Commit Graph

18 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nick Mathewson
d5e4a63436 Fix some compilation warnings 2015-05-18 15:57:21 -04:00
David Goulet
a324d7e8e1 Test: add unit test for rend_data_t object and functions
Closes #16021

Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@ev0ke.net>
2015-05-14 12:08:54 -04:00
David Goulet
acfa374048 Test: fix HS_DESC to expect descriptor ID
With #15881 implemented, this adds the missing descriptor ID at the end of
the expected control message.

Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@ev0ke.net>
2015-05-14 10:46:38 -04:00
David Goulet
c1ffeadff4 Add missing descriptor ID to HS_DESC control event
For FAILED and RECEIVED action of the HS_DESC event, we now sends back the
descriptor ID at the end like specified in the control-spec section 4.1.25.

Fixes #15881

Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@ev0ke.net>
2015-05-14 10:46:38 -04:00
David Goulet
dd07c78524 Test: fix HSFETCH control command with latest change
The expected message of the command now expects "650+" and "650 OK".

Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@ev0ke.net>
2015-04-21 14:22:54 -04:00
David Goulet
28cf9f2186 Control: unbolt rend_data from HS desc event
The HS_DESC event was using rend_data_t from the dir connection to reply the
onion address and authentication type. With the new HSFETCH command, it's
now possible to fetch a descriptor only using the descriptor id thus
resulting in not having an onion address in any HS_DESC event.

This patch removes rend_query from the hs desc control functions and replace
it by an onion address string and an auth type.

On a successful fetch, the service id is taken from the fetched descriptor.
For that, an extra parameter is added to "store as a client" function that
contains the cache entry stored.

This will make the control event functions scale more easily over time if
other values not present in rend_data_t are needed since the rend_data from
the dir connection might not contained everything we need.

Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@ev0ke.net>
2015-04-21 14:22:54 -04:00
David Goulet
7db58445fd Control: add HS_DESC_CONTENT event
As defined in section 4.1.26 in the control-spec.txt, this new event replies
the content of a successfully fetched HS descriptor. This also adds a unit
test for the controller event.

Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@ev0ke.net>
2015-04-21 14:15:02 -04:00
Nick Mathewson
6cdb213b6c Combine test_helpers.[ch] and testhelper.[ch] 2015-02-18 09:19:38 -05:00
Nick Mathewson
caf28519d9 Merge branch 'bug12844'
Conflicts:
	src/or/circuituse.c
	src/test/include.am
	src/test/test_entrynodes.c
2015-02-11 15:06:04 -05:00
Nick Mathewson
f54e54b0b4 Bump copyright dates to 2015, in case someday this matters. 2015-01-02 14:27:39 -05:00
rl1987
0db96d023b Adding REASON field to HS_DESC FAILED controller event. 2014-11-16 15:51:23 +02:00
Nick Mathewson
a3dafd3f58 Replace operators used as macro arguments with OP_XX macros
Part of fix for 13172
2014-11-12 13:28:07 -05:00
Nick Mathewson
fcdcb377a4 Add another year to our copyright dates.
Because in 95 years, we or our successors will surely care about
enforcing the BSD license terms on this code.  Right?
2014-10-28 15:30:16 -04:00
Nick Mathewson
0243895792 Use coccinelle scripts to clean up our unit tests
This should get rid of most of the users of the old test_*
functions.  Some are in macros and will need manual cleanup, though.

This patch is for 13119, and was automatically generated with these
scripts.  The perl scripts are there because coccinelle hates
operators as macro arguments.

------------------------------

s/==,/_X_EQ_,/g;
s/!=,/_X_NE_,/g;
s/<,/_X_LT_,/g;
s/>,/_X_GT_,/g;
s/>=,/_X_GEQ_,/g;
s/<=,/_X_LEQ_,/g;

------------------------------
@@
expression a;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-test_fail_msg
+TT_DIE
 (
+(
 a
+)
 )
 ...>
 }

@@
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-test_fail()
+TT_DIE(("Assertion failed."))
 ...>
 }

@@
expression a;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-test_assert
+tt_assert
	(a)
 ...>
 }

@@
expression a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-test_eq
+tt_int_op
 (a,
+_X_EQ_,
  b)
 ...>
 }

@@
expression a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-test_neq
+tt_int_op
 (a,
+_X_NEQ_,
  b)
 ...>
 }

