GCC added an implicit-fallthrough warning a while back, where it
would complain if you had a nontrivial "case:" block that didn't end
with break, return, or something like that. Clang recently added
the same thing.
GCC, however, would let you annotate a fall-through as intended by
any of various magic "/* fall through */" comments. Clang, however,
only seems to like "__attribute__((fallthrough))". Fortunately, GCC
accepts that too.
A previous commit in this branch defined a FALLTHROUGH macro to do
the right thing if GNUC is defined; here we replace all of our "fall
through" comments with uses of that macro.
This is an automated commit, made with the following perl one-liner:
#!/usr/bin/perl -i -p
s#/\* *falls? ?thr.*?\*/#FALLTHROUGH;#i;
(In order to avoid conflicts, I'm applying this script separately to
each maint branch. This is the 0.4.3 version.)
GCC added an implicit-fallthrough warning a while back, where it
would complain if you had a nontrivial "case:" block that didn't end
with break, return, or something like that. Clang recently added
the same thing.
GCC, however, would let you annotate a fall-through as intended by
any of various magic "/* fall through */" comments. Clang, however,
only seems to like "__attribute__((fallthrough))". Fortunately, GCC
accepts that too.
A previous commit in this branch defined a FALLTHROUGH macro to do
the right thing if GNUC is defined; here we replace all of our "fall
through" comments with uses of that macro.
This is an automated commit, made with the following perl one-liner:
#!/usr/bin/perl -i -p
s#/\* *falls? ?thr.*?\*/#FALLTHROUGH;#i;
(In order to avoid conflicts, I'm applying this script separately to
each maint branch. This is the 0.4.2 version.)
GCC added an implicit-fallthrough warning a while back, where it
would complain if you had a nontrivial "case:" block that didn't end
with break, return, or something like that. Clang recently added
the same thing.
GCC, however, would let you annotate a fall-through as intended by
any of various magic "/* fall through */" comments. Clang, however,
only seems to like "__attribute__((fallthrough))". Fortunately, GCC
accepts that too.
A previous commit in this branch defined a FALLTHROUGH macro to do
the right thing if GNUC is defined; here we replace all of our "fall
through" comments with uses of that macro.
This is an automated commit, made with the following perl one-liner:
#!/usr/bin/perl -i -p
s#/\* *falls? ?thr.*?\*/#FALLTHROUGH;#i;
(In order to avoid conflicts, I'm applying this script separately to
each maint branch. This is the 0.4.1 version.)
GCC added an implicit-fallthrough warning a while back, where it
would complain if you had a nontrivial "case:" block that didn't end
with break, return, or something like that. Clang recently added
the same thing.
GCC, however, would let you annotate a fall-through as intended by
any of various magic "/* fall through */" comments. Clang, however,
only seems to like "__attribute__((fallthrough))". Fortunately, GCC
accepts that too.
A previous commit in this branch defined a FALLTHROUGH macro to do
the right thing if GNUC is defined; here we replace all of our "fall
through" comments with uses of that macro.
This is an automated commit, made with the following perl one-liner:
#!/usr/bin/perl -i -p
s#/\* *falls? ?thr.*?\*/#FALLTHROUGH;#i;
This macro defers to __attribute__((fallthrough)) on GCC (and
clang). Previously we had been using GCC's magic /* fallthrough */
comments, but clang very sensibly doesn't accept those.
Since not all compiler recognize it, we only define it when our
configure script detects that it works.
Part of a fix for 34078.
Move a series of function from config.c into that new file which is related to
address resolving.
Part of #33789
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This commit moves router_pick_published_address() and the related helper
functions into the new file.
The log_addr_has_changed() function has been made public in router.h so we can
use it in relay_resolve_addr.c.
This is a refactoring as part of Sponsor 55. Only code movement at this
commit.
Part of #33789
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Do not try to stuff "HS_DESC_DECODE_GENERIC_ERROR" (-1) into a
socks5_reply_status_t (enum). It doesn't actually make sense, and
isn't one of our documented extensions.
(This can only happen on a nonfatal assertion that we haven't seen,
so it probably isn't happening in practice.)
Fixes another case of bug 34077; bugfix on 0.4.3.1-alpha.
Allow relays and bridges to send IPv4 or IPv6 extend cells.
But keep restricting clients to IPv4 extend cells, because sending IPv6
extend cells would be an obvious version distinguisher.
Part of 33222.
When a relay starts testing reachability, log its IPv6 ORPort.
The existing code logs the IPv4 ORPort and DirPort.
The IPv4 ORPort is required. The other ports are only logged if they
are present.
Part of 33222.
