The GETINFO extra-info/digest/<digest> broke in commit 568dc27a19 that
refactored the base16_decode() API to return the decoded length.
Unfortunately, that if() condition should have checked for the correct length
instead of an error which broke the command in tor-0.2.9.1-alpha.
Fixes#22034
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
In order to avoid src/or/hs_service.o to contain no symbols and thus making
clang throw a warning, the functions are now exposed not just to unit tests.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
When calculating max sampled size, Tor would only count the number of
bridges in torrc, without considering that our state file might already
have sampled bridges in it. This caused problems when people swap
bridges, since the following error would trigger:
[warn] Not expanding the guard sample any further; just hit the
maximum sample threshold of 1
The bridges+ipv6-min integration test has a client with bridges:
Bridge 127.0.0.1:5003
Bridge [::1]:5003
which got stuck in guard_selection_have_enough_dir_info_to_build_circuits()
because it couldn't find the descriptor of both bridges.
Specifically, the guard_has_descriptor() function could not find the
node_t of the [::1] bridge, because the [::1] bridge had no identity
digest assigned to it.
After further examination, it seems that during fetching the descriptor
for our bridges, we used the CERTS cell to fill the identity digest of
127.0.0.1:5003 properly. However, when we received a CERTS cell from
[::1]:5003 we actually ignored its identity digest because the
learned_router_identity() function was using
get_configured_bridge_by_addr_port_digest() which was returning the
127.0.0.1 bridge instead of the [::1] bridge (because it prioritizes
digest matching over addrport matching).
The fix replaces get_configured_bridge_by_addr_port_digest() with the
recent get_configured_bridge_by_exact_addr_port_digest() function. It
also relaxes the constraints of the
get_configured_bridge_by_exact_addr_port_digest() function by making it
return bridges whose identity digest is not yet known.
By using the _exact_() function, learned_router_identity() actually
fills in the identity digest of the [::1] bridge, which then allows
guard_has_descriptor() to find the right node_t and verify that the
descriptor is there.
FWIW, in the bridges+ipv6-min test both 127.0.0.1 and [::1] bridges
correspond to the same node_t, which I guess makes sense given that it's
actually the same underlying bridge.
Make hidden services with 8 to 10 introduction points check for failed
circuits immediately after startup. Previously, they would wait for 5
minutes before performing their first checks.
Fixes bug 21594; bugfix on commit 190aac0eab in Tor 0.2.3.9-alpha.
Reported by alecmuffett.
This change is the only one necessary to allow future versions of
the microdescriptor consensus to replace every 'published' date with
e.g. 2038-01-01 00:00:00; this will save 50-75% in compressed
microdescriptor diff size, which is quite significant.
This commit is a minimal change for 0.2.9; future series will
reduce the use of the 'published' date even more.
Implements part of ticket 21642; implements part of proposal 275.
Previously, they would stop checking when they exceeded their intro point
creation limit.
Fixes bug 21596; bugfix on commit d67bf8b2f2 in Tor 0.2.7.2-alpha.
Reported by alecmuffett.
In that chutney test, the bridge client is configured to connect to
the same bridge at 127.0.0.1:5003 _and_ at [::1]:5003, with no
change in transports.
That meant, I think, that the descriptor is only assigned to the
first bridge when it arrives, and never the second.
- Make sure we check at least two guards for descriptor before making
circuits. We typically use the first primary guard for circuits, but
it can also happen that we use the second primary guard (e.g. if we
pick our first primary guard as an exit), so we should make sure we
have descriptors for both of them.
- Remove BUG() from the guard_has_descriptor() check since we now know
that this can happen in rare but legitimate situations as well, and we
should just move to the next guard in that case.
Previously I'd made a bad assumption in the implementation of
prop271 in 0.3.0.1-alpha: I'd assumed that there couldn't be two
guards with the same identity. That's true for non-bridges, but in
the bridge case, we allow two bridges to have the same ID if they
have different addr:port combinations -- in order to have the same
bridge ID running multiple PTs.
Fortunately, this assumption wasn't deeply ingrained: we stop
enforcing the "one guard per ID" rule in the bridge case, and
instead enforce "one guard per <id,addr,port>".
We also needed to tweak our implementation of
get_bridge_info_for_guard, since it made the same incorrect
assumption.
Fixes bug 21027; bugfix on 0.3.0.1-alpha.
Teor thinks that this connection_dirserv_add_dir_bytes_to_outbuf()
might be the problem, if the "remaining" calculation underflows. So
I'm adding a couple of checks there, and improving the casts.
