With v2 support for HSFETCH gone, we only support v3 addresses. We don't
support v2 descriptor IDs anymore and hence we can remove that code.
The code removed would ensure that if a v2 descriptor ID was provided, the user
also had to provide HSDirs explicitly.
In the v3 case, the code should work even if no HSDirs are provided, and Tor
would find the HSDirs itself.
For a user using "HiddenServiceVersion 2", a log warning is emitted indicating
that v2 is now obsolete instead of a confusing message saying that the version
is not supported.
Also, if an introduction point gets a legacy (v2) ESTABLISH_INTRO, we'll
simply close the circuit without emitting a protocol warning log onto the
relay.
Related to #40266
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
We still keep v2 rendezvous stats since we will allow them until the network
has entirely phased out.
Related to #40266
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This is unfortunately massive but both functionalities were extremely
intertwined and it would have required us to actually change the HSv2 code in
order to be able to split this into multiple commits.
After this commit, there are still artefacts of v2 in the code but there is no
more support for service, intro point and HSDir.
The v2 support for rendezvous circuit is still available since that code is
the same for the v3 and we will leave it in so if a client is able to
rendezvous on v2 then it can still transfer traffic. Once the entire network
has moved away from v2, we can remove v2 rendezvous point support.
Related to #40266
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
It can be called with strings that should have been
length-delimited, but which in fact are not. This can cause a
CPU-DoS bug or, in a worse case, a crash.
Since this function isn't essential, the best solution for older
Tors is to just turn it off.
Fixes bug 40286; bugfix on 0.2.2.1-alpha when dump_desc() was
introduced.
Now that exit relays don't allow exit connections to directory authority
DirPorts, the follow-up step is to make directory authorities stop doing
DirPort reachability checks.
Fixes#40287
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Turns out, we forgot to add the METRICS connection type fo the finished
flushing handler.
Fixes#40295
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
The comment of that specific unit test wanted 4 ORPorts but for some reasons
we tested for 3 which before the previous commit related to #40289, test would
pass but it was in fact wrong.
Now the code is correct and 4 was in fact correct expected number of ports.
Related to #40289
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
We were just looking at the family which is not correct because it is possible
to have two explicit ORPort for the same family but different addresses. One
example is:
ORPort 127.0.0.1:9001 NoAdvertise
ORPort 1.2.3.4:9001 NoListen
Thus, this patch now ignores ports that have different addresses iff they are
both explicits. That is, if we have this example, also two different
addresses:
ORPort 9001
ORPort 127.0.0.1:9001 NoAdvertise
The first one is implicit and second one is explicit and thus we have to
consider them for removal which in this case would remove the "ORPort 9001" in
favor of the second port.
Fixes#40289
Signe-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Fun bug where we thought we were using the default "false" value when an
implicit address was detected but if we had an explicit address before, the
flag was set to true and then we would only use that value.
And thus, for some configurations, implicit addresses would be flagged as
explicit and then configuring ports goes bad.
Related to #40289
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
In other words, if PublishServerDescriptor is set to 0 and AssumeReachable to
1, then allow a relay to hold a RFC1918 address.
Reasons for this are documented in #40208Fixes#40208
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
That comes from 685c4866ac which added that
check correctly except for when we build a descriptor.
We already omit the IPv6 address, if we need to, when we encode the descriptor
but we need to keep the actual discovered address in the descriptor so we can
notice future IP changes and be able to assess that we are not publishable as
long as we don't specifically set the omit flag.
This lead to also having tor noticing that our IP changed from <nothing> (no
IPv6 in the descriptor) to a discovered one which would trigger every minute.
Fixes#40279, #40288
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Handle the EOF situation for a metrics connection. Furthermore, if we failed
to fetch the data from the inbuf properly, mark the socket as closed because
the caller, connection_process_inbuf(), assumes that we did so on error.
Fixes#40257
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Previously we would warn in this case... but there's really no
justification for doing so, and it can only cause confusion.
Fixes bug #40281; bugfix on 0.4.0.1-alpha.
In two instances we must look at this flag:
1. When we build the descriptor so the IPv6 is NOT added to the descriptor in
case we judge that we need to omit the address but still publish.
2. When we are deciding if the descriptor is publishable. This flags tells us
that the IPv6 was not found reachable but we should still publish.
