I think that the trailing __ got added in false analogy to
HAVE_MACRO__func__, HAVE_MACRO__FUNC__, and HAVE_MACRO__FUNCTION__.
But those macros actually indicate the presence of __func__,
__FUNC__, and __FUNCTION__ respectively. The __ at the end of
HAVE_EXTERN_ENVIRON_DECLARED would only be appropriate if the
environ were declared__, whatever that means.
(As a side-note, HAVE_MACRO__func__ and so on should probably be
renamed HAVE_MACRO___func__ and so on. But that can wait.)
This is an identifier renaming only.
If the client uses a v2 cipherlist on the renegotiation handshake,
it looks as if they could fail to get a good cert chain from the
server, since they server would re-disable certificate chaining.
This patch makes it so the code that make the server side of the
first v2 handshake special can get called only once.
Fix for 4591; bugfix on 0.2.0.20-rc.
They boil down to:
- MS_WINDOWS is dead and replaced with _WIN32, but we let a few
instances creep in when we merged Esteban's tests.
- Capitalizing windows header names confuses mingw.
- #ifdef 0 ain't C.
- One unit test wasn't compiled on windows, but was being listed
anyway.
- One unit test was checking for the wrong value.
Gisle Vanem found and fixed the latter 3 issues.
Fixes bug #4528 "read_to_buf_tls(): Inconsistency in code".
This check was added back in 0.1.0.3-rc, but somehow we forgot to
leave it in when we refactored read_to_buf_tls in 0.1.0.5-rc.
(patch by Arturo; commit message and changes file by nickm)
Instead of checking for 'rejected' and calling everything else okay,
let's check for 'outdated' and call everythign else a problem. This
way we don't risk missing future errors so much.
When logging a message that _looks_ like an error message at info, we
should mention that it isn't really a problem.
The bump from miniupnpc-1.5 to 1.6 changes the definition of
two functions used by tor-fw-helper-upnp.c, upnpDiscover() and
UPNP_AddPortMapping(). This patch addresses this and adds a
check in configure.in for backwards compatibility.
Thanks to Nickolay Kolchin-Semyonov for some hints.
X-Tor-Bug-URL: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/5434
X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376621
Signed-off-by: Anthony G. Basile <blueness@gentoo.org>
Previously, we would reset it at the drop of a hat -- every time a second
passes without any of the intro-point circs already launched for the
service failing.
Fixes bug 4607.
In general, whenever we can, we should be doing
base64_decode(buf, sizeof(buf), s, strlen(s)),
and not
base_64_decode(buf, expr1, s, expr2)
where we hope that expr1 is a good name for the size of buf and expr2
is a good formula for the length of the base64 expression in s.
Fixes coverity CID 508: coverity scan doesn't like checking a
variable for non-NULL after it has been definitely dereferenced.
This should take us back down to zero coverity issues.
* Document fmt_addr_impl() and friends.
* Parenthesize macro arguments.
* Rename get_first_listener_addrport_for_pt() to
get_first_listener_addrport_string().
* Handle port_cfg_t with no_listen.
* Handle failure of router_get_active_listener_port_by_type().
* Add an XXX to router_get_active_listener_port_by_type().
This is just refactoring work here. The old logic was kind of
convoluted, especially after the bug 5572 fix. We don't actually need to
distinguish so many cases here. Dropping detection of the
"!old_options || !old_options->DynamicDHGroups" case is fine because
that's the same that we'd do for clients.
Also add a changes file for bug 5572.
The message only means that we're publishing a new descriptor when we
are actually in some kind of server mode, and publication is on.
Fix for bug 3942; bugfix on 0.2.3.2-alpha.
This fixes a side-channel attack on the (fortunately unused!)
BridgePassword option for bridge authorities. Fix for bug 5543;
bugfix on 0.2.0.14-alpha.
Introduce get_first_listener_addrport_for_pt() which returns a string
containing the addrport of the first listener we could find. Use it to
form the TOR_PT_ORPORT managed proxy protocol line.
This is ticket 2479. Roger's original explanation was:
We have a series of bugs where relays publish a descriptor within
12 hours of their last descriptor, but the authorities drop it
because it's not different "enough" from the last one and it's
too close to the last one.
The original goal of this idea was to a) reduce the number of new
descriptors authorities accept (and thus have to store) and b)
reduce the total number of descriptors that clients and mirrors
fetch. It's a defense against bugs where relays publish a new
descriptor every minute.
Now that we're putting out one consensus per hour, we're doing
better at the total damage that can be caused by 'b'.
There are broader-scale design changes that would help here, and
we've had a trac entry open for years about how relays should
recognize that they're not in the consensus, or recognize when
their publish failed, and republish sooner.
In the mean time, I think we should change some of the parameters
to make the problem less painful.
==
Nick here. I tweaked this patch a little to make it apply cleanly to
master, to extract some common code into a function, and to replace
snprintf with tor_snprintf.
-- nickm
One of our unit tests checks that they behave correctly (giving an
error) when the base is negative. But there isn't a guarantee that
strtol and friends actually handle negative bases correctly.
Found by Coverity Scan; fix for CID 504.
Coverity doesn't like the fact that we were storing the value of
parse_config_line_from_str() but not checking it in a couple of
cases.
Fixes CID 505 and 506.
Calling crypto_cipher_free(NULL) is always safe, since (by
convention) all of our xyz_free() functions treat xyz_free(NULL) as
a no-op.
Flagged by coverity scan; fixes CID 508 and 509.
A previous commit in the 5527 branch had moved
router_get_mutable_by_digest(digest_rcvd) to happen before we did
tor_assert(digest_rcvd), which would have defeated the purpose of
the assert.
Specifically, I believe it dates back to when extend cells had address:port
but no digest in them. The special edge case is certainly not worth the
complexity these days.