When encoding a legacy ESTABLISH_INTRO cell, we were using the sizeof() on a
pointer instead of using the real size of the destination buffer leading to an
overflow passing an enormous value to the signing digest function.
Fortunately, that value was only used to make sure the destination buffer
length was big enough for the key size and in this case it always was because
of the overflow.
Fixes#21553
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Instead of returning 404 error code, this led to a NULL pointer being used and
thus a crash of tor.
Fixes#21471
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Fixes bug 20894; bugfix on 0.2.0.16-alpha.
We already applied a workaround for this as 20834, so no need to
freak out (unless you didn't apply 20384 yet).
This should be "impossible" without making a SHA1 collision, but
let's not keep the assumption that SHA1 collisions are super-hard.
This prevents another case related to 21278. There should be no
behavioral change unless -ftrapv is on.
I think this one probably can't underflow, since the input ranges
are small. But let's not tempt fate.
This patch also replaces the "cmp" functions here with just "eq"
functions, since nothing actually checked for anything besides 0 and
nonzero.
Related to 21278.
Fix for TROVE-2017-001 and bug 21278.
(Note: Instead of handling signed ints "correctly", we keep the old
behavior, except for the part where we would crash with -ftrapv.)
This reverts commit 5446cb8d3d.
The underlying revert was done in 0.2.6, since we aren't backporting
seccomp2 loosening fixes to 0.2.6. But the fix (for 17354) already
went out in 0.2.7.4-rc, so we shouldn't revert it in 0.2.7.
maint-0.2.7-redux is an attempt to try to re-create a plausible
maint-0.2.7 branch. I've started from the tor-0.2.7.6, and then I
merged maint-0.2.6 into the branch.
This has produced 2 conflicts: one related to the
rendcommon->rendcache move, and one to the authority refactoring.
The length of auth_data from an INTRODUCE2 cell is checked when the
auth_type is recognized (1 or 2), but not for any other non-zero
auth_type. Later, auth_data is assumed to have at least
REND_DESC_COOKIE_LEN bytes, leading to a client-triggered out of bounds
read.
Fixed by checking auth_len before comparing the descriptor cookie
against known clients.
Fixes#15823; bugfix on 0.2.1.6-alpha.
Bug 21242 occurred because we asserted that extend_info_from_node()
had succeeded...even though we already had the code to handle such a
failure. We fixed that in 93b39c5162.
But there were four other cases in our code where we called
extend_info_from_node() and either tor_assert()ed that it returned
non-NULL, or [in one case] silently assumed that it returned
non-NULL. That's not such a great idea. This patch makes those
cases check for a bug of this kind instead.
Fixes bug 21372; bugfix on 0.2.3.1-alpha when
extend_info_from_node() was introduced.
Once a second, we go over all services and consider the validity of the intro
points. Now, also try to remove expiring nodes that have no more circuit
associated to them. This is possible if we moved an intro point object
previously to that list and the circuit actually timed out or was closed by
the introduction point itself.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
In rend_service_intro_has_opened(), this is subject to a possible underflow
because of how the if() casts the results. In the case where the expiring
nodes list length is bigger than the number of IP circuits, we end up in the
following situation where the result will be cast to an unsigned int. For
instance, "5 - 6" is actually a BIG number.
Ultimately leading to closing IP circuits in a non stop loop.
Partially fixes#21302.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Previously the dirserv_orconn_tls_done() function would skip routers
when they advertised an ed25519 key but didn't present it during the
link handshake. But that covers all versions between 0.2.7.2-alpha
and 0.2.9.x inclusive!
Fixes bug 21107; bugfix on 0.3.0.1-alpha.
Because we don't allow client functionalities in non anonymous mode,
recommending Tor2web is a bad idea.
If a user wants to use Tor2web as a client (losing all anonymity), it should
run a second tor, not use it with a single onion service tor.
Fixes#21294.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
In rend_consider_services_intro_points(), we had a possible interger underflow
which could lead to creating a very large number of intro points. We had a
safe guard against that *except* if the expiring_nodes list was not empty
which is realistic thing.
This commit removes the check on the expiring nodes length being zero. It's
not because we have an empty list of expiring nodes that we don't want to open
new IPs. Prior to this check, we remove invalid IP nodes from the main list of
a service so it should be the only thing to look at when deciding if we need
to create new IP(s) or not.
Partially fixes#21302.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This disregards anything smaller than an IPv6 /64, and rejects ports that
are rejected on an IPv6 /16 or larger.
Adjust existing unit tests, and add more to cover exceptional cases.
No IPv4 behaviour changes.
Fixes bug 21357
