We found this in #40076, after we started using buf_move_all() in
more places. Fixes bug #40076; bugfix on 0.3.3.1-alpha. As far as
I know, the crash only affects master, but I think this warrants a
backport, "just in case".
Previously we tolerated up to 1.5 connections for every relay we
were connected to, and didn't warn if we had fewer than 5
connections total.
Now we tolerate up to 1.5 connections per relay, and up to 4
connections per authority, and we don't warn at all when we have
fewer than 25 connections total.
Fixes bug 33880, which seems to have been provoked by our #17592
change in 0.3.5.
The need for casting negative syscall arguments depends on the
glibc version. This affects the rules for the openat syscall which
uses the constant AT_FDCWD that is defined as a negative number.
This commit adds logic to only apply the cast when necessary, on
glibc versions from 2.27 onwards.
Different versions of glibc use either open or openat for the
opendir function. This commit adds logic to use the correct rule
for each glibc version, namely:
- Until 2.14 open is used
- From 2.15 to to 2.21 openat is used
- From 2.22 to 2.26 open is used
- From 2.27 onwards openat is used
The need for casting negative syscall arguments depends on the
glibc version. This affects the rules for the openat syscall which
uses the constant AT_FDCWD that is defined as a negative number.
This commit adds logic to only apply the cast when necessary, on
glibc versions from 2.27 onwards.
check-cocci is still a good idea -- perhaps as a cron job? But
doing it as part of our regular tests has just been confusing,
especially to volunteers who shouldn't have to become coccinelle
experts in order to get their patches through our CI.
Closes#40030.
When receiving an introduction NACK, the client either decides to close or
re-extend the circuit to another intro point.
In order to do this, the service descriptor needs to exists but it is possible
that it gets removed from the cache between the establishement of the
introduction circuit and the reception of the (N)ACK.
For that reason, the BUG(desc == NULL) is removed because it is a possible
normal use case. Tor recovers gracefully already.
Fixes#34087
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This commit modifies the behavior of `parse_extended_address` in such a way
that if it fails, it will always return a `BAD_HOSTNAME` value, which is then
used to return the 0xF6 extended error code. This way, in any case that is
not a valid v2 address, we return the 0xF6 error code, which is the expected
behavior.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This reverts commit bf2a399fc0.
Don't set by default the prefer IPv6 feature on client ports because it breaks
the torsocks use case. The SOCKS resolve command is lacking a mechanism to ask
for a specific address family (v4 or v6) thus prioritizing IPv6 when an IPv4
address is asked on the resolve SOCKS interface resulting in a failure.
Tor Browser explicitly set PreferIPv6 so this should not affect the majority
of our users.
Closes#33796
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
For some reasons, Appveyor started to use the stdio printf format for 64 bit
values (PRIu64, ...). Mingw doesn't like that so force it to use the Windows
specific macros by setting D__USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO=0.
Fixes#40026
This patch fixes an out-of-bound memory read in
`tor_tls_cert_matches_key()` when Tor is compiled to use Mozilla's NSS
instead of OpenSSL.
The NSS library stores some length fields in bits instead of bytes, but
the comparison function found in `SECITEM_ItemsAreEqual()` needs the
length to be encoded in bytes. This means that for a 140-byte,
DER-encoded, SubjectPublicKeyInfo struct (with a 1024-bit RSA public key
in it), we would ask `SECITEM_ItemsAreEqual()` to compare the first 1120
bytes instead of 140 (140bytes * 8bits = 1120bits).
This patch fixes the issue by converting from bits to bytes before
calling `SECITEM_ItemsAreEqual()` and convert the `len`-fields back to
bits before we leave the function.
This patch is part of the fix for TROVE-2020-001.
See: https://bugs.torproject.org/33119
If at least one service is configured as a version 2, a log warning is emitted
once and only once.
Closes#40003
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