Fixes#40279
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
While trying to resolve our CI issues, the Windows build broke with an
unused function error:
src/test/test_switch_id.c:37:1: error: ‘unprivileged_port_range_start’
defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
We solve this by moving the `#if !defined(_WIN32)` test above the
`unprivileged_port_range_start()` function defintion such that it is
included in its body.
This is an unreviewed commit.
See: tor#40275
We currently assume that the only way for Tor to listen on ports in the
privileged port range (1 to 1023), on Linux, is if we are granted the
NET_BIND_SERVICE capability. Today on Linux, it's possible to specify
the beginning of the unprivileged port range using a sysctl
configuration option. Docker (and thus the CI service Tor uses) recently
changed this sysctl value to 0, which causes our tests to fail as they
assume that we should NOT be able to bind to a privileged port *without*
the NET_BIND_SERVICE capability.
In this patch, we read the value of the sysctl value via the /proc/sys/
filesystem iff it's present, otherwise we assume the default
unprivileged port range begins at port 1024.
See: tor#40275
The TORPROTOCOL reason causes the client to close the circuit which is not
what we want because other valid streams might be on it.
Instead, CONNECTION_REFUSED will leave it open but will not allow more streams
to be attached to it. The client then open a new circuit to the destination.
Closes#40270
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This is to minimize false positive and thus deny reentry to Exit connections
that were in reality not re-entering. Helps with overall UX.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Obey the "allow-network-reentry" consensus parameters in order to decide to
allow it or not at the Exit.
Closes#40268
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
The TORPROTOCOL reason causes the client to close the circuit which is not
what we want because other valid streams might be on it.
Instead, CONNECTION_REFUSED will leave it open but will not allow more streams
to be attached to it. The client then open a new circuit to the destination.
Closes#40270
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This is to minimize false positive and thus deny reentry to Exit connections
that were in reality not re-entering. Helps with overall UX.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Obey the "allow-network-reentry" consensus parameters in order to decide to
allow it or not at the Exit.
Closes#40268
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Exit relays now reject exit attempts to known relay addresses + ORPort and
also to authorities on the ORPort and DirPort.
Closes#2667
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
In order to deny re-entry in the network, we now keep a bloomfilter of relay
ORPort + address and authorities ORPort + address and DirPort + address
combinations.
So when an Exit stream is handled, we deny anything connecting back into the
network on the ORPorts for relays and on the ORPort+DirPort for the
authorities.
Related to #2667
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Exit relays now reject exit attempts to known relay addresses + ORPort and
also to authorities on the ORPort and DirPort.
Closes#2667
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
In order to deny re-entry in the network, we now keep a bloomfilter of relay
ORPort + address and authorities ORPort + address and DirPort + address
combinations.
So when an Exit stream is handled, we deny anything connecting back into the
network on the ORPorts for relays and on the ORPort+DirPort for the
authorities.
Related to #2667
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Everytime we try to discover an address we want to publish, emit a log notice
if we are unable to find it even though an ORPort was configured for it.
Because the function can be called quite often, we rate limit that notice to
every hour so it gets annoying just enough so the operator fixes that.
Related to #40254
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
We would before do an address discovery and then a lookup in the cache if not
found which is now simplified by calling relay_find_addr_to_publish() directly
which does all those combined.
Furthermore, by doing so, we won't trigger an address discovery every minute
if we have no ORPort configured for the family.
Fixes#40254
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Now that relay_find_addr_to_publish() checks if we actually have an ORPort, we
can simplify the descriptor building phase for IPv6.
This also avoid triggering an IPv6 discovery if the IPv4 can't be found in the
first place.
Related to #40254
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
In other words, if we don't have an ORPort configured for a specific family
(IPv4/v6), we don't bother doing address discovery.
Related to #40254
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This is a _subtle_ bug introduced by d1494d14, which resolved
connections that was allocated in the extorport/handshake test. So
how did the connection get freed? Our test was set up so that every
extorport connection would get the same ext_or_id. Two connections
couldn't have the same ext_or_id, and if they did, one would get
freed. This meant that the _next_ connection to be constructed in
the test would cause the previous connection to become closeable,
even if it hadn't been closeable before.
But when we applied d149d14, we stopped making it so our code
enforced this uniqueness, and thereby make it so we _weren't_
freeing this connection in the tests.
