This is not actually a bug! It can happen for a bunch of reasons,
which all boil down to "trying to add an extrainfo for which we no
longer have the corresponding routerinfo".
Fixes#16016; bugfix on 0.2.6.3-alpha.
Resume being willing to use preemptively-built circuits when
UseEntryGuards is set to 0. We accidentally disabled this feature with
that config setting (in our fix for #24469), leading to slower load times.
Fixes bug 34303; bugfix on 0.3.3.2-alpha.
GCC added an implicit-fallthrough warning a while back, where it
would complain if you had a nontrivial "case:" block that didn't end
with break, return, or something like that. Clang recently added
the same thing.
GCC, however, would let you annotate a fall-through as intended by
any of various magic "/* fall through */" comments. Clang, however,
only seems to like "__attribute__((fallthrough))". Fortunately, GCC
accepts that too.
A previous commit in this branch defined a FALLTHROUGH macro to do
the right thing if GNUC is defined; here we replace all of our "fall
through" comments with uses of that macro.
This is an automated commit, made with the following perl one-liner:
#!/usr/bin/perl -i -p
s#/\* *falls? ?thr.*?\*/#FALLTHROUGH;#i;
(In order to avoid conflicts, I'm applying this script separately to
each maint branch. This is the 0.4.2 version.)
GCC added an implicit-fallthrough warning a while back, where it
would complain if you had a nontrivial "case:" block that didn't end
with break, return, or something like that. Clang recently added
the same thing.
GCC, however, would let you annotate a fall-through as intended by
any of various magic "/* fall through */" comments. Clang, however,
only seems to like "__attribute__((fallthrough))". Fortunately, GCC
accepts that too.
A previous commit in this branch defined a FALLTHROUGH macro to do
the right thing if GNUC is defined; here we replace all of our "fall
through" comments with uses of that macro.
This is an automated commit, made with the following perl one-liner:
#!/usr/bin/perl -i -p
s#/\* *falls? ?thr.*?\*/#FALLTHROUGH;#i;
(In order to avoid conflicts, I'm applying this script separately to
each maint branch. This is the 0.4.1 version.)
GCC added an implicit-fallthrough warning a while back, where it
would complain if you had a nontrivial "case:" block that didn't end
with break, return, or something like that. Clang recently added
the same thing.
GCC, however, would let you annotate a fall-through as intended by
any of various magic "/* fall through */" comments. Clang, however,
only seems to like "__attribute__((fallthrough))". Fortunately, GCC
accepts that too.
A previous commit in this branch defined a FALLTHROUGH macro to do
the right thing if GNUC is defined; here we replace all of our "fall
through" comments with uses of that macro.
This is an automated commit, made with the following perl one-liner:
#!/usr/bin/perl -i -p
s#/\* *falls? ?thr.*?\*/#FALLTHROUGH;#i;
Given that ed25519 public key validity checks are usually not needed
and (so far) they are only necessary for onion addesses in the Tor
protocol, we decided to fix this specific bug instance without
modifying the rest of the codebase (see below for other fix
approaches).
In our minimal fix we check that the pubkey in
hs_service_add_ephemeral() is valid and error out otherwise.
This patch ensures that we always lowercase the BridgeDistribution from
torrc in descriptors before submitting it.
See: https://bugs.torproject.org/32753
The configured, within the torrc or hardcoded, directory authorities addresses
are now added to the nodelist address set.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
We separate v4 and v6 because we often use an IPv4 address represented with
a uint32_t instead of a tor_addr_t.
This will be used to also add the trusted directory addresses taken from the
configuration.
The trusted directories from the consensus are already added to the address
set from their descriptor.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
That function is only used to test the global bucket write limit for a
directory connection.
It should _not_ be used for anything else since that function looks to see if
we are a directory authority.
Rename it to something more meaningful. No change in behavior at this commit,
only renaming.
Part of #33029
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
When we added the ACTIVE and DORMANT virtual signals, we taught the
signal command to handle them, but we didn't teach SIGNAL event to
report them.
To solve this problem and prevent it from recurring, this patch
revises the implementation of control_event_signal() to use the same
signal_table that handle_control_signal() uses. This way, the two
controller commands can't become out of sync.
Fixes bug 33104; bugfix on 0.4.0.1-alpha.
