If setrlimit() failed, max_out wasn't set in set_max_file_descriptors()
ending in a state where we don't use ULIMIT_BUFFER for things like tor
private key files.
Also fix the set_max_file_descriptors() documentation.
Fixes#16274
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@ev0ke.net>
The control port was using set_max_file_descriptors() with a limit set to 0
to query the number of maximum socket Tor can use. With the recent changes
to that function, a check was introduced to make sure a user can not set a
value below the amount we reserved for non socket.
This commit adds get_max_sockets() that returns the value of max_sockets so
we can stop using that "setter" function to get the current value.
Finally, the dead code is removed that is the code that checked for limit
equal to 0. From now on, set_max_file_descriptors() should never be used
with a limit set to 0 for a valid use case.
Fixes#16697
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@ev0ke.net>
Also, re-enable the #if'd out condition-variable code.
Work queues are going to make us hack on all of this stuff a bit more
closely, so it might not be a terrible idea to make it easier to hack.
Instead, generate new keys, and overwrite the empty key files.
Adds FN_EMPTY to file_status_t and file_status.
Fixes bug 13111.
Related changes due to review of FN_FILE usage:
Stop generating a fresh .old RSA key file when the .old file is missing.
Avoid overwriting .old key files with empty key files.
Skip loading zero-length extra info store, router store, stats, state,
and key files.
Silence clang warnings under --enable-expensive-hardening, including:
+ implicit truncation of 64 bit values to 32 bit;
+ const char assignment to self;
+ tautological compare; and
+ additional parentheses around equality tests. (gcc uses these to
silence assignment, so clang warns when they're present in an
equality test. But we need to use extra parentheses in macros to
isolate them from other code).
This fixes bug 13102 (not on any released Tor) where using the
standard SSIZE_MAX name broke mingw64, and we didn't realize.
I did this with
perl -i -pe 's/SIZE_T_MAX/SIZE_MAX/' src/*/*.[ch] src/*/*/*.[ch]
Previously, we had documented it to return -1 or 0, when in fact
lseek returns -1 or the new position in the file.
This is harmless, since we were only checking for negative values
when we used tor_fd_seekend.