Closes#40260; bug not in any released version of Tor.
This step happens after we make each consensus flavor, and before we
worry about sigs or anything. That way if Tor crashes, or if we fail to
get enough sigs, we still have a chance to know what consensus we wanted
to make.
This validation was only done if DisableNetwork was off because we would use
the global list of transports/bridges and DisableNetwork would not populate
it.
This was a problem for any user using DisableNetwork which includes Tor
Browser and thus leading to the Bug() warning.
Without a more in depth refactoring, we can't do this validation without the
global list.
The previous commit makes it that any connection to a bridge without a
transport won't happen thus we keep the security feature of not connecting to
a bridge without its corresponding transport.
Related to #40106
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Don't pick the bridge as the guard or launch descriptor fetch if no transport
is found.
Fixes#40106
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This patch limits the number of items in the consensus diff cache to 64
on the Windows platform. Hopefully, this will allow us to investigate a
smarter fix while avoiding the situation reported in tor#24857 where
Windows relay operators report Tor using 100% CPU.
See: tor#24857
When selecting the first advertised port, we always prefer the one with an
explicit address.
Closes#40246
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
We used to actually discard ORPorts that were the same port and same family
but they could have different address.
Instead, we need to keep all different ORPorts so we can bind a listener on
each of them. We will publish only one of these in our descriptor though.
Related to #40246
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This patch removes a call to `tor_assert_nonfatal()` if
`extend_info_from_node()` returns NULL. This is unnecessary as we
already handle the case where `info` is NULL in the next `if (!info) {
... }` block in the code.
See: tor#32666.
This reverts commit d07f17f676.
We don't want to consider an entire routable IPv6 network as sybil if more
than 2 relays happen to be on it. For path selection it is very important but
not for selecting relays in the consensus.
Fixes#40243
We can end up trying to find our address from an authority while we don't have
yet its descriptor.
In this case, don't BUG() and just come back later.
Closes#40231
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
In case building the descriptor would fail, we could still flag that we did in
fact publish the descriptors leading to no more attempt at publishing it which
in turn makes the relay silent for some hours and not try to rebuild the
descriptor later.
This has been spotted with #40231 because the operator used a localhost
address for the ORPort and "AssumeReachable 1" leading to this code path where
the descriptor failed to build but all conditions to "can I publish" were met.
Related to #40231
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This one should work on GCC _and_ on Clang. The previous version
made Clang happier by not having unreachable "fallthrough"
statements, but made GCC sad because GCC didn't think that the
unconditional failures were really unconditional, and therefore
_wanted_ a FALLTHROUGH.
This patch adds a FALLTHROUGH_UNLESS_ALL_BUGS_ARE_FATAL macro that
seems to please both GCC and Clang in this case: ordinarily it is a
FALLTHROUGH, but when ALL_BUGS_ARE_FATAL is defined, it's an
abort().
Fixes bug 40241 again. Bugfix on earlier fix for 40241, which was
merged into maint-0.3.5 and forward, and released in 0.4.5.3-rc.
Our original code for parsing these parameters out of our list of
parameters pre-dated us having the
dirvote_get_intermediate_param_value() function... and it was buggy.
Specifically, it would reject any " ... K=V ..." value
where there were additional unconverted characters after the V, and
use the default value instead,
We haven't run into this yet because we've never voted for
bwweightscale to be anything besides the default 10000, or
maxunmeasuredbw to be anything besides the default 20.
This requires a new consensus method because it is a change in how
consensuses are computed.
Fixes bug 19011; bugfix on 0.2.2.10-alpha.
Some days before this commit, the network experienced a DDoS on the directory
authorities that prevented them to generate a consensus for more than 5 hours
straight.
That in turn entirely disabled onion service v3, client and service side, due
to the subsystem requiring a live consensus to function properly.
We know require a reasonably live consensus which means that the HSv3
subsystem will to its job for using the best consensus tor can find. If the
entire network is using an old consensus, than this should be alright.
If the service happens to use a live consensus while a client is not, it
should still work because the client will use the current SRV it sees which
might be the previous SRV for the service for which it still publish
descriptors for.
If the service is using an old one and somehow can't get a new one while
clients are on a new one, then reachability issues might arise. However, this
is a situation we already have at the moment since the service will simply not
work if it doesn't have a live consensus while a client has one.
Fixes#40237
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
