When calculating the fraction of nodes that have descriptors, and all
all nodes in the network have zero bandwidths, count the number of nodes
instead.
Fixes bug 23318; bugfix on 0.2.4.10-alpha.
Back in 0.2.4.3-alpha (e106812a77), when we switched from using
double to using uint64 for selecting by bandwidth, I got the math
wrong: I should have used llround(x), or (uint64_t)(x+0.5), but
instead I wrote llround(x+0.5). That means we would always round
up, rather than rounding to the closest integer
Fixes bug 23318; bugfix on 0.2.4.3-alpha.
The flush cells process can close a channel if the connection write fails but
still return that it flushed at least one cell. This is due because the error
is not propagated up the call stack so there is no way of knowing if the flush
actually was successful or not.
Because this would require an important refactoring touching multiple
subsystems, this patch is a bandaid to avoid the KIST scheduler to handle
closed channel in its loop.
Bandaid on #23751.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
dirvote_get_next_valid_after_time() is the only public function that uses the
voting schedule outside of the dirvote subsystem so if it is zeroed,
recalculate its timing if we can that is if a consensus exists.
Part of #24161
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Because the HS and SR subsystems can use the voting schedule early (with the
changes in #23623 making the SR subsystem using the static voting schedule
object), we need to recalculate the schedule very early when setting the new
consensus.
Fixes#24161
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
If it decrypts something that turns out to start with a NUL byte,
then decrypt_desc_layer() will return 0 to indicate the length of
its result. But 0 also indicates an error, which causes the result
not to be freed by decrypt_desc_layer()'s callers.
Since we're trying to stabilize 0.3.2.x, I've opted for the simpler
possible fix here and made it so that an empty decrypted string will
also count as an error.
Fixes bug 24150 and OSS-Fuzz issue 3994.
The original bug was present but unreachable in 0.3.1.1-alpha. I'm
calling this a bugfix on 0.3.2.1-alpha since that's the first version
where you could actually try to decrypt these descriptors.
The node_get_ed25519_id() warning can actually be triggered by a relay flagged
with NoEdConsensus so instead of triggering a warning on all relays of the
network, downgrade it to protocol warning.
Fixes#24025
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
When a BUG() occurs, this macro will print extra information about the state
of the scheduler and the given channel if any. This will help us greatly to
fix future bugs in the scheduler especially when they occur rarely.
Fixes#23753
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
When running "make test-network-all", test that IPv6-only clients can use
microdescriptors. IPv6-only microdescriptor client support was fixed in
tor 0.3.0.1-alpha.
Requires chutney master 61c28b9 or later.
Closes ticket 24109.
They are not yet implemented: they will upload descriptors, but won't be
able to rendezvous, because IPv6 addresses in link specifiers are ignored.
Part of #23820.
The previous version of this function had the following issues:
* it didn't check if the extend_info contained an IPv6 address,
* it didn't check if the ed25519 identity key was valid.
But we can't add IPv6 support in a bugfix release.
Instead, BUG() if the address is an IPv6 address, so we always put IPv4
addresses in link specifiers. And ignore missing ed25519 identifiers,
rather than generating an all-zero link specifier.
This supports v3 hidden services on IPv4, dual-stack, and IPv6, and
v3 single onion services on IPv4 only.
Part of 23820, bugfix on 0.3.2.1-alpha.
When the directory information changes, callback to the HS client subsystem so
it can check if any pending SOCKS connections are waiting for a descriptor. If
yes, attempt a refetch for those.
Fixes#23762
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Because the HS subsystem needs the voting schedule to compute time period, we
need all tor type to do that.
Part of #23623
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