This is an automated commit, generated by this command:
./scripts/maint/rename_c_identifier.py \
check_whether_orport_reachable router_skip_orport_reachability_check \
check_whether_dirport_reachable router_skip_dirport_reachability_check
It was generated with --no-verify, so it probably breaks some commit hooks.
The commiter should be sure to fix them up in a subsequent commit.
Part of 33222.
Change some function names to distinguish between:
* client first hop reachability (ReachableAddresses)
* relay port reachability self-tests
This is an automated commit, generated by this command:
./scripts/maint/rename_c_identifier.py \
router_skip_or_reachability router_connect_assume_or_reachable \
router_skip_dir_reachability router_connect_assume_dir_reachable
It was generated with --no-verify, so it probably breaks some commit hooks.
The commiter should be sure to fix them up in a subsequent commit.
Part of 33222.
Split "can extend over IPv6" and "has advertised IPv6 ORPort" into
separate functions. They currently have the same result, but this may
change in 33818 with ExtendAllowIPv6Addresses.
Part of 33817.
Refactor circuit_open_connection_for_extend(), splitting out the IP
address choice code into a new function.
Adds unit tests. No behaviour changes in tor.
Part of 33817.
Some tests use IF_BUG_ONCE(), which is fatal when ALL_BUGS_ARE_FATAL,
after the fixes in 33917.
Also run "make autostyle" on these changes.
Part of 33817.
... and DISABLE_ASSERTS_IN_UNIT_TESTS.
Make all of tor's assertion macros support the ALL_BUGS_ARE_FATAL and
DISABLE_ASSERTS_IN_UNIT_TESTS debugging modes.
Implements these modes for IF_BUG_ONCE(). (It used to log a non-fatal
warning, regardless of the debugging mode.)
Fixes bug 33917; bugfix on 0.2.9.1-alpha.
Allow extend cells with IPv6-only link specifiers.
Warn and fail if both IPv4 and IPv6 are invalid.
Also warn if the IPv4 or IPv6 addresses are unexpectedly internal,
but continue with the valid address.
Part of 33817.
Add fmt_addrport_ap(), a macro that takes a tor_addr_port_t, and uses
it to call fmt_addrport().
Add fmt_addr_family(), a function that returns a string constant
describing the address family.
Utility functions for 33817.
Allow clients and relays to send dual-stack and IPv6-only EXTEND2 cells.
Parse dual-stack and IPv6-only EXTEND2 cells on relays.
Relays do not make connections or extend circuits via IPv6: that's the
next step.
Closes ticket 33901.
Log IPv6 addresses on connections where this relay is the responder.
Previously, responding relays would replace the remote IPv6 address with
the IPv4 address from the consensus.
(The port is replaced with the IPv6 ORPort from the consensus, we will
resolve this issue in 33898.)
Fixes bug 33899; bugfix on 0.3.1.1-alpha.
Consider IPv6 addresses when checking if a connection is canonical.
In 17604, relays assumed that a remote relay could consider an IPv6
connection canonical, but did not set the canonical flag on their side
of the connection.
Fixes bug 33899; bugfix on 0.3.1.1-alpha.
The client auth protocol allows attacker-controlled x25519 private keys being
passed around, which allows an attacker to potentially trigger the all-zeroes
assert for client_auth_sk in hs_descriptor.c:decrypt_descriptor_cookie().
We fixed that by making sure that an all-zeroes client auth key will not be
used.
There are no guidelines for validating x25519 private keys, and the assert was
there as a sanity check for code flow issues (we don't want to enter that
function with an unitialized key if client auth is being used). To avoid such
crashes in the future, we also changed the assert to a BUG-and-err.
This change broke torsocks that by default is expecting an IPv4 for hostname
resolution because it can't ask tor for a specific IP version with the SOCKS5
extension.
PreferIPv6 made it that sometimes the IPv6 could be returned to torsocks that
was expecting an IPv4.
Torsocks is probably a very unique case because the runtime flow is that it
hijacks DNS resolution (ex: getaddrinfo()), gets an IP and then sends it back
for the connect() to happen.
The libc has DNS resolution functions that allows the caller to request a
specific INET family but torsocks can't tell tor to resolve the hostname only
to an IPv4 or IPv6 and thus by default fallsback to IPv4.
Reverting this change into 0.4.3.x series but we'll keep it in the 0.4.4.x
series in the hope that we add this SOCKS5 extension to tor for DNS resolution
and then change torsocks to use that.
Fixes#33804
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
circuit_extend() may be called when a client receives an extend cell,
even if the relay module is disabled.
Log a protocol warning when the relay module is disabled.
Part of 33633.
