one guard from a given relay family. Otherwise we could end up with
all of our entry points into the network run by the same operator.
Suggested by Camilo Viecco. Fix on 0.1.1.11-alpha.
Not a backport candidate, since I think this might break for users
who only have a given /16 in their reachableaddresses, or something
like that.
svn:r17514
we were complaining about no support for our one-hop streams,
when in fact choose_good_exit_server_general() has no business
caring about one-hop streams. patch from miner.
svn:r17181
If not enough of our entry guards are available so we add a new
one, we might use the new one even if it overlapped with the
current circuit's exit relay (or its family). Anonymity bugfix
pointed out by rovv.
svn:r16698
Initial conversion of uint32_t addr to tor_addr_t addr in connection_t and related types. Most of the Tor wire formats using these new types are in, but the code to generate and use it is not. This is a big patch. Let me know what it breaks for you.
svn:r16435
Move n_addr, n_port, and n_conn_id_digest fields of circuit_t into a separately allocated extend_info_t. Saves 22 bytes per connected circuit_t on 32-bit platforms, and makes me more comfortable with using tor_addr_t in place of uint32_t n_addr.
svn:r16257
Refactor the router_choose_random_node interface: any function with 10 parameters, most of which are boolean and one of which is unused, should get refactored like this.
svn:r16167
Patch from Christian Wilms: remove (HiddenService|Rend)(Exclude)?Nodes options. They never worked properly, and nobody seems to be using them. Resolves bug 754.
svn:r16144
Never allow a circuit to be created with the same circid as a circuit that has been marked for close. May be a fix for bug 779. Needs testing. Backport candidate.
svn:r16136
Add new ExcludeExitNodes option. Also add a new routerset type to handle Exclude[Exit]Nodes. It is optimized for O(1) membership tests, so as to make choosing a random router run in O(N_routers) time instead of in O(N_routers*N_Excluded_Routers).
svn:r16061
to just our our entry guards for the test circuits. Otherwise we
tend to have multiple test circuits going through a single entry
guard, which makes our bandwidth test less accurate. Fixes part
of bug 654; patch contributed by Josh Albrecht.
(Actually, modify Josh's patch to avoid doing that when you're
a bridge relay, since it would leak more than we want to leak.)
svn:r15850
as soon as you run out of working bridges, rather than waiting
for ten failures -- which will never happen if you have less than
ten bridges.
svn:r15368
If you have more than one bridge but don't know their keys,
you would only learn a request for the descriptor of the first one
on your list. (Tor considered launching requests for the others, but
found that it already had a connection on the way for $0000...0000
so it didn't open another.)
If you have more than one bridge but don't know their keys, and the
connection to one of the bridges failed, you would cancel all
pending bridge connections. (After all, they all have the same
digest.)
svn:r15366
Only dump all guard node status to the log when the guard node status actually changes. Downgrade the 4 most common remaining INFO log messages to DEBUG.
svn:r14069
Add a bunch more code documentation; change the interface of fetch_var_cell_from_buf() so it takes the current link protocol into account and can't get confused by weird command bytes on v1 connections.
svn:r13430
Initial attempts to track down bug 600, and refactor possibly offending code. 1) complain early if circuit state is set to OPEN when an onionskin is pending. 2) refactor onionskin field into one only used when n_conn is pending, and a separate onionskin field waiting for attention by a cpuworker. This might even fix the bug. More likely, it will make it fail with a more useful core.
svn:r13394
When we load a bridge descriptor from the cache,
and it was previously unreachable, mark it as retriable so we won't
just ignore it. Also, try fetching a new copy immediately.
svn:r12950
