This patch removes an overly strict tor_assert() and an ignorable BUG()
expression. Both of these would trigger if a PT was unable to configure
itself during startup. The easy way to trigger this is to configure an
obfs4 bridge where you make the obfs4 process try to bind on a port
number under 1024.
See: https://bugs.torproject.org/31091
Found by coverity CID 1454769.
There were a second possible leak that is also fixed in this commit.
Fixes#32063
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
When considering introduction point of a service's descriptor, do not remove
an intro point that has an established or pending circuit.
Fixes#31652
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
When encoding introduction points, we were not checking if that intro points
had an established circuit.
When botting up, the service will pick, by default, 3 + 2 intro points and the
first 3 that establish, we use them and upload the descriptor.
However, the intro point is removed from the service descriptor list only when
the circuit has opened and we see that we have already enough intro points, it
is then removed.
But it is possible that the service establishes 3 intro points successfully
before the other(s) have even opened yet.
This lead to the service encoding extra intro points in the descriptor even
though the circuit is not opened or might never establish (#31561).
Fixes#31548
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Our minimum version is now 0.2.9.5-alpha. Series 0.3.0, 0.3.1,
0.3.2, 0.3.3, and 0.3.4 are now rejected.
Also, extract this version-checking code into a new function, so we
can test it.
Closes ticket 31549.
Also reject 0.3.5.0 through 0.3.5.6-rc as unstable.
There is a bad design choice in two of our configuration types,
where the empty string encodes a value that is not the same as the
default value. This design choice, plus an implementation mistake,
meant that config_dup() did not preserve the value of routerset_t,
and thereby caused bug #31495.
This comment-only patch documents the two types with the problem,
and suggests that implementors try to avoid it in the future.
Closes ticket 31907.
