Update the definition of the private exit policy in the man page
and torrcs. It didn't get merged correctly into the man page, and
it was incomplete in the torrcs. (Unfortunately, we only reject the
primary configured IPv4 and IPv6 addresses, not all configured IPv4
and IPv6 addresses.)
Also fixup msn page formatting errors from changes in tickets 16069
and 17027, mainly unescaped *s.
Advise users how to configure separate IPv4 and IPv6 exit
policies in the manpage and sample torrcs.
Related to fixes in ticket #16069 and #17027. Patch by "teor".
Patch on 2eb7eafc9d and a96c0affcb (25 Oct 2012),
released in 0.2.4.7-alpha.
src/test/test_policy.c:
Merged calls to policies_parse_exit_policy by adding additional arguments.
fixup to remaining instance of ~EXIT_POLICY_IPV6_ENABLED.
Compacting logic test now produces previous list length of 4, corrected this.
src/config/torrc.sample.in:
src/config/torrc.minimal.in-staging:
Merged torrc modification dates in favour of latest.
ExitPolicyRejectPrivate now rejects more local addresses by default:
* the relay's published IPv6 address (if any), and
* any publicly routable IPv4 or IPv6 addresses on any local interfaces.
This resolves a security issue for IPv6 Exits and multihomed Exits that
trust connections originating from localhost.
Resolves ticket 17027. Patch by "teor".
Patch on 42b8fb5a15 (11 Nov 2007), released in 0.2.0.11-alpha.
In previous versions of Tor, ExitPolicy accept6/reject6 * produced
policy entries for IPv4 and IPv6 wildcard addresses.
To reduce operator confusion, change accept6/reject6 * to only produce
an IPv6 wildcard address.
Resolves bug #16069.
Patch on 2eb7eafc9d and a96c0affcb (25 Oct 2012),
released in 0.2.4.7-alpha.
torrc.minimal is now the one that should change as infrequently as
possible. To schedule an change to go into it eventually, make your
change to torrc.minimal.in-sample.
torrc.sample is now the volatile one: we can change it to our hearts'
content.
Closes ticket #11144
See 1d2179bc90 in master for details.
"""
Fall back to registered country if necessary.
When extracting geoip and geoip6 files from MaxMind's GeoLite2 Country
database, we only look at country->iso_code which is the two-character ISO
3166-1 country code of the country where MaxMind believes the end user is
located.
But if MaxMind thinks a range belongs to anonymous proxies, they don't put
anything there. Hence, we omit those ranges and resolve them all to '??'.
That's not what we want.
What we should do is first try country->iso_code, and if there's no such
key, try registered_country->iso_code which is the country in which the
ISP has registered the IP address.
In short: let's fill all A1 entries with what ARIN et. al think.
"""
When extracting geoip and geoip6 files from MaxMind's GeoLite2 Country
database, we only look at country->iso_code which is the two-character ISO
3166-1 country code of the country where MaxMind believes the end user is
located.
But if MaxMind thinks a range belongs to anonymous proxies, they don't put
anything there. Hence, we omit those ranges and resolve them all to '??'.
That's not what we want.
What we should do is first try country->iso_code, and if there's no such
key, try registered_country->iso_code which is the country in which the
ISP has registered the IP address.
In short: let's fill all A1 entries with what ARIN et. al think.
If the cert turns out to be invalid or if wget is otherwise unable to
verify it, it's going to return an error and not download the file for us.
Spotted by nickm.
The latest GeoLite2 database includes a pointer from 2001::/32 to the root
node of the IPv4 address space in the tree. We need to exclude this whole
address space from geoip6, similar to how we exclude IPv4-mapped IPv6
addresses and the 6to4 mapping subnet.
This reverts the torrc.sample.in changes from commit
66a04a6ac3.
We're going to not make this change in 0.2.4, since changing
torrc.sample.in makes all the debian users do some pointless
busywork. see tor-dev discusion of 9 Oct 2013.
Explicitly include bridges, and note that we archive and publish all
descriptors.
(We are not yet publishing ContactInfo lines contained in bridge
descriptors, but maybe we'll want to do that soon, so let's err on the
side of caution here.)
Related to #9854.
