If "1" is not 64 bits wide already, then "1 << i" will not actually
work.
This bug only affects the TEST_BITOPS code, and shouldn't matter for
the actual use of the timeout code (except if/when it causes this
test to fail).
Reported by dcb314@hotmail.com. Fix for bug 23583. Not adding a
changes file, since this code is never compiled into Tor.
- HT_FOREACH_FN defined in an additional place because nickm did that
in an old kist prototype
- Make channel_more_to_flush mockable for future sched tests
- Add empty scheduler_{vanilla,kist}.c files and put in include.am
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
We used to do:
h = H(BLIND_STRING | H(A | s | B | N )
when we should be doing:
h = H(BLIND_STRING | A | s | B | N)
Change the logic so that hs_common.c does the hashing, and our ed25519
libraries just receive the hashed parameter ready-made. That's easier
than doing the hashing on the ed25519 libraries, since that means we
would have to pass them a variable-length param (depending on whether
's' is set or not).
Also fix the ed25519 test vectors since they were also double hashing.
This adds a couple of configure commands to control whether we're
requiring all dependencies to be available locally (default) or not
(--enable-cargo-online-mode). When building from a tarball, we require
the RUST_DEPENDENCIES variable to point to the local repository of
crates. This also adds src/ext/rust as a git submodule that contains
such a local repository for easy setup.
One of the goals of this change is to have trunnel API/ABI being more explicit
so we namespace them with "trn_*". Furthermore, we can now create
hs_cells.[ch] without having to confuse it with trunnel which used to be
"hs_cell_*" before that change.
Here are the perl line that were used for this rename:
perl -i -pe 's/cell_extension/trn_cell_extension/g;' src/*/*.[ch]
perl -i -pe 's/cell_extension/trn_cell_extension/g;' src/trunnel/hs/*.trunnel
perl -i -pe 's/hs_cell_/trn_cell_/g;' src/*/*.[ch]
perl -i -pe 's/hs_cell_/trn_cell_/g;' src/trunnel/hs/*.trunnel
And then "./scripts/codegen/run_trunnel.sh" with trunnel commit id
613fb1b98e58504e2b84ef56b1602b6380629043.
Fixes#21919
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
The 64-bit load and store code was generating pretty bad output with
my compiler, so I extracted the code from csiphash and used that instead.
Close ticket 21737
Only some very ancient distributions don't ship with Libevent 2 anymore,
even the oldest supported Ubuntu LTS version has it. This allows us to
get rid of a lot of compat code.
The Autoconf macro AC_USE_SYSTEM_EXTENSIONS defines preprocessor macros
which turn on extensions to C and POSIX. The macro also makes it easier
for developers to use the extensions without needing (or forgetting) to
define them manually.
The macro can be safely used because it was introduced in Autoconf 2.60
and Tor requires Autoconf 2.63 and above.
This is a big-ish patch, but it's very straightforward. Under this
clang warning, we're not actually allowed to have a global variable
without a previous extern declaration for it. The cases where we
violated this rule fall into three roughly equal groups:
* Stuff that should have been static.
* Stuff that was global but where the extern was local to some
other C file.
* Stuff that was only global when built for the unit tests, that
needed a conditional extern in the headers.
The first two were IMO genuine problems; the last is a wart of how
we build tests.
This warning, IIUC, means that the compiler doesn't like it when it
sees a NULL check _after_ we've already dereferenced the
variable. In such cases, it considers itself free to eliminate the
NULL check.
There are a couple of tricky cases:
One was the case related to the fact that tor_addr_to_in6() can
return NULL if it gets a non-AF_INET6 address. The fix was to
create a variant which asserts on the address type, and never
returns NULL.
So, back long ago, XXX012 meant, "before Tor 0.1.2 is released, we
had better revisit this comment and fix it!"
But we have a huge pile of such comments accumulated for a large
number of released versions! Not cool.
So, here's what I tried to do:
* 0.2.9 and 0.2.8 are retained, since those are not yet released.
* XXX+ or XXX++ or XXX++++ or whatever means, "This one looks
quite important!"
* The others, after one-by-one examination, are downgraded to
plain old XXX. Which doesn't mean they aren't a problem -- just
that they cannot possibly be a release-blocking problem.
