Conflicts:
src/or/connection.c
src/or/connection_edge.c
src/or/connection_edge.h
src/or/dnsserv.c
Some of these were a little tricky, since they touched code that
changed because of the prop171 fixes.
Now we track *which* stream with ISO_STREAM set is associated to a
particular circuit, so that we won't think that stream is incompatible
with its circuit and launch another one a second later, and we use that
same field to mark circuits which have had an ISO_STREAM stream attached
to them, so that we won't ever put a second stream on that circuit.
Fixes bug 3695.
They *are* non-NUL-terminated, after all (and they have to be, since
the SOCKS5 spec allows them to contain embedded NULs. But the code
to implement proposal 171 was copying them with tor_strdup and
comparing them with strcmp_opt.
Fix for bug on 3683; bug not present in any yet-released version.
Previously we'd just looked at the connection type, but that's
always CONN_TYPE_AP. Instead, we should be looking at the type of
the listener that created the connection.
Spotted by rransom; fixes bug 3636.
The conflicts are with the proposal 171 circuit isolation code, and
they're all trivial: they're just a matter of both branches adding
some unrelated code in the same places.
Conflicts:
src/or/circuituse.c
src/or/connection.c
One-hop dirconn streams all share a session group, and get the
ISO_SESSIONGRP flag: they may share circuits with each other and
nothing else.
Anonymized dirconn streams get a new internal-use-only ISO_STREAM
flag: they may not share circuits with anything, including each other.
The new candidate rule, which arma suggested and I like, is that
the original address as received from the client connection or as
rewritten by the controller is the address that counts.
This is mainly meant as a way to keep clients from accidentally
DOSing themselves by (e.g.) enabling IsolateDestAddr or
IsolateDestPort on a port that they use for HTTP.
Our old "do we need to launch a circuit for stream S" logic was,
more or less, that if we had a pending circuit that could handle S,
we didn't need to launch a new one.
But now that we have streams isolated from one another, we need
something stronger here: It's possible that some pending C can
handle either S1 or S2, but not both.
This patch reuses the existing isolation logic for a simple
solution: when we decide during circuit launching that some pending
C would satisfy stream S1, we "hypothetically" mark C as though S1
had been connected to it. Now if S2 is incompatible with S1, it
won't be something that can attach to C, and so we'll launch a new
stream.
When the circuit becomes OPEN for the first time (with no streams
attached to it), we reset the circuit's isolation status. I'm not
too sure about this part: I wanted some way to be sure that, if all
streams that would have used a circuit die before the circuit is
done, the circuit can still get used. But I worry that this
approach could also lead to us launching too many circuits. Careful
thought needed here.
The "nym epoch" of a stream is defined as the number of times that
NEWNYM had been called before the stream was opened. All streams
are isolated by nym epoch.
This feature should be redundant with existing signewnym stuff, but
it provides a good belt-and-suspenders way for us to avoid ever
letting any circuit type bypass signewnym.
This patch adds fields to track how streams should be isolated, and
ensures that those fields are set correctly. It also adds fields to
track what streams can go on a circuit, and adds functions to see
whether a streams can go on a circuit and update the circuit
accordingly. Those functions aren't yet called.
Proposal 171 gives us a new syntax for parsing client port options.
You can now have as many FooPort options as you want (for Foo in
Socks, Trans, DNS, NATD), and they can have address:port arguments,
and you can specify the level of isolation on those ports.
Additionally, this patch refactors the client port parsing logic to
use a new type, port_cfg_t. Previously, ports to be bound were
half-parsed in config.c, and later re-parsed in connection.c when
we're about to bind them. Now, parsing a port means converting it
into a port_cfg_t, and binding it uses only a port_cfg_t, without
needing to parse the user-provided strings at all.
We should do a related refactoring on other port types. For
control ports, that'll be easy enough. For ORPort and DirPort,
we'll want to do this when we solve proposal 118 (letting servers
bind to and advertise multiple ports).
This implements tickets 3514 and 3515.
This adds a little code complexity: we need to remember for each
node whether it supports the right feature, and then check for each
connection whether it's exiting at such a node. We store this in a
flag in the edge_connection_t, and set that flag at link time.
Returning a tristate is needless here; we can just use the yielded
transport/proxy_type field to tell whether there's a proxy, and have
the return indicate success/failure.
Also, store the proxy_type in the or_connection_t rather than letting
it get out of sync if a configuration reload happens between launching
the or_connection and deciding what to say with it.
This change also requires us to add and use a pair of
allocator/deallocator functions for socks_request_t, instead of
using tor_malloc_zero/tor_free directly.
In the code as it stood, we would accept any number of socks5
username/password authentication messages, regardless of whether we
had actually negotiated username/password authentication. Instead,
we should only accept one, and only if we have really negotiated
username/password authentication.
This patch also makes some fields of socks_request_t into uint8_t,
for safety.
* Improved function documentation.
* Renamed find_bridge_transport_by_addrport() to
find_transport_by_bridge_addrport().
* Sanitized log severities we use.
* Ran check-spaces.
UseBridges 1 now means "connect only to bridges; if you know no
bridges, don't make connections." UseBridges auto means "Use bridges
if they are known, and we have no EntryNodes set, and we aren't a
server." UseBridges 0 means "don't use bridges."
