Unlike the old test, this test no will no longer mess around with
the forbidden internals of any openssl data structures.
Additionally, it verifies several other behaviors of
tor_tls_cert_matches_key() that we had wanted to verify, such as
the possibility of the certificate's key not matching.
Fixes bug 27226; bugfix on 0.2.5.1-alpha.
This allows us to mock our own tor_tls_get_peer_certificate()
function in order to test ..cert_matches_key(), which will in turn
allow us to simplify test_tortls_cert_matches_key() considerably.
Prep work for the fix for 27226.
In 24765, we said that we supported rust stable in CodingStandardsRust.md.
But we left GettingStartedRust.md saying that we support rust nightly.
Closes 27160.
Forward-ports parts of the 0.3.2 travis config on top of the 0.2.9
merge.
Also:
* build rust on clang and gcc, Linux and macOS
* build combinations of non-default options on gcc Linux
* exclude broken builds
* log the rustup version
Part of 24629.
Creating the configure flags once avoids inconsistent flags
between configure and distcheck configure.
Echoing the flags helps developers work out what configure is
doing.
(Backported to 0.2.9 and later as a precaution.)
Fixes 27088 on 0.3.4.1-alpha, adds logging in previous releases.
Build on all compilers:
* default options + hardening
Build on gcc:
* coverage (+ no hardening)
* distcheck
* no hardening
Add some extra logging:
* tail config.log on failure
(config.log is too long for travis to render)
Put the config in a more logical order
* Sort config items in chronological order
* Put related items together
Part of 24629.
If we're building for Windows, we want to use windows threads no
matter what, and we don't want to link a pthread library even if it
is present. Fixes bug 27081; bugfix on 1790dc6760 in 0.1.0.1-rc.
The seccomp rule for the openat syscall checks for the AT_FDCWD
constant. Because this constant is usually a negative value, a
cast to unsigned int is necessary to make sure it does not get
converted to uint64_t used by seccomp.
More info on:
https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/issues/69#issuecomment-273805980
