Commit Graph

16 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nick Mathewson
57699de005 Update the copyright year. 2016-02-27 18:48:19 +01:00
Nick Mathewson
f54e54b0b4 Bump copyright dates to 2015, in case someday this matters. 2015-01-02 14:27:39 -05:00
Nick Mathewson
4ac5175109 Fix wide lines (from 13172) 2014-11-12 13:42:01 -05:00
Nick Mathewson
a3dafd3f58 Replace operators used as macro arguments with OP_XX macros
Part of fix for 13172
2014-11-12 13:28:07 -05:00
Nick Mathewson
fcdcb377a4 Add another year to our copyright dates.
Because in 95 years, we or our successors will surely care about
enforcing the BSD license terms on this code.  Right?
2014-10-28 15:30:16 -04:00
Sebastian Hahn
909aa51b3f Remove configure option to disable curve25519
By now, support in the network is widespread and it's time to require
more modern crypto on all Tor instances, whether they're clients or
servers. By doing this early in 0.2.6, we can be sure that at some point
all clients will have reasonable support.
2014-10-27 14:41:19 +01:00
Nick Mathewson
0243895792 Use coccinelle scripts to clean up our unit tests
This should get rid of most of the users of the old test_*
functions.  Some are in macros and will need manual cleanup, though.

This patch is for 13119, and was automatically generated with these
scripts.  The perl scripts are there because coccinelle hates
operators as macro arguments.

------------------------------

s/==,/_X_EQ_,/g;
s/!=,/_X_NE_,/g;
s/<,/_X_LT_,/g;
s/>,/_X_GT_,/g;
s/>=,/_X_GEQ_,/g;
s/<=,/_X_LEQ_,/g;

------------------------------
@@
expression a;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-test_fail_msg
+TT_DIE
 (
+(
 a
+)
 )
 ...>
 }

@@
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-test_fail()
+TT_DIE(("Assertion failed."))
 ...>
 }

@@
expression a;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-test_assert
+tt_assert
	(a)
 ...>
 }

@@
expression a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-test_eq
+tt_int_op
 (a,
+_X_EQ_,
  b)
 ...>
 }

@@
expression a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-test_neq
+tt_int_op
 (a,
+_X_NEQ_,
  b)
 ...>
 }

@@
expression a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-test_streq
+tt_str_op
 (a,
+_X_EQ_,
  b)
 ...>
 }

@@
expression a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-test_strneq
+tt_str_op
 (a,
+_X_NEQ_,
  b)
 ...>
 }

@@
expression a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-test_eq_ptr
+tt_ptr_op
 (a,
+_X_EQ_,
  b)
 ...>
 }

@@
expression a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func() {
<...
-test_neq_ptr
+tt_ptr_op
 (a,
+_X_NEQ_,
  b)
 ...>
 }

@@
expression a, b, len;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-test_memeq
+tt_mem_op
 (a,
+_X_EQ_,
  b, len)
 ...>
 }

@@
expression a, b, len;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-test_memneq
+tt_mem_op
 (a,
+_X_NEQ_,
  b, len)
 ...>
 }

------------------------------
@@
char a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a == b
+a, _X_EQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
int a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a == b
+a, _X_EQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
long a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a == b
+a, _X_EQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
unsigned int a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_uint_op
 (
-a == b
+a, _X_EQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
unsigned long a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_uint_op
 (
-a == b
+a, _X_EQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
char a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a != b
+a, _X_NEQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
int a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a != b
+a, _X_NEQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
long a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a != b
+a, _X_NEQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
unsigned int a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_uint_op
 (
-a != b
+a, _X_NEQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
unsigned long a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_uint_op
 (
-a != b
+a, _X_NEQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
char a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a >= b
+a, _X_GEQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
int a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a >= b
+a, _X_GEQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
long a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a >= b
+a, _X_GEQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
unsigned int a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_uint_op
 (
-a >= b
+a, _X_GEQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
unsigned long a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_uint_op
 (
-a >= b
+a, _X_GEQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
char a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a <= b
+a, _X_LEQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
int a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a <= b
+a, _X_LEQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
long a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a <= b
+a, _X_LEQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
unsigned int a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_uint_op
 (
-a <= b
+a, _X_LEQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
unsigned long a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_uint_op
 (
-a <= b
+a, _X_LEQ_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
char a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a > b
+a, _X_GT_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
int a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a > b
+a, _X_GT_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
long a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a > b
+a, _X_GT_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
unsigned int a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_uint_op
 (
-a > b
+a, _X_GT_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
unsigned long a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_uint_op
 (
-a > b
+a, _X_GT_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
char a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a < b
+a, _X_LT_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
int a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a < b
+a, _X_LT_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
long a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_int_op
 (
-a < b
+a, _X_LT_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
unsigned int a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_uint_op
 (
-a < b
+a, _X_LT_, b
 )
 ...>
}

@@
unsigned long a, b;
identifier func;
@@
 func (...) {
<...
-tt_assert
+tt_uint_op
 (
-a < b
+a, _X_LT_, b
 )
 ...>
}

------------------------------

s/_X_NEQ_/!=/g;
s/_X_NE_/!=/g;
s/_X_EQ_/==/g;
s/_X_GT_/>/g;
s/_X_LT_/</g;
s/_X_GEQ_/>=/g;
s/_X_LEQ_/<=/g;

s/test_mem_op\(/tt_mem_op\(/g;
2014-09-15 21:18:21 -04:00
Nick Mathewson
e198faa633 Quick-and-dirty test for packed_cell_is_destroy 2014-05-07 02:05:35 -04:00
Nick Mathewson
4215c801ff Tests for resolved_cell_parse 2014-04-02 15:38:00 -04:00
Nick Mathewson
4da083db3b Update the copyright date to 201. 2013-01-16 01:54:56 -05:00
Nick Mathewson
5c68a1efaa Don't check create cells too much when we're relaying them
We want to sanity-check our own create cells carefully, and other
people's loosely.
2013-01-03 11:29:47 -05:00
Nick Mathewson
1ed4786dba Implement scheme to allow ntor requests/responses via older servers 2013-01-03 11:29:47 -05:00
Nick Mathewson
5d15d597a9 Code to parse and format CREATE{,2,_FAST} cells and their allies
As elsewhere, it makes sense when adding or extending a cell type to
actually make the code to parse it into a separate tested function.

This commit doesn't actually make anything use these new functions;
that's for a later commit.
2013-01-03 11:29:46 -05:00
Nick Mathewson
882b389668 Actually send back correctly-formed IPv6 CONNECTED cells
We had some old code to send back connected cells for IPv6 addresses,
but it was wrong.  Fortunately, it was also unreachable.
2012-11-14 23:16:41 -05:00
Nick Mathewson
cac5335195 Get the client side of receiving an IPv6 address to work
This makes it so we can handle getting an IPv6 in the 3 different
formats we specified it for in RESOLVED cells,
END_STREAM_REASON_EXITPOLICY cells, and CONNECTED cells.

We don't cache IPv6 addresses yet, since proposal 205 isn't
implemented.

There's a refactored function for parsing connected cells; it has unit
tests.
2012-11-14 23:16:23 -05:00
Nick Mathewson
462ebb270a Refactor begin cell parsing into its own function, with tests.
Add 'flags' argument to begin cells, per proposal 208.
2012-11-14 23:16:21 -05:00