@@
expression a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-test_streq
+tt_str_op
 (a,
+_X_EQ_,
  b)
 ...>
 }

@@
expression a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-test_strneq
+tt_str_op
 (a,
+_X_NEQ_,
  b)
 ...>
 }

@@
expression a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-test_eq_ptr
+tt_ptr_op
 (a,
+_X_EQ_,
  b)
 ...>
 }

@@
expression a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func() {
<...
-test_neq_ptr
+tt_ptr_op
 (a,
+_X_NEQ_,
  b)
 ...>
 }

@@
expression a, b, len;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-test_memeq
+tt_mem_op
 (a,
+_X_EQ_,
  b, len)
 ...>
 }

@@
expression a, b, len;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-test_memneq
+tt_mem_op
 (a,
+_X_NEQ_,
  b, len)
 ...>
 }

------------------------------
@@
char a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a == b
+a, _X_EQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
int a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a == b
+a, _X_EQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
long a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a == b
+a, _X_EQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
unsigned int a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_uint_op
 (
-a == b
+a, _X_EQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
unsigned long a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_uint_op
 (
-a == b
+a, _X_EQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
char a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a != b
+a, _X_NEQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
int a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a != b
+a, _X_NEQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
long a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a != b
+a, _X_NEQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
unsigned int a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_uint_op
 (
-a != b
+a, _X_NEQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
unsigned long a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_uint_op
 (
-a != b
+a, _X_NEQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
char a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a >= b
+a, _X_GEQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
int a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a >= b
+a, _X_GEQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
long a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a >= b
+a, _X_GEQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
unsigned int a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_uint_op
 (
-a >= b
+a, _X_GEQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
unsigned long a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_uint_op
 (
-a >= b
+a, _X_GEQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
char a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a <= b
+a, _X_LEQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
int a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a <= b
+a, _X_LEQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
long a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a <= b
+a, _X_LEQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
unsigned int a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_uint_op
 (
-a <= b
+a, _X_LEQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
unsigned long a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_uint_op
 (
-a <= b
+a, _X_LEQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
char a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a > b
+a, _X_GT_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
int a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a > b
+a, _X_GT_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
long a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a > b
+a, _X_GT_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
unsigned int a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_uint_op
 (
-a > b
+a, _X_GT_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
unsigned long a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_uint_op
 (
-a > b
+a, _X_GT_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
char a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a < b
+a, _X_LT_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
int a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a < b
+a, _X_LT_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
long a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a < b
+a, _X_LT_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
unsigned int a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_uint_op
 (
-a < b
+a, _X_LT_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
unsigned long a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_uint_op
 (
-a < b
+a, _X_LT_, b
 )
 ...>
}

------------------------------

s/_X_NEQ_/!=/g;
s/_X_NE_/!=/g;
s/_X_EQ_/==/g;
s/_X_GT_/>/g;
s/_X_LT_/</g;
s/_X_GEQ_/>=/g;
s/_X_LEQ_/<=/g;

s/test_mem_op\(/tt_mem_op\(/g;
2014-09-15 21:18:21 -04:00
George Kadianakis
bc80b0a50c Write some unittests for Tor2webRendezvousPoints. 2014-09-15 16:07:48 +03:00
Qingping Hou
bf66ff915a fix longname returned in HS_DESC control events
According to control spec, longname should not contain any spaces and is
consists only of identy_digest + nickname

added two functions:
* node_get_verbose_nickname_by_id()
* node_describe_longname_by_id()
2014-02-06 16:13:55 -05:00
Nick Mathewson
24544a10c0 Clean up test_hs.c: warning fix; tor_free() usage.
My OSX laptop rightly gave a warning because of sticking strlen() into
an int, but once I took a closer look... it appears that the strlen()
was part of a needlessly verbose implementation for tor_strdup().

While I was there, I fixed the usage of tor_free() in test_hs.c: It
checks for NULL, and it zeros its argument.  So instead of
    if (foo) {
      tor_free(foo);
      foo = NULL;
    }
we should just say
    tor_free(foo);
2014-02-03 16:12:30 -05:00
Qingping Hou
0b0d4b4ebc add test case for hidden service async events 2014-01-29 22:43:11 -05:00