We previously used this function instead of SSL_set_cipher_list() to
set up a stack of client SSL_CIPHERs for these reasons:
A) In order to force a particular order of the results.
B) In order to be able to include dummy entries for ciphers that
this build of openssl did not support, so we could impersonate
Firefox harder.
But we no longer do B, since we merged proposal 198 and stopped
lying about what ciphers we know.
And A was actually pointless, since I had misread the implementation
of SSL_set_cipher_list(). It _does_ do some internal sorting, but
that is pre-sorting on the master list of ciphers, not sorting on
the user's preferred order.
The key here is to never touch ssl->cipher_list directly, but only
via SSL_get_ciphers(). But it's not so simple.
See, if there is no specialized cipher_list on the SSL object,
SSL_get_ciphers returns the cipher_list on the SSL_CTX. But we sure
don't want to modify that one! So we need to use
SSL_set_cipher_list first to make sure that we really have a cipher
list on the SSL object.
This field was only needed to work with the now-long-gone (I hope,
except for some horrible apples) openssl 0.9.8l; if your headers say
you have openssl 1.1, you won't even need it.
OpenSSL 1.1.0 must be built with "enable-deprecated", and compiled with
`OPENSSL_USE_DEPRECATED` for this to work, so instead, use the newer
routine as appropriate.
The length of auth_data from an INTRODUCE2 cell is checked when the
auth_type is recognized (1 or 2), but not for any other non-zero
auth_type. Later, auth_data is assumed to have at least
REND_DESC_COOKIE_LEN bytes, leading to a client-triggered out of bounds
read.
Fixed by checking auth_len before comparing the descriptor cookie
against known clients.
Fixes#15823; bugfix on 0.2.1.6-alpha.
Fixes#15850, part of #15801. Change file is added by this commit. The
original comment in the reverted commit is removed because right now we
*need* a DirPort until #15849 is implemented so no doubt nor confusion there
anymore.
This reverts commit 80bed1ac96.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@ev0ke.net>
The compiler is allowed to assume that a "uint64_t *" is aligned
correctly, and will inline a version of memcpy that acts as such.
Use "uint8_t *", so the compiler does the right thing.