It turns out that OpenSSL 0.9.8m is likely to take a completely
different approach for reenabling renegotiation than OpenSSL 0.9.8l
did, so we need to work with both. :p Fixes bug 1158.
(patch by coderman; commit message by nickm)
Avoid crashing if the client is trying to upload many bytes and the
circuit gets torn down at the same time, or if the flip side
happens on the exit relay. Bugfix on 0.2.0.1-alpha; fixes bug 1150.
To fix a major security problem related to incorrect use of
SSL/TLS renegotiation, OpenSSL has turned off renegotiation by
default. We are not affected by this security problem, however,
since we do renegotiation right. (Specifically, we never treat a
renegotiated credential as authenticating previous communication.)
Nevertheless, OpenSSL's new behavior requires us to explicitly
turn renegotiation back on in order to get our protocol working
again.
Amusingly, this is not so simple as "set the flag when you create
the SSL object" , since calling connect or accept seems to clear
the flags.
For belt-and-suspenders purposes, we clear the flag once the Tor
handshake is done. There's no way to exploit a second handshake
either, but we might as well not allow it.
The first happens on an error case when a controller wants an
impossible directory object. The second happens when we can't write
our fingerprint file.
The code for these was super-wrong, but will only break things when we
reset an option on a platform where sizeof(time_t) is different from
sizeof(int).
To further attempt to fix bug 1090, make sure connection_ap_can_use_exit
always returns 0 when the chosen exit router is excluded. This should fix
bug1090.
When we excluded some Exits, we were sometimes warning the user that we
were going to use the node regardless. Many of those warnings were in
fact bogus, because the relay in question was not used to connect to
the outside world.
Based on patch by Rotor, thanks!
Adding the same vote to a networkstatus consensus leads to a memory leak
on the client side. Fix that by only using the first vote from any given
voter, and ignoring the others.
Problem found by Rotor, who also helped writing the patch. Thanks!
Fix an obscure bug where hidden services on 64-bit big-endian
systems might mis-read the timestamp in v3 introduce cells, and
refuse to connect back to the client. Discovered by "rotor".
Bugfix on 0.2.1.6-alpha.
(Given that we're pretty much assuming that int is 32 bits, and given that
hex values are always unsigned, taking out the "ul" from 0xff000000 should
be fine.)
Add a "getinfo status/accepted-server-descriptor" controller
command, which is the recommended way for controllers to learn
whether our server descriptor has been successfully received by at
least on directory authority. Un-recommend good-server-descriptor
getinfo and status events until we have a better design for them.
We were telling the controller about CHECKING_REACHABILITY and
REACHABILITY_FAILED status events whenever we launch a testing
circuit or notice that one has failed. Instead, only tell the
controller when we want to inform the user of overall success or
overall failure. Bugfix on 0.1.2.6-alpha. Fixes bug 1075. Reported
by SwissTorExit.
We were triggering a CLOCK_SKEW controller status event whenever
we connect via the v2 connection protocol to any relay that has
a wrong clock. Instead, we should only inform the controller when
it's a trusted authority that claims our clock is wrong. Bugfix
on 0.2.0.20-rc; starts to fix bug 1074. Reported by SwissTorExit.
Once we had called log_free_all(), anything that tried to log a
message (like a failed tor_assert()) would fail like this:
1. The logging call eventually invokes the _log() function.
2. _log() calls tor_mutex_lock(log_mutex).
3. tor_mutex_lock(m) calls tor_assert(m).
4. Since we freed the log_mutex, tor_assert() fails, and tries to
log its failure.
5. GOTO 1.
Now we allocate the mutex statically, and never destroy it on
shutdown.
Bugfix on 0.2.0.16-alpha, which introduced the log mutex.
This bug was found by Matt Edman.
The more verbose logs that were added in ee58153 also include a string
that might not have been initialized. This can lead to segfaults, e.g.,
when setting up private Tor networks. Initialize this string with NULL.
Send circuit or stream sendme cells when our window has decreased
by 100 cells, not when it has decreased by 101 cells. Bug uncovered
by Karsten when testing the "reduce circuit window" performance
patch. Bugfix on the 54th commit on Tor -- from July 2002,
before the release of Tor 0.0.0. This is the new winner of the
oldest-bug prize.
Relays no longer publish a new server descriptor if they change
their MaxAdvertisedBandwidth config option but it doesn't end up
changing their advertised bandwidth numbers. Bugfix on 0.2.0.28-rc;
fixes bug 1026. Patch from Sebastian.
Specifically, every time we get a create cell but we have so many already
queued that we refuse it.
Bugfix on 0.2.0.19-alpha; fixes bug 1034. Reported by BarkerJr.
The problem is that clients and hidden services are receiving
relay_early cells, and they tear down the circuit.
Hack #1 is for rendezvous points to rewrite relay_early cells to
relay cells. That way there are never any incoming relay_early cells.
Hack #2 is for clients and hidden services to never send a relay_early
cell on an established rendezvous circuit. That works around rendezvous
points that haven't upgraded yet.
Hack #3 is for clients and hidden services to not tear down the circuit
when they receive an inbound relay_early cell. We already refuse extend
cells at clients.
The internal error "could not find intro key" occurs when we want to send
an INTRODUCE1 cell over a recently finished introduction circuit and think
we built the introduction circuit with a v2 hidden service descriptor, but
cannot find the introduction key in our descriptor.
My first guess how we can end up in this situation is that we are wrong in
thinking that we built the introduction circuit based on a v2 hidden
service descriptor. This patch checks if we have a v0 descriptor, too, and
uses that instead.
o Minor features:
- If we're a relay and we change our IP address, be more verbose
about the reason that made us change. Should help track down
further bugs for relays on dynamic IP addresses.
when we write out our stability info, detect relays that have slipped
through the cracks. log about them and correct the problem.
if we continue to see a lot of these over time, it means there's another
spot where relays fall out of the routerlist without being marked as
unreachable.
