We should only assign a relay the HSDir flag if it is currently
considered valid. We can accomplish this by only considering active
relays, and as a consequence of this we also exclude relays that are
currently hibernating. Fixes#12573
Long ago we supported systems where there was no support for
threads, or where the threading library was broken. We shouldn't
have do that any more: on every OS that matters, threads exist, and
the OS supports running threads across multiple CPUs.
This resolves tickets 9495 and 12439. It's a prerequisite to making
our workqueue code work better, since sensible workqueue
implementations don't split across multiple processes.
I don't know whether we missed these or misclassified them when we
first made the "DIRECTORY AUTHORITY SERVER OPTIONS" section, but they
really belong there.
The variable was useless since it was only toggled off in disabled code.
If the 'exit_family' smartlist is empty, we don't consider exit family
anyway.
The fix for bug 8746 added a hashtable instance that never actually
invoked HT_FIND. This caused a warning, since we didn't mark HT_FIND
as okay-not-to-use.
Try killing a running process; try noticing that a process has
exited without checking its output; verify that waitpid_cb (when
present) is set to NULL when you would expect it to be.
When we create a process yourself with CreateProcess, we get a
handle to the process in the PROCESS_INFO output structure. But
instead of using that handle, we were manually looking up a _new_
handle based on the process ID, which is a poor idea, since the
process ID might refer to a new process later on, but the handle
can't.
This lets us avoid sending SIGTERM to something that has already
died, since we realize it has already died, and is a fix for the
unix version of #8746.
Check for consistency between the queued destroy cells and the marked
circuit IDs. Check for consistency in the count of queued destroy
cells in several ways. Check to see whether any of the marked circuit
IDs have somehow been marked longer than the channel has existed.
And add a comment about why conditions that would cause us to drop a
cell should get checked before actions that would cause us to send a
destroy cell.
Spotted by 'cypherpunks'.
And note that these issues have been present since 0.0.8pre1 (commit
0da256ef), where we added a "shutting down" state, and started
responding to all create cells with DESTROY when shutting down.
