The GNU C Library (glibc) offers an function which allocates the
necessary memory automatically [0]. When it is available, we use that.
Otherwise we depend upon the `getcwd` function which requires a
preallocated buffer (and its size). This function was used incorrectly
by depending on the initial buffer size being big enough and otherwise
failing to return the current working directory. The proper way of
getting the current working directory requires a loop which doubles the
buffer size if `getcwd` requires it. This code was copied from [1] with
modifications to fit the context.
[0] https://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/hurd/porting/guidelines.html
[1] http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/getcwd.html
This change prevents us from generating corrupt messages when we
are confused about codepage settings, and makes Windows errors
consistent with the rest of our logs.
Fixes bug 22520; bugfix on 0.1.2.8-alpha. Patch from "Vort".
When setting the maximum number of connections allowed by the OS,
always allow some extra file descriptors for other files.
Fixes bug 22797; bugfix on 0.2.0.10-alpha.
A fair number of our mock_impl declarations were messed up so that
even our special AM_ETAGSFLAGS couldn't find them.
This should be a whitespace-only patch.
This patch removes the `tor_fgets()` wrapper around `fgets(3)` since it
is no longer needed. The function was created due to inconsistency
between the returned values of `fgets(3)` on different versions of Unix
when using `fgets(3)` on non-blocking file descriptors, but with the
recent changes in bug #21654 we switch from unbuffered to direct I/O on
non-blocking file descriptors in our utility module.
We continue to use `fgets(3)` directly in the geoip and dirserv module
since this usage is considered safe.
This patch also removes the test-case that was created to detect
differences in the implementation of `fgets(3)` as well as the changes
file since these changes was not included in any releases yet.
See: https://bugs.torproject.org/21654
This patch adds the `tor_fgets()` function to our compatibility layer.
`tor_fgets()` adds an additional check for whether the error-bit have
been enabled for the given file stream, if that is the case and `errno`
is set to `EAGAIN` we make sure that we always return NULL.
Unfortunately `fgets(3)` behaves differently on different versions of
the C library.
See: https://bugs.torproject.org/21416
See: https://bugs.torproject.org/20988
If tor_mmap_file is called with a file which is larger than SIZE_MAX,
only a small part of the file will be memory-mapped due to integer
truncation.
This can only realistically happen on 32 bit architectures with large
file support.
It's not okay to use the same varargs list twice, and apparently
some windows build environments produce code here that would leave
tor_asprintf() broken. Fix for bug 20560; bugfix on 0.2.2.11-alpha
when tor_asprintf() was introduced.
The functions it warns about are:
assert, memcmp, strcat, strcpy, sprintf, malloc, free, realloc,
strdup, strndup, calloc.
Also, fix a few lingering instances of these in the code. Use other
conventions to indicate _intended_ use of assert and
malloc/realloc/etc.
The Autoconf macro AC_USE_SYSTEM_EXTENSIONS defines preprocessor macros
which turn on extensions to C and POSIX. The macro also makes it easier
for developers to use the extensions without needing (or forgetting) to
define them manually.
The macro can be safely used because it was introduced in Autoconf 2.60
and Tor requires Autoconf 2.63 and above.
So, back long ago, XXX012 meant, "before Tor 0.1.2 is released, we
had better revisit this comment and fix it!"
But we have a huge pile of such comments accumulated for a large
number of released versions! Not cool.
So, here's what I tried to do:
* 0.2.9 and 0.2.8 are retained, since those are not yet released.
* XXX+ or XXX++ or XXX++++ or whatever means, "This one looks
quite important!"
* The others, after one-by-one examination, are downgraded to
plain old XXX. Which doesn't mean they aren't a problem -- just
that they cannot possibly be a release-blocking problem.
