped = ();
FILE: for my $fn (@ARGV) {
my $f = $fn;
if ($fn !~ /^\.\//) {
$f = "./$fn";
}
$skipped{$fn} = 0;
open(F, $fn);
while (<F>) {
if (/^#ifndef ([A-Za-z0-9_]+)/) {
$macros{$fn} = $1;
next FILE;
}
}
}
print "#!/usr/bin/perl -w -i -p\n\n";
for my $fn (@ARGV) {
if (! exists $macros{$fn}) {
print "# No macro known for $fn!\n" if (!$skipped{$fn});
next;
}
if ($macros{$fn} !~ /_H_?$/) {
print "# Weird macro for $fn...\n";
}
my $goodmacro = uc $fn;
$goodmacro =~ s#.*/##;
$goodmacro =~ s#[\/\-\.]#_#g;
print "s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])$macros{$fn}(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_${goodmacro}/g;\n"
}
==============================
It produced the following output, which I then re-ran on those same files:
==============================
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_ADDRESS_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_ADDRESS_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_AES_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_AES_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_COMPAT_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_COMPAT_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_COMPAT_LIBEVENT_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_COMPAT_LIBEVENT_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_CONTAINER_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CONTAINER_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_CRYPTO_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CRYPTO_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])TOR_DI_OPS_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_DI_OPS_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_MEMAREA_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_MEMAREA_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_MEMPOOL_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_MEMPOOL_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])TOR_PROCMON_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_PROCMON_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_TORGZIP_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_TORGZIP_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_TORINT_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_TORINT_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_LOG_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_TORLOG_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_TORTLS_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_TORTLS_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_UTIL_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_UTIL_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_BUFFERS_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_BUFFERS_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_CHANNEL_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CHANNEL_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_CHANNEL_TLS_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CHANNELTLS_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_CIRCUITBUILD_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CIRCUITBUILD_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_CIRCUITLIST_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CIRCUITLIST_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_CIRCUITMUX_EWMA_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CIRCUITMUX_EWMA_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_CIRCUITMUX_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CIRCUITMUX_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_CIRCUITUSE_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CIRCUITUSE_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_COMMAND_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_COMMAND_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_CONFIG_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CONFIG_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])TOR_CONFPARSE_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CONFPARSE_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_CONNECTION_EDGE_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CONNECTION_EDGE_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_CONNECTION_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CONNECTION_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_CONNECTION_OR_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CONNECTION_OR_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_CONTROL_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CONTROL_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_CPUWORKER_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CPUWORKER_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_DIRECTORY_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_DIRECTORY_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_DIRSERV_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_DIRSERV_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_DIRVOTE_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_DIRVOTE_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_DNS_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_DNS_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_DNSSERV_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_DNSSERV_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])TOR_EVENTDNS_TOR_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_EVENTDNS_TOR_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_GEOIP_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_GEOIP_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_HIBERNATE_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_HIBERNATE_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_MAIN_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_MAIN_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_MICRODESC_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_MICRODESC_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_NETWORKSTATUS_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_NETWORKSTATUS_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_NODELIST_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_NODELIST_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_NTMAIN_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_NTMAIN_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_ONION_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_ONION_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_OR_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_OR_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_POLICIES_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_POLICIES_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_REASONS_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_REASONS_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_RELAY_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_RELAY_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_RENDCLIENT_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_RENDCLIENT_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_RENDCOMMON_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_RENDCOMMON_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_RENDMID_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_RENDMID_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_RENDSERVICE_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_RENDSERVICE_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_REPHIST_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_REPHIST_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_REPLAYCACHE_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_REPLAYCACHE_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_ROUTER_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_ROUTER_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_ROUTERLIST_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_ROUTERLIST_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_ROUTERPARSE_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_ROUTERPARSE_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])TOR_ROUTERSET_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_ROUTERSET_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])TOR_STATEFILE_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_STATEFILE_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_STATUS_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_STATUS_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])TOR_TRANSPORTS_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_TRANSPORTS_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_TEST_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_TEST_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_FW_HELPER_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_TOR_FW_HELPER_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_FW_HELPER_NATPMP_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_TOR_FW_HELPER_NATPMP_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_FW_HELPER_UPNP_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_TOR_FW_HELPER_UPNP_H/g;
==============================
Conflicts:
src/common/compat.h
Conflict was between replacement of MS_WINDOWS with _WIN32 in
master, and with removal of file_handle from tor_mmap_t struct in
close_file_mapping branch (for bug 5951 fix).
It turns out that if you set the third argument of
__attribute__(format) to 0, GCC and Clang will check the format
argument without expecting to find variadic arguments. This is the
correct behavior for vsnprintf, vasprintf, and vscanf.
I'm hoping this will fix bug 5969 (a clang warning) by telling clang that
the format argument to tor_vasprintf is indeed a format string.
This tells the windows headers to give us definitions that didn't
exist before XP -- like the ones that we need for IPv6 support.
See bug #5861. We didn't run into this issue with mingw, since
mingw doesn't respect _WIN32_WINNT as well as it should for some of
its definitions.
