Otherwise, it's possible to create streams or circuits with these
bogus IDs, leading to orphaned circuits or streams, or to ones that
can cause bandwidth DOS problems.
Fixes bug 7889; bugfix on all released Tors.
The right way to set "MaxOnionsPending" was to adjust it until the
processing delay was appropriate. So instead, let's measure how long
it takes to process onionskins (sampling them once we have a big
number), and then limit the queue based on its expected time to
finish.
This change is extra-necessary for ntor, since there is no longer a
reasonable way to set MaxOnionsPending without knowing what mix of
onionskins you'll get.
This patch also reserves 1/3 of the onionskin spots for ntor
handshakes, on the theory that TAP handshakes shouldn't be allowed to
starve their speedier cousins. We can change this later if need be.
Resolves 7291.
Our old warn_nonlocal_client_ports() would give a bogus warning for
every nonlocal port every time it parsed any ports at all. So if it
parsed a nonlocal socksport, it would complain that it had a nonlocal
socksport...and then turn around and complain about the nonlocal
socksport again, calling it a nonlocal transport or nonlocal dnsport,
if it had any of those.
Fixes bug 7836; bugfix on 0.2.3.3-alpha.
mr-4 reports on #7799 that he was seeing it several times per second,
which suggests that things had gone very wrong.
This isn't a real fix, but it should make Tor usable till we can
figure out the real issue.
This implements the server-side of proposal 198 by detecting when
clients lack the magic list of ciphersuites that indicates that
they're lying faking some ciphers they don't really have. When
clients lack this list, we can choose any cipher that we'd actually
like. The newly allowed ciphersuites are, currently, "All ECDHE-RSA
ciphers that openssl supports, except for ECDHE-RSA-RC4".
The code to detect the cipher list relies on on (ab)use of
SSL_set_session_secret_cb.
This is good enough to give P_success >= 999,999,999/1,000,000,000 so
long as the address space is less than 97.95 full. It'd be ridiculous
for that to happen for IPv6, and usome reasonable assumptions, it
would also be pretty silly for IPv4.
This replaces the old FallbackConsensus notion, and should provide a
way -- assuming we pick reasonable nodes! -- to give clients
suggestions of placs to go to get their first consensus.
This is the simplest possible workaround: make it safe to call
circuit_cell_queue_clear() on a non-attached circuit, and make it
safe-but-a-LD_BUG-warning to call update_circuit_on_cmux() on a
non-attached circuit.
LocalWords: unstage src Untracked
Apparently some compilers like to eliminate memset() operations on
data that's about to go out-of-scope. I've gone with the safest
possible replacement, which might be a bit slow. I don't think this
is critical path in any way that will affect performance, but if it
is, we can work on that in 0.2.4.
Fixes bug 7352.
Instead of warning about low ports that are advertised, we should have
been warning about low ports that we're listening on. Bug 7285, fix
on 0.2.3.9-alpha.
That's not where I'd want to put a $, but apparently the other
foo/id/<identity> things allow it, as does an arguably valid
interpretation of control-spec.txt. So let's be consistent.
Fix for a piece of bug 7059.
This is part of what's needed to build without warnings on mingw64:
it was warning about the cast from void* to long that happened in
the places we were using test_{n,}eq on pointers.
The alternative here would have been to broaden tt_int_op to accept
a long long or an intptr_t, but that's less correct (since pointers
aren't integers), and would hurt the portability of tinytest a
little.
Fixes part of 7260.
We still want to build on compilers w/o c99 support, such as
(notoriously, shamefully) MSVC.
So I'm commenting out the designated initializers in
circuitmux_ewma.c. The alternative would have been to use some kind
of macros to use designated initializers only when they're
supported, but that's error-prone, and can lead to code having
different meanings under different compilers.
Bug 7286; fix on 0.2.4.4-alpha; spotted by Gisle Vanem.
If we completed the handshake for the v2 link protocol but wound up
negotiating the wong protocol version, we'd become so confused about
what part of the handshake we were in that we'd promptly die with an
assertion.
This is a fix for CVE-2012-2250; it's a bugfix on 0.2.3.6-alpha.
All servers running that version or later should really upgrade.
Bug and fix from "some guy from France." I tweaked his code slightly
to make it log the IP of the offending node, and to forward-port it to
0.2.4.
If we completed the handshake for the v2 link protocol but wound up
negotiating the wong protocol version, we'd become so confused about
what part of the handshake we were in that we'd promptly die with an
assertion.
This is a fix for CVE-2012-2250; it's a bugfix on 0.2.3.6-alpha.
All servers running that version or later should really upgrade.
Bug and fix from "some guy from France." I tweaked his code slightly
to make it log the IP of the offending node.
