This patch makes sures that AppVeyor upgrades its Pacman (the package
manager) before installing the Tor dependencies.
See: https://bugs.torproject.org/34384
The files contrib/dist/tor.sh and contrib/dist/suse/tor.sh should not
exist anymore, but when building in same repository for older versions
of Tor, these files may return and not be cleaned up properly. This
commit unignores those files from .gitignore, in order to make it clear
that these files are no longer auto-generated and should be cleaned up.
Make clear that Tor's C code targets C99 standards. This makes it more
explicit what to expect for new code, because guessing from existing
code is not always reliable, especially for code that predates the
change in standard.
Per ticket #32888 this should address logging "the Address torrc
option", "and whether it is an IP address, or a DNS name"; or the
detected "local hostname", "and whether it is an IP address, or a DNS
name". Some of these details already seem to be logged, so just add
what's missing.
Resume being willing to use preemptively-built circuits when
UseEntryGuards is set to 0. We accidentally disabled this feature with
that config setting (in our fix for #24469), leading to slower load times.
Fixes bug 34303; bugfix on 0.3.3.2-alpha.
Add an inline helper function that indicates if the cached object contains a
decrypted descriptor or not.
The descriptor object is NULL if tor is unable to decrypt it (lacking client
authorization) and some actions need to be done only when we have a decrypted
object.
This improves code semantic.
Fixes#33458
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
The warning was:
11:23:10 ../tor/src/feature/hs/hs_service.c: In function 'log_cant_upload_desc':
11:23:10 ../tor/src/feature/hs/hs_service.c:3118:3: error: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Werror=type-limits]
See #34254 for more info.
I guess this means that gcc assigned an unsigned type to the
`log_desc_upload_reason_t` enum and it warned if we compared it against 0...
For now I think it's simpler to remove that check instead of turning the enum
to a signed type, or trying to hack it some other way.
From what it seems, enum is up to the compiler on whether it's signed/unsigned:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/159034/are-c-enums-signed-or-unsigned
