malloc_options needs to be declared extern (and declaring it extern
means we need to initialize it separately)
Fixes bug 29145; bugfix on 0.2.9.3-alpha
Signed-off-by: Kris Katterjohn <katterjohn@gmail.com>
Prior to this commit, the testsuite was failing on OpenBSD. After
this commit the testsuite runs fine on OpenBSD.
It was previously decided to test for the OpenBSD macro (rather than
__OpenBSD__, etc.) because OpenBSD forks seem to have the former
macro defined. sys/param.h must be included for the OpenBSD macro
definition; however, many files tested for the OpenBSD macro without
having this header included.
This commit includes sys/param.h in the files where the OpenBSD macro
is used (and sys/param.h is not already included), and it also
changes some instances of the __OpenBSD__ macro to OpenBSD.
See commit 27df23abb6 which changed
everything to use OpenBSD instead of __OpenBSD__ or OPENBSD. See
also tickets #6982 and #20980 (the latter ticket is where it was
decided to use the OpenBSD macro).
Signed-off-by: Kris Katterjohn <katterjohn@gmail.com>
* ADD new /src/common/crypto_rand.[ch] module.
* ADD new /src/common/crypto_util.[ch] module (contains the memwipe()
function, since all crypto_* modules need this).
* FIXES part of #24658: https://bugs.torproject.org/24658
The functions it warns about are:
assert, memcmp, strcat, strcpy, sprintf, malloc, free, realloc,
strdup, strndup, calloc.
Also, fix a few lingering instances of these in the code. Use other
conventions to indicate _intended_ use of assert and
malloc/realloc/etc.
This is a big-ish patch, but it's very straightforward. Under this
clang warning, we're not actually allowed to have a global variable
without a previous extern declaration for it. The cases where we
violated this rule fall into three roughly equal groups:
* Stuff that should have been static.
* Stuff that was global but where the extern was local to some
other C file.
* Stuff that was only global when built for the unit tests, that
needed a conditional extern in the headers.
The first two were IMO genuine problems; the last is a wart of how
we build tests.
Apparently somewhere along the line we decided that MIN might be
missing.
But we already defined it (if it was missing) in compat.h, which
everybody includes.
Closes ticket 18889.
It invokes undefined behavior, I'm afraid, since there's no other
c-legal way to test whether memwipe() works when we're not allowed to
look at it.
Closes ticket 15377.
